作者fleuve (:D)
看板TOEIC
标题Re: [其他] 徐微广告中的英文错误
时间Wed May 19 21:52:12 2010
Kaplan University
Whether you want to change or advance your career, Kaplan University’s (KU)
campus or online programs will help you make the most of your talent and
unlock your potential.
We’re using technology to rewrite the rules of
education and create innovative programs that analyze how you learn best, so
we can teach you better. KU online offers master's, bachelor's, associate's,
and professional law degrees, as well as online certificate programs. KU
campuses offer online and/or onsite bachelor's degrees, associate's degrees,
diplomas and certificates. With flexibility, personal attention, and a
quicker path to your degree, KU is a smart choice for working adults,
career-changers and first-time college students alike.
From:
http://www.kaplan.com/Our-Programs/Higher-Education/Career-Training/
default.aspx (shortened:
http://tinyurl.com/2c6tdmk )
I think the context is EXACTLY THE SAME as yours.
Why don't you have a
BETTER look at the sentence and
see why natives write like this?
^^
fleuve
※ 引述《tucson (tucson)》之铭言:
: 最近电视上看到徐微英文的广告 其中她说了句 " I can teach you better."
: 这句英文有点问题. 因为teach 後接双受词 所以better之後必须有名词才对,
: 如果better当副词 也因该说成I can better teach you .( 我可以更用心更好地教导你.)
: 因为如果beter位置不改则离teach 太远,不容意让人意思它要当adv.反而让人觉得
???
真的很远!! 隔了一整个you!!!
: better是当adj.後面却没名词, better的位置放错意义就可能稿错了.
: 刚刚打电话去反应,小姐只能苦笑,说会反应给徐微,不知道她会不会真的反应.
那是因为你不知道为什麽在这个情境下better 後面的东西可以省掉阿阿阿阿
英文老师 你再仔细推敲,好吗^.<?
--
生命的意义不在追求答案,答案
只是另一个答案的问题,
生命在於去
体会与
经历,不管生活在哪里。
╭╮───╪───╭╮
* fleu
ve *
╰╯───╪───╰╯
--
1F:推 fbikgb :EXACTLY 05/19 22:16
※ 编辑: fleuve 来自: 111.248.6.196 (05/19 22:39)
2F:→ wrightshit :那篇根本就是在打广告 认真就输了啦 05/20 01:29
3F:推 madgina :T大说不定 只是意识自我良好的 英文老师 05/20 04:14
4F:推 leon125 :呵呵 自我感觉良好 是指国家竞争力第八吗? ㄆㄆㄆ 05/20 13:38
5F:推 m0535 :就吸引话题性的效果来说,这广告成功了 05/22 01:58
6F:嘘 littlefey :T大无聊吧~懂就好吧~~你会去纠正别人中文吗? 05/22 21:59
7F:→ littlefey :你要不要先去学学中文文法再来看大家有谁讲错话? 05/22 22:01
8F:→ littlefey :我有外国朋友学中文他问我文法,看到都傻眼听起来也怪 05/22 22:03
9F:→ tucson :在上面的用法有上下文 且它不是单独使用与广告表达不 05/24 11:51
10F:→ tucson :一样,本句有前後文使句子看起很清楚 当然不会被误解 05/24 11:52
11F:→ tucson :所以在这种情况下当然是可以被接受的 你举的例子跟我 05/24 11:53
12F:→ tucson :说的状况不太一样, 且你的例子中它不是单独一个句子. 05/24 11:54