原文恕删~ 想借标题问一下我自己的情形 今年三月我丢了第一篇paper出去 五月底的时候收到第一次的feedback 两个reviewer的意见都还算正面，问了一些问题我也都能完整的回答 所以修改之後就再送出去了 然後今天收到第二次的feedback 前面这两个reviewer都说OK，而且recommend to publish 但是.....多了第三个reviewer，他是这样写的 The efficiency of this type of XXXX was slightly improved compared to conventional XXXX but its application to industrial or power plant installations seems to be limited (see the following comments). Although the paper falls within the scope of the journal , is timely and original, and the results are of practical importance for application to XXXX, I do not recommend the manuscript for publication in the Journal of XXXX due to the following reasons: *我自己看起来，这些理由跟其他两位reviewer在第一次feedback写的理由"动机"满像的 *都是希望我改或增加一些东西。只是不知道为什麽他马上就说not recommend *而且我的东西本来就是要主打non-industrial applications，不知道为什麽他一直打 *我的东西在industry不是很有用 主编的email在一开头的内文就写 Dear Mr., I regret to inform you that the reviewers of your manuscript have advised against publication of your paper at this time. For your guidance, the reviewers' comments are included below. If you feel that you can provide a greatly revised paper that incorporates all of the reviewers' suggestions and addresses all concerns, I invite you to resubmit your work. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. Sincerely yours, Associate Editor 应该是很清楚的拒绝我了 不知道这样还需要花时间在这个journal上吗? 还是赶紧投别的? 像这种情形，如果要改投别的期刊，那manuscript需要改过再投吗? 还是原封不动的丢出去就好? 第一篇paper就被拒绝，没甚麽经验，请大家指教 谢谢 ps 主编自己在这个领域也是有做过一些东西(理论派)，我有reference过他一些文章 不过我这篇全部都是在讲实验，就是一个新的机构 --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc), 来自: 76.104.182.108 ※ 文章网址: http://webptt.com/cn.aspx?n=bbs/PhD/M.1407695464.A.642.html