作者madgame (静)
看板Patent
标题Re: [问题] 美国专利112之核驳的问题
时间Mon Apr 1 23:36:25 2013
※ 引述《lili ()》之铭言：
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 211.72.92.145
1F：→ VanDeLord:你比较倒楣 04/01 13:06
2F：→ VanDeLord:已公开前案不就代表已知技术领域 +.+ 04/01 13:07
3F：→ forcomet:你的美国案的确是这样没错 因为你写了D 所以要负面排除 04/01 13:23
4F：→ forcomet:必须要说明书有提到 但是如果你说明书没提到D 你的负面 04/01 13:23
5F：→ forcomet:排除是有相当大的机会成功, CN的部分 就比较意外 04/01 13:24
6F：→ forcomet:因为CN对於支持的要求是到了吹毛求疵的地步 EP的话只要 04/01 13:24
7F：→ forcomet:有适当的解释 EP审委接受度是高的 关於US的部分 建议可 04/01 13:25
8F：→ forcomet:一并参考MPEP 2144的部分 04/01 13:26
9F：→ forcomet:眼残 看错 可能要用别的方式去避开D, ex: only 04/01 13:33
10F：→ forcomet:你引的MPEP後面还有一段文字 04/01 13:45
11F：推 piglauhk:谢谢分享 04/01 15:13
12F：推 kaikai1112:推推推 04/01 15:29
13F：推 zweisteine:感谢指正与分享 04/01 16:35
14F：推 madgame:日本几乎跟台湾一样宽松 允许直接排除与前案重叠的范围 04/01 23:26
15F：→ madgame:此外，日本和欧洲有特别写明，允许排除「不可专利的标的」 04/01 23:26
http://www.jpo.go.jp/tetuzuki_e/t_tokkyo_e/1312-002_e.htm
日本审查基准的英文版
关於 disclaimer 的部份在 Part III
http://www.jpo.go.jp/tetuzuki_e/t_tokkyo_e/Guidelines/3.pdf
The amendment to provide a “disclaimer” in the following (i) and (ii) does
not introduce new technical matters, and the amendment is permitted.
(i) If the claimed invention overlaps with the prior art and is thus likely
to lose novelty, etc. (Article 29(1)(iii), Article 29bis or Article 39),
making an amendment to exclude only the overlap while leaving the expression
of the statement of matters stated in claims before amendment
(ii) If the claimed invention includes the term “human being” and thus does
not satisfy the requirement of the main paragraph of Article 29(1), or falls
under unpatentable grounds provided in Article 32, and said reason for refusal
is eliminated by exclusion of the term “human being,”making an amendment
to exclude only the term “human being” while leaving an expression of the
statement of matters stated in claims before amendment
参考看看
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 219.85.196.7