这家就没诚信的垃圾公司啊 恶名昭着 怎麽会有人信啦 公司创办人Amodei兄妹 是OpenAI原核心成员 因为担心Open酱过度商业化 违背初衷 跳出去自己开 标榜的就是超乎水准的道德层次(？ 结果呢 在竞争中为获取训练资料 到"盗版网站"大挖特挖 干，你没看错 他们直接到盗版网站去挖 需要付费的非公开资料 人家其他企业挖网路公开资料 还可以说游走道德边缘 这都已经很臭了 何况他们这麽直接抢非公开资讯 毫无下限可言啊 最终赔了15亿美金 遇到竞争、利益就被背弃承诺 呵呵 真的世界灵活的道德底线啦 讲话跟放屁一样 信谁都好 跑去信这种前科重大的 脑子不要了 ※ 引述《breathair (拆了？简单了)》之铭言： : -------------------------------发文提醒---------------------------------- : 1.发文前请先详阅[新闻]分类发文规范，未依规范发文将受处分。 : 2.发文请依照格式文章标明段落，不符合格式者依 1-2-1 处分。 : 3.连结过长请善用缩网址服务，连结不能点击者板规 1-2-2 处分。 : 4.心得/评论请尽量充实，心得过短或滥竽充数将以板规 1-2-3 处分。 : ------------------------ 按ctrl+y 可删除以上内容。 ---------------------- : 原文标题： : Statement from Dario Amodei on our discussions with the Department of War : 原文连结： : https://www.anthropic.com/news/statement-department-of-war : 发布时间： : 2026年2月26日 : 记者署名： : ※原文无记载者得留空 : 原文内容： : I believe deeply in the existential importance of using AI to defend the Unite : d States and other democracies, and to defeat our autocratic adversaries. : Anthropic has therefore worked proactively to deploy our models to the Departm : ent of War and the intelligence community. We were the first frontier AI compa : ny to deploy our models in the US government’s classified networks, the first : to deploy them at the National Laboratories, and the first to provide custom : models for national security customers. Claude is extensively deployed across : the Department of War and other national security agencies for mission-critica : l applications, such as intelligence : analysis, modeling and simulation, operational planning, cyber operations, and : more. : Anthropic has also acted to defend America’s lead in AI, even when it is agai : nst the company’s short-term interest. We chose to forgo several hundred mill : ion dollars in revenue to cut off the use of Claude by firms linked to the Chi : nese Communist Party (some of whom have been designated by the Department of W : ar as Chinese Military Companies), shut down CCP-sponsored cyberattacks that a : ttempted to abuse Claude, and have advocated for strong export controls on chi : ps to ensure a democratic advantage. : Anthropic understands that the Department of War, not private companies, makes : military decisions. We have never raised objections to particular military op : erations nor attempted to limit use of our technology in an ad hoc manner. : However, in a narrow set of cases, we believe AI can undermine, rather than de : fend, democratic values. Some uses are also simply outside the bounds of what : today’s technology can safely and reliably do. Two such use cases have never : been included in our contracts with the Department of War, and we believe they : should not be included now: : Mass domestic surveillance. We support the use of AI for lawful foreign intell : igence and counterintelligence missions. But using these systems for mass dome : stic surveillance is incompatible with democratic values. AI-driven mass surve : illance presents serious, novel risks to our fundamental liberties. To the ext : ent that