作者Esp (默默地做靛靛的看)
看板PhD
标题Re: 全国研究生助学金 陈情书 (一封公开信)
时间Sun Dec 25 19:39:37 2005
有没人 可以列一下
在台北念研究所
一个月的开销(住宿费+便当钱+...)
和
从学校拿到的助学金
有个数字 就可以 比得 比较清楚
住宿费:5000-6000 (不包刮 住所的网路费+第四台费用+ 很倒楣的没有抽到宿舍)
吃饭钱:70*3*30=6300
这两笔只是初估 可以刻苦一点 好歹也要个1.1万
以台大为例
学校给的,以台大 可能有人拿到的 5000打6折=3000
实验室 有人 0 有人3000 有人跟的老师比较有钱 6000以上
那大概拿到的钱 6000吧
以上 当然是我就以我目前所看到的大概 有人过的可以比以上好
但我想也有人过的比以上不好
以上支出和收入来比
能有很多人当全职的学生吗? 当研究生的人没当过家教的人有多少,
没打过工的人有多少
对一学生开源的方式 兼家教是很普遍的
当然花在研究的时间和心思也少了
我不介意学校究竟给学生多少
但是 学生逐年多收 学校给的学生的钱竟然还要打折 ><"
※ 引述《lerudit (l'Erudit)》之铭言:
: ※ 引述《gashchou (头在晕)》之铭言:
: : 政府的教育经费年年是在往下删减,虽然有弄一些啥子五年五百亿的经费,想要让一
: : 些大学能挤入世界百大,但是整体而言,研究经费并未能增加许多。许多老师们的研
: : 究经费也都往下缩减,研究生人数往上增加,如此的经费要如何去帮助研究生能有基
: : 本的生活开销。
: Basically, the living cost is actually a personal problem rather than a public
: issue. There is no relationship between the living cost (whether the government
: supports or not) and the research quality.
: Everybody, except babies, got to pay their living cost by themselves.
: If you go to look at the history,
: you probably would be surprised that how many great scientists actually
: struggled in poverty. Of course some of them are rich.
: Anyway, they all changed this world by their great contributions.
: What about you? Postgraduates! What are you going to do after getting supports?
: Also, from the name of the money; that is a sort of charity!
: Is anyone going to protest for getting more charity money?!
: Com'on, Postgraduates! What are you doing?
: ==
: For the university management and funding sources,
: I don't think the current government has so much money can do this.
: The only way to gather the money is basically to reform the tax rates.
: This issue has already been discussed in the last few years.
: The current government also promised to do this as well.
: However, as all the other non-delivered promises,
: I cannot expect they will do this by 2008.
: (We got so many great election runners, rather than great government runners
: or good managers.)
: From the other view, the high educational system now has already been twisted
: to an American style. The universities are now almost independent from the
: government's control, and, therefore, should not ask more money from the
: government. Conversely, in the past, like EU, the government ran the
: universities and, therefore, supported them and controlled them.
: This is a sort of interest-duty balance. You cannot ask something from nothing.
: If the universities wants to get supports from the taxpayers, they should
: be under control of the taxpayers (the government) as well.
: Else, they should go away, get their own money and manage themselves.
: The other problem, as I have already stated many times, the national
: universities have never done good management on their funding.
: Look at your universities,
: Do they charge their students for printing? or set a quota for the students?
: Do they monitor the uses of the Internet? If the answer is yes, has anyone
: downloading mp3 or whatever got punishment from the university?
: Have your universities installed auto-controlled switches for saving the power?
: Have your universities control the uses of telephones for just study purposes?
: How about the wonderful (and expensive) flat monitors in the central offices?
: Are they required or more important than your research equipment?
: Do the lecturers need to pay for their car parking in the campus?
: .....
: Gentlemen, have you noticed we are talking about several billion dollars?
: Those techniques have already existed in the markets and no longer expensive.
: Most of the top universities in the world have already done this for ages.
: Oh, excuse me, gentlemen. I just noticed one they have done:
: Some of them must have saved a lot of money from the human labour cost by
: asking their undergraduate students to clean their campus (I should say 'force',
: because if the students refuse to do this, they cannot get their degrees!)
: I personally have not yet seen this been done anywhere else in the world.
: Is that a smart action? Gentlemen.
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.229.22.243
1F:→ lerudit:So what? Is that the taxpayers' problem? 12/25 19:58
2F:→ lerudit:You want a master degree. you pay the cost. that's all 12/25 20:24
3F:推 ghjkl:I agree with lerudit 12/29 17:17