作者smallrainy (小雨)
看板PhD
标题[问题] 关於投稿accept後又reject
时间Mon Jul 4 20:06:32 2016
各位先进想请问一下
在前几个礼拜所投稿的paper被通知说accept了,
不过就在今天却又寄了一封信,
Our referees are asked to make a judgement based on whether rapid publication
of the paper would benefit the profession. Consequently this is not a value
judgement on your work, but an expression of suitability for this journal.
Also, since we regard speed as being of paramount importance, referees are
permitted to make binary decisions without providing comments for authors. We
are therefore unable to advise authors on the reason for a rejection.
上面的叙述实在不是很懂问题出在哪,感觉就是临时又反悔所以reject
不知道是否有板友可以提供问题点出在哪边?
接受信的内容
Thank you for revising your paper for IET Power Electronics. I am pleased to
accept the paper for publication since the criticisms of the reviewers have
now been answered.
The IET now offers authors an Open Access publication option alongside our
standard Subscription Access. The standard Subscription Access option
involves you assigning copyright to the publisher. If you choose the Open
Access option you will retain the copyright for your work by selecting one of
four Creative Commons Licences. Please be aware that if you choose an Open
Access licence there is an Article Processing Charge (APC) of $1,450. The APC
may be covered by the same funding that you would receive for your research,
and some institutions have funding set aside to fund open access publishing.
Please see our Author Guide for more information:
http://digital-library.theiet.org/journals/author-guide
You will be contacted shortly asking you to take a decision and sign either a
copyright or licence form.
Your paper is ready to be typeset. Once the proofs are ready, you will be
sent a notification asking you to view them and make any corrections needed.
Thank you for your interest in the journal.
Yours sincerely
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc), 来自: 61.227.101.116
※ 文章网址: https://webptt.com/cn.aspx?n=bbs/PhD/M.1467633994.A.1C1.html
1F:推 reluctant: 他好像在说suitability,但我以为这个问题第一时间就会 07/04 20:22
2F:→ reluctant: 被解决。不太懂为什麽都审完了才用suitability拒绝。 07/04 20:23
3F:→ reluctant: 是这个期刊的审稿流程不太一样吗? 07/04 20:24
4F:推 FSGuitar: 前面接受信可以看看吗? 07/04 20:56
※ 编辑: smallrainy (61.227.101.116), 07/04/2016 21:28:35
5F:推 mulkcs: 写信去确认一下吧 感觉很怪 07/04 21:43
6F:推 FSGuitar: 这样有点夸张了...这已经是在玩弄作者了 07/04 21:57
7F:→ FSGuitar: 假如他们没有搞错的话 建议写封信确认一下 07/04 21:58
8F:→ GoldLight: 可以写信去问,我遇过误发的状况 07/04 22:45
9F:→ caseypie: 第一段就是信的全部了吗?感觉好像只是在说明作业程序 07/05 00:00
10F:推 jerk: 反正这期刊被SCI踢掉了,没上可能还是好事一件,如果毕业需 07/07 21:40
11F:→ jerk: 要点数。 07/07 21:40
12F:→ emitter: 怎麽看一个期刊要被踢掉了呢? 07/08 00:20
14F:→ emitter: 抱歉我看错了,我以为他是说"要"被踢掉了 07/11 00:48