※ [本文转录自 UTAH-JAZZ 看板] 作者: K0BEJ0RDAN (科比乔丹) 看板: UTAH-JAZZ 标题: [外电] Too early to compare Suns' Nash to Stockton 时间: Sat Jun 3 10:48:02 2006 原文网址:http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,635212347,00.html Compared to the praise being heaped on Steve Nash during this year's playoffs, the memory of John Stockton seems downright quaint.Remember when announcers were speaking in similar tones about Stockton? Maybe not. Athletes , like pop stars, come and go. That's not to say Stockton was merely a flavor of the month. But after watching Shawn Kemp outplay Karl Malone one night in the 1990s, a Seattle area writer said to me: "Looks like we may be witnessing the passing of the torch." 与这季的playoffs中赞赏声不断的Steve Nash相比，John Stockton带给我们的回忆 似乎显得更为离奇。 还记得当时的发布者用相同的口吻来形容Nash与Stockton吗?但事实或许并非如此， 运动员就像电视上看到的明星一样，有的只是红极一时，来的快去的也快。不过我们 应该也不会说Stockton就是那些只出一张专辑的一片歌手吧。但在90年代的一场比赛 中我看到Shawn Kemp击败了Karl Malone，而在赛後西亚图当地的一位作者对我这麽 说:"或许我们将见证一位闪亮巨星发光的过程"。 For a year or two it almost seemed possible. Now, of course, it only looks silly. Kemp ended up impersonating a blowfish while Malone became the second-leading scorer of all time. That's how it goes. We tend to get bogged down in the here and now. To a starving man, the best meal he's ever tasted is the most recent. Which raises the question: Who is/was the better point guard, Nash or Stockton? I can answer that . . . in about a decade. 在那一两年看来似乎的确是如此。但对於现在的我们来说，那说法却是愚蠢至极。 因为当Malone成为了NBA史上得分第二高的球员时，Kemp却让我们觉得他只是个披 着人皮的河豚。世事就是如此，人们总是会为了现阶段的某些事情而堕落下去。 对於一个有野心，积极进取的球员来说，把握当下就是最好的享受。 这也让我们连想到一个问题:到底Nash和Stockton谁才是比较优秀的控球後卫呢? 现在我还不能回答你们，但十年後或许我能给你个答案。 As the Phoenix Suns continue their quest for a championship, it is obvious that Nash is a phenomenal player. (By the way, who styles his hair, Tom Petty?) It's hard to watch him and not summon the well-worn description of "Best Point Guard Ever, Not Named Magic," or "The Best Pure Point Guard." That's what they used to say about Stockton. Right now, though, it's hard to argue against Nash. He is averaging 20 points and 10 assists in the playoffs and is making the Dallas Mavericks wish he would just leave basketball and join a grunge band. 以目前太阳队能够迈向NBA总冠军来说，Nash的确是个很杰出的球员。(对了，是谁设计 他的发型的?是Tom Petty吗?)。很难看着Nash打球却不连想到那些所谓的称号---- "最佳控卫不再是Magic Johnson了"或是"最佳纯种控卫不再是John Stockton了"。 以目前的情形来说，你很难去否决掉Nash，因为他在playoffs中的平均得分是20，而助 攻也达到10，并且他也使得小牛队很希望Nash能够去组个地下乐团而别来打篮球。 Nash has won two MVP's, while Stockton didn't win any. His career 3-point percentage and free throw percentages are ahead of Stockton's, and their career scoring averages are nearly identical. Still, Stockton remains the all-time NBA assists and steals leader. His field goal accuracy is nearly four percentage points better than Nash's. While Stockton was a consummate "pass-first" player, Nash is a scoring point guard. Stockton considered it his duty to get the ball to Malone in scoring position; Nash often looks to shoot first. 