作者wl00669773 (Jerry shou)
看板Warfare
标题Re: [心得]《国防军三部曲》读後感。
时间Fri Feb 12 14:55:06 2021
※ 引述《fw190a (las)》之铭言:
: ※ 引述《wl00669773 (Jerry shou)》之铭言:
: 感谢回应,还是说点我的看法,
: 我的思路还是反过来的,瓜岛战役的重心始终都还是在制空权的争夺上,
: 用舰队决战的概念来分析从一开始就会走入误区,
: 尤其是把地形这个次要因素当作主要框架就会更怪。
: 投入战舰不划算的主要原因是夜战,而不是海域狭窄,
: 而导致夜战限定的是制空权的有无。
应该说制空权导致夜战限定,而地形则是导致只能使用狭窄海域的战法
结果就是必须遭受夜战+狭窄海域双重限制
1943年日本海军教则战列舰教则狭窄海域部分(其实他同时也指出夜战的情境类似於狭窄海域)
https://imgur.com/R7rAIme
英军的Minor Action夜战章节就写巡洋和驱逐是该类型(近岸)作战的优先选择
https://bit.ly/2NoUbyI
即便是日间也是
: 以假想来说,这边有两条支线,
: 一个是日军不惜成本,把更多战舰投入夜战,
: 但除了更耗油,给美军陆战队压力更大,真的足以逆转吗?
: 运气好的话能靠战力差距打出更漂亮的交换比,
: 运气不好也可能损失战舰,甚至美军看对方数量太多就不打了,
: 毕竟後来的夜战大多数是日军有运补或掩护任务,然後美军主动开战。
一来是狭窄海域(含夜战)会有的问题
1.太多战舰挤在一起阵型排布困难,战舰一多,辅助舰艇就要更多,结果就是海域塞满一堆船,无法进行机动闪避。
2.友军辨识困难
二来是日军不想...
根据"1943年"的"改良後的"日本海军教则指出,夜战原则上会投入的主力舰为金刚级高速战列舰,就算是在开放海域的夜战
https://imgur.com/URf3lNW
不过这点也不太能拿来批评日本,夜战投入战舰的风险本来就很大
Major Action连同主力战舰队入夜战的战法可以参考英国的
https://bit.ly/2LH5wcG
: 另一个更大胆的做法,则是直接一波大的,集结主力舰队直接持续压制,
: 承担战舰白天被空母攻击的风险,
: 美军的空母和陆基(如果没在夜间被成功压制)当然是会很开心的发动打击,
: 问题是真的能有效杀伤到这样一支主力舰队失去战斗力吗?
: 然後在具备空优打击支援下,美军敢不敢派出主力舰队跟日军舰队决战,
: 就变成美军要进行的判断。
: 这些可能性里面,日军取得决定性胜利的机率很低,需要很多重条件的配合,
: 也就是空袭效果不佳,美军又判断可以打,最後决战又要打得漂亮。
: 如果付出主力舰队损伤,却只换到消灭岛上美军,日军在战略面上还是输。
如果要集结大部队,白天硬打,除了美军可能转进,美军接战的话还可能面临美军先行部署潜艇的危机,而在瓜岛遇上雷击,是真的很危险的
尤其是可能要同时面对飞机鱼雷、驱逐鱼雷、潜艇鱼雷,就算是美军烂铁棍也不能轻忽。
fw大的判断确实很合乎现实逻辑
先不论日本到底是否因为制空权(我原本的推论是日本人先判断该海域不能集结大部队,後来才被美国人夺走制空权,接着只能打夜战,但是没证据。)在美国手上而"只能"在夜间行动
他们选择了夜间行动,就代表几乎很难在该区域投入战列舰。
英国人在类似的近岸作战环境会以轻巡驱逐为主
日本无论在哪,只要入夜就是金刚级带巡洋和驱逐作战
美国人...美国人根本不喜欢带战列舰入夜战,不仅限於小规模作战,战前根本没设想过战列舰
进夜战
就算是1944年,传统派的如斯普鲁恩斯和Lee也是一样不让BB入夜战
根据Lee的说法:
Mitscher asked Lee if he desired a night action.126 Lee declined emphatically:
“Do not[,] repeat[,] do not believe we should seek night engagement.”
“Our battleships are neither designed nor armed for close range night
actions with enemy light forces. A few minutes intense fire . . . from
secondary battery guns can, and did, render one of our new battleships deaf,
dumb, blind and impotent through destruction of radar, radio and fire control
circuits.”
就算有瓜岛的经验、雷达科技点上去了也是怕得要死XDD
--
Destroy the enemy and you will secure all these results at once: the
protection of the coast will be assured and you will conclude successfully whatever
operation the circumstances demand. ,
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc), 来自: 220.142.43.193 (台湾)
※ 文章网址: https://webptt.com/cn.aspx?n=bbs/Warfare/M.1613112914.A.785.html
※ 编辑: wl00669773 (220.142.43.193 台湾), 02/12/2021 16:11:42
1F:推 hsinhanchu: 推讨论 02/12 16:28
2F:推 fw190a: 基本同意,除了狭窄海域的定义和限制还是比较模糊 02/12 23:34
这方面要看海军战略战术的书籍,会解释得比教则再清楚一点
Naval Strategy and Operations in Narrow Seas
摘录部分内容
"most naval actions in the future will most likely take place in relative
proximity to the shores of the world’s continental landmass, in areas
known as ‘littoral waters’, and part of a war in the littorals would take
place in the waters of enclosed and semi-enclosed seas, the popularly
called ‘narrow seas’"
跟英国教则应该算互相呼应
"The range of threats to the survivability of large surface combatants and
submarines is greater in a typical narrow sea than on the open ocean because
the weaker opponent can use land-based aircraft, small and fast surface
combatants or conventional submarines, mines and even coastal anti-ship
cruise missiles to contest control of a stronger navy. The small size of the
theater and the proximity of the landing area in a typical narrow sea demand
a much greater degree of cooperation among the services than in any war
conducted predominantly on the open ocean."
此书也有举实战~含瓜岛进行说明,应该可以说是讨论这个议题最棒的一本书
此外还可以看
On Naval Warfare
"The existence (or absence) of offshore islands greatly affects the conduct of war
in narrow seas."
"In a typical narrow sea, short distances between various points, the presence
of a large number of islands/islets, shallow water, the changing character of
the seabed, and the influence of various oceanographic features n the
employment of surface ships/
submarines and their weapons/sensors.
In general, the coast endowed with numerous islands facilitates greatly
covert and quick deployment/redeployment and concentration/dispersal of one’
s naval forces. Numerous sea passages in the archipelago type of coast offer
a great choice of routes for selecting ambushing positions to attack the enemy
’s large surface combatants or merchant shipping. "
岛屿、海峡等沿岸地形基本上都算是Narrow Sea
更多实战面的文献除了太平洋地区外可以看
The Battle of the Narrow Seas The History of the Light Coastal Forces in the
Channel North Sea,
※ 编辑: wl00669773 (220.142.43.193 台湾), 02/13/2021 07:45:15
3F:推 Harrychou: 战舰不打近距离夜战是因为主炮射速的关系? 02/13 13:39
4F:→ wl00669773: 是因为远距离驱逐只能单方面挨打,战舰是安全的,但 02/13 13:58
5F:→ wl00669773: 是被贴近身可就没那麽安全了 02/13 13:58
6F:推 qlz: 近战就能发射鱼雷了...... 02/13 14:24
7F:推 fetoyeh: 可以参考一下苏里高夜战 西村舰队怎麽死的 02/13 15:12