such surveillance is currently legal, this is only because the law ha : igence and counterintelligence missions. But using these systems for mass dome : stic surveillance is incompatible with democratic values. AI-driven mass surve : illance presents serious, novel risks to our fundamental liberties. To the ext : ent that such surveillance is currently legal, this is only because the law ha : s not yet caught up with the rapidly growing capabilities of AI. For example, : under current law, the government can : purchase detailed records of Americans’ movements, web browsing, and associat : ions from public sources without obtaining a warrant, a practice the Intellige : nce Community has acknowledged raises privacy concerns and that has generated : bipartisan opposition in Congress. Powerful AI makes it possible to assemble t : his scattered, individually innocuous data into a comprehensive picture of any : person’s life—automatically and at massive scale. : Fully autonomous weapons. Partially autonomous weapons, like those used today : in Ukraine, are vital to the defense of democracy. Even fully autonomous weapo : ns (those that take humans out of the loop entirely and automate selecting and : engaging targets) may prove critical for our national defense. But today, fro : ntier AI systems are simply not reliable enough to power fully autonomous weap : ons. We will not knowingly provide a product that puts America’s warfighters : and civilians at risk. We have offered : to work directly with the Department of War on R&D to improve the reliability : of these systems, but they have not accepted this offer. In addition, without : proper oversight, fully autonomous weapons cannot be relied upon to exercise t : of these systems, but they have not accepted this offer. In addition, without : proper oversight, fully autonomous weapons cannot be relied upon to exercise t : he critical judgment that our highly trained, professional troops exhibit ever : y day. They need to be deployed with proper guardrails, which don’t exist tod : ay. : To our knowledge, these two exceptions have not been a barrier to accelerating : the adoption and use of our models within our armed forces to date. : The Department of War has stated they will only contract with AI companies who : accede to “any lawful use” and remove safeguards in the cases mentioned abo : ve. They have threatened to remove us from their systems if we maintain these : safeguards; they have also threatened to designate us a “supply chain risk” : —a label reserved for US adversaries, never before applied to an American com : pany—and to invoke the Defense Production Act to force the safeguards’ remov : al. These latter two threats are : inherently contradictory: one labels us a security risk; the other labels Clau : de as essential to national security. : Regardless, these threats do not change our position: we cannot in good consci : ence accede to their request. : It is the Department’s prerogative to select contractors