作者yc2579 (yc2579)
看板PhD
标题Re: [问题] 要求当共同作者？
时间Tue Apr 15 22:07:09 2014
※ 引述《lloydbacon (培根)》之铭言：
: 如题
: 老板前一阵子做跟助理做的东西结果非常不好
: 我听了几次他们的讨论後有次给了建议
: 请他们对於某个现象的分析方法参考另一篇paper的作法
: (此篇paper是去年的paper 虽出於大师之手 但国内知道的人不多)
: 神奇的是老师跟助理参考这篇paper之後
: 结果是好的令人难以置信
: 应该很快就可以开始写paper了
: 我想请问的是
: 我该跟老板要要个共同作者挂名吗？
: 以前我是没这个观念
: 但自从千里马去了美国後
: 美国老师的作法是
: 有哪一位他要好的老师或是研究员给了帮助论文的建议
: 他就让那位老师/研究员挂名
: 所以我该跟老师说说看吗？
: PS 老板平常对我不错 只是对於paper挂名这件事他没主动提过
整理自 NIH 的学术伦理指引:
http://ppt.cc/Kt0L
1. Authorship should be reserved for individuals who have met all of the
following conditions:
a. Made a significant contribution to the conception and design or the
analysis and interpretation of data.
b. Participated in drafting the article or reviewing and/or revising it for
intellectual content.
c. Approved the final version of the manuscript.
d. Exceptions may be appropriate for deceased authors (denoted in the
manuscript with a footnote reporting their death).
2. Examples of contributors and contributions that do not merit authorship:
a. Those who only assisted the research by their encouragement and advice
(for example, thesis committee members, lab members or others who
provide substantial suggestions during a committee meeting, lab meeting
or seminar).
b. Those who provided only space, financial support, reagents, occasional
analyses or patient materials.
c. Providing materials in and of itself does not constitute sufficient grounds
for authorship.
心得:
提供技术建议是不符合作者定义的
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc), 来自: 209.124.163.42
※ 文章网址: http://webptt.com/cn.aspx?n=bbs/PhD/M.1397570832.A.41C.html
1F：推 NotUniqueSol:这个好 值得m 04/15 23:25
2F：→ MasterChang:所以应该藏起来自己用才是!?(误) 04/15 23:54
3F：→ tainanuser:推 04/16 08:39
4F：推 cct211:ideas are cheap and abundant, execution is everything. 04/21 04:19
5F：推 ysc1213:我想请问,就人文学科而言, 有参与撰写论文的话呢? 04/21 18:31