: 1. Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy : them and replace them with modern buildings? Use specific reasons and : examples to support your opinion. I think a city should try to preserve these old, histotic buildings rather than destroy them, even should preserve without any repair or modification. These old renmants represent a history and culture of a place. It can tell local citizens, their child and everyone come to this town what the special event happended on this city or the developmental history of this place, which is help to let them understand the culture of this town better and impressed. For example, old KaoHsiung railway station which is a important spot of history. KaoHsiung old railway station was been built on 1941, the end of japanese goverance era. The age of building is 68 years. This building has undergone and witness many important historical event, ex. February 28 Incident, the 2nd world war, Formosa Boulevard Incident and so on. To preserve this important spot, the goverment make a 85 meters shift without any destroyed. With the views which mentioned above, we can see the point why a historic old building should be preserved. ... don't know how to make a ending..... -- --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.115.49.60