作者loveoldbear (gene)
看板PhD
标题Re: [问题] 硕士生投稿期刊求解
时间Wed Jan 16 02:27:15 2019
※ 引述《loveoldbear (gene)》之铭言:
: 大家好!
: (原先留在推文的地方,但我不太会用推文写长的回应,所以就再重发到这了,不好意
思
: !)
: 2018.12.22进度:
: 前天终於鼓起勇气写了封信询问对方期刊稿件状态,刚才老师也回覆给我回信内容,应
该
: 就是reviewer的审稿意见还不够多,目前还处於peer review状态!
: 发现对方语气好诚恳!一直跟我们道歉!
: 我想,我们就继续努力等候吧!
: 信件原文如下:
: Dear xxxxx,
: Thank you for your email and please accept my sincerest apologies for the la
ck
: of update on your paper. We have unfortunately been having problems obtaini
ng
: sufficient reviewer reports as requested by the handling Editor and as such
,
: your manuscript is still going through the peer review process. I completely
: understand that this delay is unacceptable and I cannot apologise enough f
or
: this.
: Please be assured that we are always in regular contact with the handling Ed
it
: or and doing all we can to ensure your manuscript is expedited through the p
ub
: lishing process as swiftly as possible. We hope to get a decision to you soo
n
: and your patience while we do this will be greatly appreciated.
: Please do not hesitate to contact us again if there is anything we may be ab
le
: to help you with, and please accept my apologies once more.
: Kind regards,
: xxxxxxx
: xxxxxxx
: Publishing Assistant
: Scientific Reports
108.01.16更新状态:
刚刚看到状态变成Decision Started了!
可是发现好像又有送出Peer review一次然後再变回Decision Started状态(在同一天内)
!是要被拒的意思吗QQ??
https://i.imgur.com/SZ6QWWi.jpg
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc), 来自: 42.72.33.65
※ 文章网址: https://webptt.com/cn.aspx?n=bbs/PhD/M.1547576837.A.677.html
1F:推 xiix: GG! 01/16 10:26
2F:推 zxp9505007: comment不够 再多给几个审?还是有人拒审? 01/16 11:52
3F:→ loveoldbear: 现在不是已经在decision started了?我认为comment 01/16 12:00
4F:→ loveoldbear: 应该已经够了(?),但我不知道为何最後再次出现一次pe 01/16 12:00
5F:→ loveoldbear: er review,再变成decision started? 01/16 12:00
6F:推 cssu: Decision started有可能是系统判断已经收到足够的reviewer c 01/16 12:48
7F:→ cssu: omments, 比如说送三个已经回来两个,但主编有可能想等第三 01/16 12:48
8F:→ cssu: 个或是主编觉得意见不够他判断,有想再找reviewer看,所以 01/16 12:48
9F:→ cssu: 状态会停在Decision started,但其实还在等意见回来 01/16 12:48
10F:→ saltlake: 同楼上。文章的科学正确性是最终标准,特殊状况下,主编 01/16 13:07
11F:→ saltlake: 有权限临时增加稿审数目。例如常态两三人可能增到三四人 01/16 13:07
12F:→ saltlake: 等。这种案例不多,但非没有。 01/16 13:08
13F:推 anr2: 正面看待 即便被拒 好好参考comments 修改 都有机会 01/16 15:00
14F:推 narwhale: 我有遇过增加reviewer的情况,最初只有两位,他们的问题 01/18 20:03
15F:→ narwhale: 我都在response letter回覆了想说应该要接受了,但主编 01/18 20:05
16F:→ narwhale: 又找了第三位reviewer来审我修改过的稿子,当时的状态就 01/18 20:06
17F:→ narwhale: Ready for Decision变回Reviewer Invited 01/18 20:07
18F:推 xiix: 真的很奇怪 01/18 21:38