1.期刊: Green chemistry 2.结果: minor revised--> accepted 3.reviewer数目: 2 过程: 老板觉得这次的题目创意性够 因此和老板讨论後一开始先决定尝试往高点数期刊投稿 反正被打枪就算了，就当作是经验吧! 於是就各别往这些期刊投稿 a. Angewandte Chemie International Edition: b. Journal of the American Chemical Society 之前早有耳闻这类期刊审稿速度很快，就算被rejected 也不会太浪费时间 投稿出去後，果然都只要一天就回来了 主编觉得应用性太"specific" 没经过外审，直接rejected c. Advanced materials 这次的审稿时间大概三个礼拜，还以为进入外审阶段，有机会了!! 不过回来之後，结果也是一样主编内审结果，直接rejected 理由也是一样"specific application" 不过这位主编还推荐了另一个期刊给我参考 以下是mail内容: "> Thank you for submitting the above-mentioned manuscript. > > Regretfully, I must inform you that the manuscript will not be considered > further for ADVANCED MATERIALS. > > The reasons for this are that we receive considerably more papers than we > can possibly publish in the limited available space, and that the results > and content of your manuscript seem to be more suitable for a polymer > science-related journal. Therefore what I recommend is that the manuscript is considered for our > journal Macromolecular Rapid Communications (http://www.mrc-journal.de), > which is the journal of choice for rapid publication of high priority > results in the field of polymer science and ranks 2nd by Impact Factor > (2009 IF: 4.3) among all journals predominantly publishing original > research in general polymer science. > The Editor of Macromolecular Rapid Communications has agreed to this > suggestion and would be happy to have your manuscript reviewed for this > journal. > > If you choose to follow this suggestion, please upload your manuscript as > a new submission to Macromolecular Rapid Communications using > http://www.manuscriptxpress.com. In your cover letter, please mention this > correspondence to expedite the handling of your manuscrip 後来老板觉得如果参考他的期刊投稿，还不是要经过审查 而且也会有被rejected的可能，在考虑IF点数下，决定不考虑这期刊 继续往下投，首先比较了Chem.commun. Anal.Chem. 及Green.Chem 的IF，以及这次实验的主题与期刊scopes，最後决定Green chemistry 在cover letter中强调这次实验的重点及其应用性 最後提出建议的reviewer有三位 1.Prof. Thomas Welton 2.Prof. Vivek Polshettiwar 3.Prof. Alejandro Cifuentes 前两位算是与我这次实验有关领域之大师 11/12 submission--> 12/3 回信内容: minor revised I am pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been recommended for publication in Green Chemistry subject to revision in line with the attached reports 接着是reviewer的问题 第一位先说明accept的理由: "This is a greatly improved synthetic methodology resulting in ........, Therefore, I favour publication as a communication in green chemistry." 接着提出五个问题，补一个ref. ，在讨论中补上几句话 都不算太刁难 第二位reviewer完全没问题，并称赞了一下，真是受宠若惊 "It is well-written and an excellent piece of work.... I recommend its publication in Green Chemistry. " 12/7 revised manuscript 12/8 收到accepted letter，速度真是快!! "Thank you for submitting your revised manuscript. I am satisfied with the changes you have made, and I am therefore pleased to inform you that your paper has been accepted for publication in Green Chemistry." --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.135.56.103