第一次在雷霆版PO外电翻译，请多指教。 翻错请告诉我噢！ －－－－－ 原文出处：http://ppt.cc/OfHI Don't blame Westbrook for Game 2 loss After the Oklahoma City Thunder’s loss to the Miami Heat in Game 2, many people are placing the blame on Russell Westbrook. 在输掉对战热火的第二战之後，很多人都把错怪在西河身上。 Westbrook took the most shots of anyone in the game, going 10-of-26 from the field and scoring 27 points. In some cases, the main thought seems to be that Kevin Durant, who went 12-for-22 from the field and finished with 32 points, should have gotten some of the opportunities that Westbrook “took away.” 西河在这场比赛里投了最多的球，却只有26-10的命中，贡献27分。在某些角度来看，22 投12中的雷帝应该要拿到更多一些被西河夺走的进攻机会。 In fact, the refrain that “he takes away too many shots from Durant” has been a commonly heard criticism of Westbrook all season. The problem with this attack is that the numbers show that the Thunder haven’t actually done better in games where Durant has had more opportunities than Westbrook this season. 事实上，「西河夺走太多雷帝的进攻权了」这样的批评已经跟着西河一整季。问题是，当 雷帝拿到更多进攻权时，雷霆并没有表现得比较好。 When looking at it the simple way, it’s apparent that the team actually does better when Westbrook takes more shots. This is in terms of both offensive efficiency and win percentage. 用这角度来看，当西河投了较多的球时，他们的团队明显地表现的比较好。这同时显示在 进攻率和胜率上。 Of course, field-goal attempts are just one part of a player’s offensive game –free throws and turnovers are also part of it. If we look at usage percentage – the percentage of team plays used by a player while he’s on the floor – we can see how often the ball ends with Westbrook or Durant, whether it be with a field-goal attempt, trip to the free-throw line, or turnover. 当然，投篮命中率只是球员进攻中的一部份。罚球和失误也是其中的一部份。如果我们看 看使用率－－一个球队如何使用在场上的球员的使用率－－我们可以发现球有多频繁地在 西河或雷帝手上被打掉，不管是用投篮、罚球或是失误。 For some perspective, the average usage percentage is 20.0 percent, Durant’s average this season is 30.3 percent, and Westbrook’s average is 31.7 percent (5th-highest in NBA). 整个球队的平均使用率是20%，雷帝的平均使用率是30.3％，西河的平均使用率是31.7%。 （NBA中排名第五） Looking at which player has had a higher usage percentage in each game, we can see a similar pattern emerges: The Thunder are more efficient offensively and win more games when Westbrook’s usage percentage exceeds Durant’s than vice versa. 看看在每一场比赛中每一个有较高使用率的球员，我们可以发现一个相似的模式：雷霆在 西河的使用率高於雷帝时，他们的进攻效率是比较高的。反之亦然。 Another thing we can look at is how the Thunder have performed when Westbrook and Durant use a lower/greater percentage of their team’s plays than usual. 我们也可以看看当两人的使用比率高或低时团队的表现如何。 Looking at the four combinations of each player's usage percentage relative to his own average: 看看四种球员使用率的组合： ‧ The Thunder offense is at its worst when Durant has an above average usage percentage and Westbrook has a below average usage percentage – averaging just 104.0 points per 100 possessions in those 20 games, with the team winning less than half of those as a result. ‧ 当雷帝的使用率高於平均值而西河低於平均值时，雷霆整队的进攻是最差的。他们在 20场比赛中每场比赛只能拿104分，并且赢下不到半数的比赛。 Meanwhile, the Thunder offense is still okay (slightly below average efficiency) when Westbrook uses more plays than usual and Durant uses fewer than usual. So shifting offensive opportunities directly from Westbrook to Durant, at least how that has been done in some games this season, does not seem to be optimal for OKC. 而在此同时，当西河被使用得稍微多於平均、而雷帝稍微低於平均时，雷霆的进攻依然还 算可以（稍微低於平均效率）。因此直接把进攻机会从西河手中交给雷帝，至少在这一季 的某些比赛中，似乎并不是最佳选择。 ‧ The Thunder offense is at its best when Durant and Westbrook are both below average in terms of usage percentage, averaging an efficient 111.8 points per 100 possessions in those games. This would imply that getting others involved is the real key in the Thunder’s most effective offensive games. ‧ 当雷帝与西河的使用率都低於平均值时全队的进攻反而是最佳的，每场比赛可拿下 111.8分。这显示出雷霆的关键是其他人应该要跳出来。 Is this just about Westbrook setting others up better in those low-usage games? It doesn't look like it. In those 22 low-usage games, it is Durant's assists that go up (4.9 APG vs 3.1 in all other games), not Westbrook's (5.2 APG vs 5.7 in all other games). 这表示当西河的进攻减少时他可以帮助队友们起来吗？看起来似乎不是这样。在那22场低 使用率的球赛里，雷帝的助攻数提升了（一场4.9，高於其他场平均的3.1），而并不是西 河（一场5.2，低於其他场平均的5.7）。 －－－－－ 心得：至少我觉得这篇没有一直强调西河该把球给雷帝，他提出来的说法满值得思考的@@ --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 123.193.19.94 ※ 编辑: esther81828 来自: 123.193.19.94 (06/17 10:12)