作者tobia (快乐就满足)
看板Pharmacy
标题Re: [问题] 美沙冬与大麻差别在哪!?
时间Sat Jan 2 19:23:30 2010
※ 引述《tobia (快乐就满足)》之铭言:
: 标题: Re: [问题] 美沙冬与大麻差别在哪!?
: 时间: Sat Jan 2 16:29:04 2010
: Methadone的主要代谢物
: 经由N-demethylation产生 (via CYP3A4)
: 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP)
: 是不活性的代谢物
: 参照
: Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 1973;16:909-13
: The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2008;42:893-7
: 拥有长的半衰期、高的口服生体可用率(85%)、
: 以及不活性的代谢物等
: 是methadone作为替代疗法的优点
: *但是methadone的光学异构特性与个体差异
: 使得它的半衰期变化很大
: (平均23hrs,15-60hrs,甚至可长达120hrs)
: 在剂量的给予及调整上需要谨慎评估
: --
:
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
: ◆ From: 220.129.161.208
: ※ 编辑: tobia 来自: 220.129.161.208 (01/02 17:02)
: 推 obbear:只有经过一次N-demethylation的产物仍有活性 01/02 17:50
: → obbear:在分类上不管是吗啡 大麻 甚至是美沙冬 都被归为成瘾类镇痛 01/02 17:52
: → obbear:剂 不过这一大类的药品 却可依其结构来作次分类 我只是想说 01/02 17:53
: → obbear:美沙冬跟大麻结构以严格角度来看 差很多 01/02 18:14
: 推 DAHOO:不需要用严格的角度来看,基本上这两个结构根本天差地远 01/02 19:12
不好意思 我又来讨论一下~~
参照以下连结: (是free的文章)
Br J Clin Pharmacol 1999;47:403-12
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2014231/?tool=pubmed
这边提到methadone经由单次demethylation之後的产物
非常不稳定
会自动环化并脱水形成EDDP (我将文字贴在最後)
不知道ob大是在那边有找到第一次demethylation的产物仍有活性的资料呢?
以下是转贴节录文字:
Methadone metabolism in humans is complex, with nine metabolites identified
although the data have been qualitative rather than quantitative. Mono
N-demethylation, a primary metabolic pathway, results in the formation of a
highly unstable compound which then undergoes spontaneous cyclization and
dehydration to form 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP)
, which may then be further N-demethylated to 2-ethyl-5-methyl-3,3-
diphenylpyrroline (EMDP) .p-hydroxylation of one aromatic ring has also been
reported, resulting in the formation of four diastereomeric compounds
collectively referred to as p-hydroxy methadone. After oral dosing,
unchanged methadone and EDDP are found in similar amounts in the urine of
humans and account for up to 50% of the dose, with only trace amounts
of EMDP; other metabolites appear to contribute relatively little to the
overall metabolism of methadone, although this has not been well studied,
since complete mass balance has not been achieved.
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 220.129.161.208
1F:推 obbear:= = 谢谢这位先进 我记错了 果然没翻书会变笨 01/02 21:22
2F:→ obbear:前面那篇推文我没办法改 所以希望原PO可以看到这篇 01/02 21:23
3F:→ obbear:果然是教学相长 呵呵 01/02 21:24