其实我这篇已经被退一次了~~~而且这是我第一篇写的论文 我也清楚因为是第一篇 其实是很生疏的~~~ 我觉得重写一篇还比我修改这篇要来得简单..... 可是我又不想放弃这篇的IDEA...... 也有点挣扎说到底该怎麽办呢?这下变成鸡肋了~~~~>_<...... 我还有一篇也正在审稿中 本来我跟老板也蛮看好第4篇的 想说这一篇比较差的如果上了 就百分之百OK了 没想到还是被DECLINED了...... ※ 引述《kenet2 (挣扎中的博班生~~)》之铭言： : 除了我自己的疏忽外~~~ : 这个reviewer真的觉得我的文章写得粉烂吧~~~~ : JPP我也已经上了两篇了~~没想到第3篇打击这麽大~~~~~ : 再找别篇期刊吧~~~~~ : Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author: : Reviewer: 1 : Comments to the Author : Written English needs vast improvement. At present the grammar/language is : of an unacceptably low quality. : References. Ref 2: Herman, K. should by Krier, H. - you've got the names : backwards. Ref 3: you have a problem with the quotations. : Refs 4-8 are completely unrelated to the present work; : they are just FEM papers in different thermal stress applications. : Reference work relevant to your manuscript. : Previous work on FEM/thermal calculations and stress/thermal measurements : in rocket motors, insulators, and propellant grains. : Value. What is the value or novelty of this work? : The authors have applied a heat transfer condition to the inside of : an annulus and performed a black box ANSYS FEM calculation for the : stress distribution in the annulus. In my opinion, this is not a : publishable result but rather an undergraduate student project. : The results are not generalized for non-specific materials, : variation in motor case thickness, etc. : I see very little value in this work. The limited results are specific : to the chosen parameters : and this can be easily done by nearly anyone with ANSYS and a BS : in mechanical engineering. : Technical. What is the applied pressure on the insulator? I assume zero. : This is purely a thermal stress calculation? Why vary insulator thickness : but not also motor case thickness? Won't this influence the 0.6 cm : thickness criteria for insulator thickness? Why the sharp changes in : stress in the first 4 seconds? You should show a thermal : loading (temperature, heat flux, other) graph to explain. : But my biggest problem is that this work lacks value for nearly all readers. : This is simple black box FEM analysis on a thermally loaded annulus. : Reviewer: 2 : Comments to the Author : (There are no comments.) --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 219.70.5.61 ※ 编辑: kenet2 来自: 219.70.5.61 (11/05 18:14)