原文网址: http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/26/26-8-2013/#more-2230 = First, some info from Overlord: 首先是来自 Overlord 的一些消息: - the bug where the vehicle says “not ready for battle” but in fact it IS read for battle on test server is a bug, it will be solved 测试服上已经就绪的车辆显示出 "车辆尚未就绪" 的错误讯息是个 bug，之後会修掉 - the Tiger buffs will make the Tiger more popular Tiger buff 之後会让它更热门 - there will be no special XP/credit compensation for engines lost in 8.8 8.8 移除引擎不会给予 XP/银币作为补偿 - if you sell your Superpershing, you will get no gold compensation for its gold ammo 卖超潘的时候上头的金币迷彩不会一并退还金币 Regular Q&A 一般 Q&A - WG will compensate premium account only if the servers were down for more than 4 hours WG 只有在伺服器离线超过四小时才会补偿加值帐号 - the new WG rating does not imply there will be a rating based MM 做了新的 WG 排名并不表示会有技术分房 - there will be no “forsage” mode/consumable for Germans, as the 1200hp engines (E-50/75) were totally unhistorical, the “forsage” allowed the engine to temporarily operate at 1000hp and it was available only in the 60′s 德国不会有任何 "移除限速器" 模式/消耗品，E-50/75 的 1200hp 引擎完全不符合史 实；只有六零年代的时候有这个功能暂时让引擎达到 1000hp - boiler plates of the same thickness are roughly two times less effective than armor plates, when it comes to resistance to shells. That’s one of the reasons more “layers”of Superpershing armor will not be modelled, it will stay as it is in 8.8 同样厚度的锅炉壁抵抗炮弹的能力大概是装甲板的一半，这就是为什麽 8.8 中超潘的 装甲不会再多加几层的原因。 - the reason Leopard prototype has such a thin armor (50mm) is that by that time, all the countries used HEAT and subcaliber rounds en masse and the designers thought that no matter what they do, the armor will get penetrated anyway, so they might as well make it withstand only low caliber weapons fire from autocannons, while making the vehicle lighter and faster Leopard PTA 的装甲那麽薄(50mm)的原因是因为当时所有的国家都大量的在打 HEAT 和 次口径弹，所以开发者想说既然不管怎麽做装甲都会被打穿，乾脆只做能抵抗小口径弹 药的装甲，让车辆可以又轻又快 - the German tanks didn’t have historical modules in the past, because “it was not possible to do it from the start” (SS: I guess it’s tied to the evolution of the branches, where vehicles were forced to fill other niches, f.e. +/-3 tier spread) 德国车以前没有史实的模组，因为 "不可能一开始就这麽做" (SS: 我猜是因为跟游戏发展的历史有关，像是当时需要把车辆塞进 +/-3 阶级分房) - SerB has a Moskvich 2141 from 1993 as his car SerB 从 1993 年就开 Moskvich 2141 这辆车 - Soviet 1200hp engines are historical, as it was basically two 600hp V-2 engines working in pair 苏联 1200hp 引擎是史实的，基本上就是两个 600hp V-2 一起运作 - Q:”Will you make the commander’s copulas not damageable by shells?” A:”And what about a ‘make me invulnerable and kill all’ button?” Q: "你们会做打不穿的车长塔吗?" A: "做一个让你无敌而且炸了所有其他人的按钮如何?" - reward tanks from missions will be hard to obtain 作为任务奖品的车辆会很难拿 - SerB on how much historical WOT is: “We balance the historicity and the playability in such an extent we consider necessery” SerB 对於 WoT 有多符合史实的评论: "我们在史实与游戏性中间觉得需要调整的地方做平衡" - despite the fact tanks are being balanced around their top configuration, SerB states that no gun is considered to be “top” and thus the two guns for T-44 for example (D-25T and LB-1) are considered equal 即便车辆是以顶车的情况下去做平衡，SerB 指出并没有单一的 "顶炮" ，像是 T-44 的两门炮 (D-25T 与 LB-1) 被视作是相同的 - RU251 will not come in 8.9, as there are still some issues with obtaining some info from Münster RU251 不会在 8.9 引入，因为从 Münster 那边拿到资料还有些困难 - the idea is that free experience should be shared between WoT, WoWp and WoWs, but the developers are still waiting for some technical solution on this 开发组的想法是要让自由经验能在 WoT 、 WoWp 、 WoWs 之间共用，不过目前还在等 待可以达成这个目标的解决方法 - Q: “You removed the unhistorical engine from E-75. How do you know what engine was historical, when the vehicle was never built and no engine was installed in it?” A: “No engine was installed in it in real life, so we’ll just remove all the engines from it” Q: "你们把 E-75 的非史实引擎移掉了，这辆车根本没打造出来你们怎麽知道哪个引擎 是基於史实的?" A: "现实中根本没有任何一个引擎有装上去过，所以我们就把所有的引擎都移除了" - Object 139 won’t be introduced as a separate tank Obj. 139 不会做成独立的一辆车 - the entire German E-series rebalance is a compromise according to SerB SerB 说重新平衡德国整条 E-系列线是个妥协 - Havoc server-side destruction physics will be implemented 物件毁坏的 Havoc 伺服器端物理计算会做 - S-34 (the new coming KV-1S gun) is roughly equal to the 100mm D-10T, it’s a bit weaker in secondary parameters S-34 (新的 KV-1S 炮) 和 100mm D-10T 大略相同，不过在次要数据上比较弱一点 - SerB is still fighting to keep the 122mm KV-1S SerB 正在为保留 KV-1S 的 122 炮努力中 - 2nd German TD branch in 8.9? “It’s possible” 8.9 做第二条德国 TD 线? "有可能" - 7/42 companies: “when it’s done it’s done” 7/42 装甲连: "WIDID" - the fire extinguisher change is not actual ATM (SS: there was a plan to make all the fire extinguishers automatic, with the skill reducing the delay in which they activate) 现在还不确定灭火器的更动要怎麽改 (SS: 有个想法是让灭火器自动灭火，灭火技能则影响起火到灭火器运作中间的延迟时间) - Q: “Why does not shooting allies who are capturing enemy base reset the capture counter like when you shoot enemies?” A: “So that retards – and you did try that, didn’t you? – don’t disrupt the capture while screaming ‘No cap!!!!!!’” Q: "为什麽打占领中的队友不会像打占领中的敌人一样重置占领条呢?" A: "因为会这样做的是智障，而且你还真的做了? 队友在占领的时候不会喊 "别占 领!!!!!!" 阿?" = 完 --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 36.231.18.63