作者stasis (流雨风雪)
看板Trading
标题Avoiding Overconfidence
时间Wed Mar 7 23:48:17 2007
Avoiding Overconfidence
by Van K. Tharp, Ph.D.
If I could give just one piece of advice to a trader, it would be: Avoid
overconfidence—it could be your worst enemy. Thousands of traders make
the mistake of becoming overconfident each month and lose substantial
amounts of money. For example, the following incidents were brought to my
attention just recently:
A trader — whom we will call Henry — needed to make $7,000 each month to
meet his living expenses. This particular month was exceptional; he made
$20,000 in two weeks making low-risk trades and following his own trading
rules. He was feeling on top of the world; he could do no wrong.
One Friday morning, however, he noticed a marginal trade that involved more
risk than he normally took. Henry decided to take it. The market immediately
went against him and he was stopped out for a $1,500 loss. His money
management rules called for a maximum risk of $1,000 on a trade, so his
early morning results were totally unacceptable. As a result, he quickly
opened up another high-risk marginal position. By the end of the day, he'd
lost a total of $4,500. The following Monday he was still upset about
losing $4,500. He took several more high-risk trades, only to lose another
$3,500. A trader in the Midwest told me that he had made $80,000 in profits
on a $40,000 account in two months of conservative trading. Then, he said,
he stopped paying attention to risk — and blew out his total profit in two
weeks. I visited a client in New York and spent some time talking to the
firm's president about his trading.
Indirectly, the company president mentioned how he was trading — he had most
of his money tied up in large spread positions. I looked at what he was
doing and told him that it could cost him his company. In response, he
told me that he was totally protected — that it was a spread position with
zero risk. Two months later, the firm lost $1.5 million from that position.
The traders in each case were overconfident. The mental state of confidence
has little to do with the accuracy of one's prediction about the market and
even less to do with one's ability to make money in the market. Studies on
confidence have shown that humans by nature are very inaccurate. But when
people invest effort (or money) into a position, it is very difficult to
admit being wrong. People tend to deceive themselves; self-deception occurs
each time a person clings to a false belief. False beliefs that are rigidly
held onto greatly increase the chance of failure, because people simply do
not know what they are confronting.
When people truly believe something, they manage to find evidence to support
their belief. If someone expects the market to go up, then every correction
upward in a bear market will support that theory. And if the market does turn
around, even if the timing was off by six months, then such a person often
will believe that he was correct all along.
PERCEPTION VS. REALITY
Psychologists Sarah Lichtenstein and Baruch Fischoff conducted studies that
found that people who were taught to read stock charts and then asked to
interpret another series of charts were correct only 47.2% of the time in
predicting whether prices would be higher or lower one month later. Their
confidence levels, however, averaged 65.4% (with 50% being chance confidence
and 100% being certainty). The experimental subjects were no more correct
when their confidence levels were high than when their confidence levels
were low. When people invest effort (or money) into a position, it is very
difficult to admit being wrong.
What about extreme confidence—those times when we are really sure?
Lichtenstein, Fischoff and their colleagues had subjects rate their
confidence in various statements in termsof odds rather than a percentage.
For example, 75% confidence would be equivalent to three to one odds, or
being correct three out of four times. When the subjects gave odds of 100
to one in the confidence of their answers, they were correct only three
out of four times in one study and four out of five times in another study.
When subjects rated their confidence at a million to one, they were correct
nine out of 10 times in one study and 16 out of 17 times in another study,
even though the researchers carefully explained the meaning of the odds to
those participating in the experiment. Moreover, most had enough faith in
their confidence judgments to say they were willing to stake money on the
validity of the statements.
Most of us have a tendency to overestimate how right we are. This tendency
does not depend upon intelligence. Einstein once wasted years of effort
because he would not believe a colleague who apprised him of an error in
his calculations. Nor does overconfidence in our positions depend upon our
expertise in a given subject. Experts may be more knowledgeable about their
subject matter than others are, but they are still not very accurate in
estimating how much they know. Expertise in technical analysis, for
example, has little to do with making money in the markets.
AVOIDING THE OVERCONFIDENCE BIAS
The only factor that does seem to influence overconfidence is the amount of
information that is available; the more information to which one is exposed,
the more one tends to be overconfident about his or her beliefs and
positions. Thus, if you are exposed to a great deal of information in
order to make a decision about the market, you will be more adamant about
your position once you make up your mind.
Unfortunately, most information — especially financial information — has
little correlation with price movements. Thus, exposure to a lot of data
will probably make a trader much more confident in a position but have
little bearing on whether he is correct about the direction of market
movement. Overconfidence can be avoided if you keep in mind a simple set
of guidelines:
Being right has little to do with making profits. A good hitter in baseball
will make outs 70% of the time and hit home runs about 3% of the time and
will have what is considered to be an excellent average. If he improved his
results to consistently making outs only 60% of the time and hitting home
runs 5% of the time, he would probably be one of the best hitters ever. The
same generally holds for most good traders. They make winning trades less
than 50% of the time and they hit home runs occasionally. If their losses
are small, then profits can be tremendous. Successful trading requires that
you know when you are wrong. Before you enter the market, always know what
signs the market will give you to prove you are wrong. If you don't know
when you are wrong before you get in a trade, then you do not have a
workable trading method.
Make sure you have a set of rules that you use to guide your behavior.
These rules should include information about how you will know when you
are wrong and the necessary steps you must take to get out. In addition,
the set of rules should also fully detail the conditions under which you
will open a position and take profits. Trade only when you meet all the
conditions that you set forth in your rules.
A mistake means not following your rules. You can make money and still make
a mistake by violating your rules. This combination is particularly dangerous
because it encourages the trader to repeat those mistakes. In contrast, you
may do everything perfectly, according to your rules, get out when the market
tells you you are wrong, and lose money. This is a normal part of trading
and occurs frequently. Pat yourself on the back for following your rules.
If you cannot follow these four guidelines, then the problem may be much
deeper than just overconfidence. You may have a problem with internal
conflict or self-esteem. If you think you have such problems, no trading
methodology will help you. Instead, get some professional help. Such
problems will invariably affect your wealth, your relationships and your
happiness.
I welcome input from STOCKS & COMMODITIES readers. What issues would you like
me to address? Send in your questions to me care of STOCKS & COMMODITIES,
3517 SW Alaska Street, Seattle, WA 98126, and I'll discuss them here. Let
us hear from you.
Van K. Tharp is a research psychologist who specializes in the psychology of
top trading. Investment Psychology Consulting, 337 Lochside Drive,
Cary, NC 27511, (919) 233-8855.
--
波段单王道:多头做多、空头做空、盘整少做、赚钱加码、赔钱停损
小弟在永丰金证券,来开户就不定期提供个人观察潜力股名单
以及操作建议,股票期权手续费都有优惠唷,意者请mail ^^
http://blog.pixnet.net/stasis
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 59.117.73.142
※ 编辑: stasis 来自: 59.117.73.142 (03/07 23:54)