与Stockton相比起来，Nash拿了两次的MVP，但Stockton一次也没有。Nash的3分命中 率与罚球命率也都比Stockton要来的高，而他们两位的生涯平均得分也很相近。 然而，Stockton仍是NBA史上的助攻王及抄截王，并且他的投篮命中率也比Nash高了 有4%之多。而当Stockton被视为是一个以传球为优先的球员时，Nash则是被视为一 个擅於得分的控卫。Stockton总是认为的他的首要任务就是要将球传给Malone来得分， 而Nash则是常常以自已有没有机会投篮为优先。 Both are superb passers and masters at making teammates better. Yet the temptation is to rush to judgment, especially while Nash is front and center. But even in Stockton's glory days there were challengers. Mark Price was the Cleveland guard who for a few years was a considerable worry for Stockton's. But he never came close to Stockton's career. Gary Payton was more than enough trouble for Stockton for several seasons. He had determination, attitude and talent. He may even end up in the Hall of Fame. But he'll never be considered a better guard than Stockton. 他们两位都是非常会传球的好手，而且也是个能使球队打的更好的球员。 尤於Nash是现阶段NBA中控卫打的最突出的球员，所以最让人期待的还是这个话题的 结论:到底他们两谁才是更好的控卫? 不过就算是Stockton在那最辉煌的时刻，仍是有许多的竞争对手。骑士队的後卫Mark Price就给Stockton带来了些许的困扰，但Price的成就仍与Stockton相差甚远。 相较之下，Gary Payton所带给Stockton的麻烦就大多了。Payton有坚强的意志， 积极的态度及过人的天赋，他甚至也很有可能成为名人堂的一员。但Payton却也从来 没有被视为一个比Stockton更好的後卫。 In the late '80s and early '90s, Phoenix's Kevin Johnson occasionally ate Stockton for lunch. But not over the long run. Golden State guard Tim Hardaway's crossover dribble thwarted Stockton at times, but not for long. Later came Nash, New Jersey's Jason Kidd and Sacramento's Mike Bibby. Great guards, one and all. 在80年代後期和90年代初期，太阳队的Kevin Johnson也偶尔曾把Stockton吃假的， 但时间也不长。当时勇士队的後卫Tim Hardaway的crossover也常常过了Stockton， 但时间也同样不长。之後就是Nash，篮网的Jason Kidd和国王队的Mike Bibby。 几乎攘括了所有伟大的後卫。 But over a 19-year career, Stockton accomplished more than any of them. He was a 10-time All-Star (Nash has four All-Star appearances), ranks second all-time in games played and has the fourth-best field goal percentage of any guard in history (behind Lewis Lloyd, Maurice Cheeks and Magic Johnson). He helped his team to the playoffs in each of his 19 seasons. 但在Stockton职业生涯的19年之间，他的成就比任何以上的球员都还要伟大。 他10次入选明星赛(Nash则有4次)，打的球赛场数排名NBA史上第二，而他的投篮命中率 也是NBA史上第四高(仅输给Lewis Lloyd，Maurice Cheeks，和Magic Johnson)。 在他职业生涯的19年之间，Stockton每年都帮助爵士队打进季後赛。 Nash is the best point guard in the game today. He has been in the league 10 years. If he keeps up his pace, he will surely be a Hall of Fame selection. Most important, if he leads the Suns to an NBA title he'll be one up on Stockton in that department. But to say he's a better guard than Stockton right now requires a longer perspective. Another nine years, in fact. Let's put it to a vote in 2015. Nash无疑是当前最好的控球後卫，他在NBA也有十年之久了，而如果Nash能够继续维持下 去，那麽进入名人堂也是迟早的事。最重要的是假如Nash能够带领太阳拿下NBA总冠军， 那麽他在这点上面和Stockton相较之下会占得比较多的优势。 但是要说他是个比Stockton还要好的後卫还太早了点，我们必须长期观察下来才能得到 结论。或许再9年後，让我们在2015年时再下这个结论吧~ 翻不好的地方还请见谅 --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 61.216.24.230 ※ 编辑: K0BEJ0RDAN 来自: 61.216.24.230 (06/03 10:58) --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 61.216.24.230