most aligned with th : eir vision. But given the substantial value that Anthropic’s technology provi : des to our armed forces, we hope they reconsider. Our strong preference is to : continue to serve the Department and our warfighters—with our two requested s : afeguards in place. Should the Department choose to offboard Anthropic, we wil : l work to enable a smooth transition to another provider, avoiding any disrupt : ion to ongoing military planning, : operations, or other critical missions. Our models will be available on the ex : pansive terms we have proposed for as long as required. : We remain ready to continue our work to support the national security of the U : nited States. : 达里奥·阿莫代（Dario Amodei）关於我们与战争部（Department of War）讨论的声明 : 2026年2月26日 : 我深信，利用人工智慧来保卫美国及其他民主国家，并击败我们的独裁对手，具有攸关存 : 亡的重要性。 : 因此，Anthropic 一直积极主动地将我们的模型部署到战争部和情报界。我们是第一家在 : 美国政府机密网路中部署模型的前沿 AI 公司，是第一家在国家实验室部署模型的公司， : 也是第一家为国家安全客户提供客制化模型的公司。Claude 被广泛应用於战争部和其他 : 国家安全机构的任务关键型应用中，例如情报分析、建模与模拟、作战计画、网路行动等。 : Anthropic 也采取行动扞卫美国在 AI 领域的领先地位，即使这违背了公司的短期利益。 : 我们选择放弃数亿美元的收入，切断了与中国共产党（其中部分被战争部列为中国军方企 : 业）相关之公司使用 Claude 的管道，关闭了中共支持、企图滥用 Claude 的网路攻击， : 并倡导对晶片实施严格的出口管制，以确保民主国家的优势。 : Anthropic 充分了解，做出军事决定的是战争部，而非私人企业。我们从未对特定的军事 : 行动提出异议，也未曾试图以临时、随意的方式限制我们技术的使用。 : 然而，在少数情况下，我们认为 AI 可能会破坏而非扞卫民主价值观。有些用途也完全超 : 出了当今技术能够安全、可靠执行的范围。有两个此类应用从未包含在我们与战争部的合 : 约中，我们认为现在也不应包含在内： : 大规模国内监控：我们支持将 AI 用於合法的对外情报和反情报任务。但将这些系统 : 用於大规模国内监控与民主价值观背道而驰。由 AI 驱动的大规模监控对我们的基本自由 : 构成了严重且前所未见的风险。尽管目前此类监控在某种程度上是合法的，但这只是因为 : 法律尚未跟上 AI 能力的快速发展。例如，根据现行法律，政府可以在未经授权的情况下 : ，从公开来源购买美国人详细的行踪、网页浏览纪录和社交关系纪录；情报界已承认这种 : 做法引发了隐私疑虑，并在国会引发了跨党派的反对。强大的 AI : 使得将这些分散的、单看似乎无害的个人数据，自动且大规模地拼凑成任何人生活的完整 : 轮廓成为可能。 : 全自动化武器：部分自动化武器（如今日在乌克兰使用的武器）对扞卫民主至关重要 : 。即使是全自动化武器（即完全将人类排除在决策回圈外，自动选择并交战目标的武器） : ，未来也可能对我们的国防至关重要。但时至今日，前沿 AI : 系统的可靠性还不足以驱动全自动化武器。我们不会明知故犯地提供会让美国战士和平民 : 陷入危险的产品。我们曾提议直接与战争部合作进行研发，以提高这些系统的可靠性，但 : 他们没有接受这项提议。此外，若没有适当的监管，就不能指望全自动化武器能发挥我们 : 训练有素的专业部队每天所展现的关键判断力。它们的部署需要配备适当的安全防护机制 : （guardrails），而这些机制目前还不存在。 : 据我们所知，迄今为止，这两个例外情况并未成为我们武装部队加速采用和使用我们模型 : 的障碍。 : 战争部已声明，他们只会与同意「任何合法用途」并移除上述情况中安全机制的 AI 公司 : 签约。他们威胁，如果我们保留这些防护机制，就会将我们从其系统中剔除；他们还威胁 : 要将我们列为「供应链风险（supply chain risk）」（这个标签通常只保留给美国的对 : 手，从未应用於美国公司），并威胁动用《国防生产法》（Defense Production Act）来 : 强制我们移除这些安全机制。後面这两个威胁本质上是矛盾的：一个将我们标记为安全风 : 险；另一个则将 Claude 标记为对国家安全不可或缺的要素。 : 无论如何，这些威胁都不会改变我们的立场：凭着良知，我们无法同意他们的要求。 : 选择最符合其愿景的承包商是战争部的特权。但监於 Anthropic 的技术为我们的武装部 : 队提供了巨大的价值，我们希望他们能重新考虑。我们强烈希望在保留这两项防护机制的 : 前提下，继续为战争部和我们的军人服务。如果战争部选择与 Anthropic 解约，我们将 : 努力协助平稳过渡给另一家供应商，避免对正在进行的军事计画、行动或其他关键任务造 : 成任何干扰。只要有需要，我们的模型将继续根据我们提出的广泛条款提供使用。 : 我们随时准备好继续我们的工作，以支持美国的国家安全。 : 心得/评论： : Anthropic 拿到国防合约 : 正式将OAI 大到不能倒的叙事结束 : 这两家只会有一家留着的话 : 应该是利好亚麻 : OpenAI 应该也有被通知接收 : 而这篇宣告就是控制舆论来让战争部不敢解约给OpenAI的目的 : 任何人接受战争部的合约都等於间接承认监控人民，除了Anthropic : PLTR还有的跌 : ----- : Sent from JPTT on my iPhone ----- Sent from JPTT on my iPhone --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc), 来自: 114.40.244.152 (台湾) ※ 文章网址: https://webptt.com/cn.aspx?n=bbs/Stock/M.1772156797.A.A8F.html ※ 编辑: pujos (114.40.244.152 台湾), 02/27/2026 09:50:14