首先，第一部份这算是过期已久的外电，原文在溜马官网上： http://www.nba.com/pacers/news/question_archive.html 内容主要是球迷问到Granger是否该增重的问题（应该是看到对Nets的惨况XD），以及 他的位置问题，因为看到Chinapacers.com有Bird对Granger的不足之处一些看法，所以 翻译一下。 第二部分就是Chinapacers.com上Bird提到有关Granger的部分。 Q. (Danny) Granger played the three and four spots this year and did a pretty good job for a rookie. He also defended players like Kobe (Bryant), Vince Carter, Richard Jefferson, and Paul Pierce, just to name a few. One analyst here in Sacramento said that if this kid adds 10 to 15 pounds of muscle he could be a nightmare for other teams. I think if he adds the muscle it will improve his post-up game as well as make life much tougher on the guys he will defend next year. What do you think? (From Kirven in Sacramento, Calif.) Q. Granger今年打过3号跟4号位置，而且对一个新人来说他算是打的挺不错的。他防守 过Kobe、Vince Carter、Richard Jefferson和Paul Pierce及其他球员。一个在沙加缅度 的球评曾说假如这个孩子增加10-15磅的肌肉，他将会是其他各队的梦魇。我想假如他多 一些肌肉将可以增强他的低位进攻，而明年他所防守的球员日子也会太好过。你认为呢？ A. This answer hinges on how you view Granger's NBA future. If you believe he is best suited to play both forward spots, then it would seem reasonable for him to bulk up a bit in order to better contend with power forwards. My belief is he is better suited to shooting guard as a secondary position and not power forward. 这个答案决定於你怎麽看待Granger的NBA未来。假如你相信他在两个前锋是最适合的，那 增点重去跟其他大前锋放对似乎是蛮合理的。但我相信他比较适合把得分後卫当作第二个 位置，而非大前锋。 At 6-9 and 228 pounds, Granger already has an ideal frame for a small forward. His primary physical attributes are quickness, athleticism and footwork. As you mentioned, he has defended shooting guards and small forwards with some effectiveness, showing potential to become a perimeter stopper as he learns the nuances of the game as well as the tendencies of his opponents. Offensively, he has the mid-range and 3-point shooting to blend with the abilities to either post up or drive. To my way of thinking, his skill set screams swingman. 6-9加上228磅，Granger已经有一个小前锋的理想框架。他主要的体能优势是敏捷、运动性 及脚步。你应该注意过，他在防守得分後卫与小前锋上比较有效果，并且展现了成为外围 防守终结者（perimeter stopper）的潜力，只要他能更懂得比赛并且能预测对手的行动。 在进攻上，他具备的中距离及三分线能力能够让他结合体能优势去打低位或进行切入。 在我看来，他的技巧与天赋在在说明了他应当是一个锋卫摇摆人。 He played semi-regularly as a power forward out of necessity his rookie season and struggled mightily against the bigger bodies. To add bulk could mean two things: it could slow him down, mitigating the advantages of his athleticism, as well as increasing the risk for injury because the extra load his legs must carry. I don't think it's a coincidence that Jermaine O'Neal's two injury-plagued seasons came after he bulked up from 250 to 265, and I'd expect to see him back at his former playing weight in 2006-07. 他在新秀球季不可避免的需要半常态性打些大前锋的位置，并且跟那些大个子努力抗衡。 增重意味着两件事情：他的速度会减慢，导致减少他在运动力上的优势，以及因为脚部 的负担加大而增加受伤的风险。我就认为小欧会在他从250磅增重到265磅後连续两个球季 有伤痛困扰不会是一个巧合而已，我也预期小欧会在2006-07球季回到他原本的体重。 I understand your point, and do believe Granger should work to increase his strength – but not his bulk. To do the latter would be an attempt to turn him into something he is not, and those types of experiments generally fail. 我了解你的论点，也确实相信Granger应该努力去增加他身体的强度--但绝非是增重。 增重是企图在他身上加些不属於他的东西，而这种实验通常都是失败收场的。 以下为Bird的发言： Q：你认为Danny Granger暑假应该怎样补课？ A：我想Danny跟我一个暑假。很多东西他可以改进的，他是一个很有才华的球员，但 Danny和David Harrison都知道自己要做什麽。David过去两年都在这里，今年暑假 也一样，很卖力去练，他喜欢这样来改善自己。至於Danny，他的控球要改进，还 有我发觉他开始沉迷射三分。我宁愿他多点像大学时那样背篮攻，他有很多板斧的 ，只是需要磨利。 Q：Granger可以打得分後卫吗？ A：我已经听过Rick提过几次，在防守上，我想他的确做得到。但Danny Granger是非常 优秀的三号位球员，你可以在防守时摆他在二号位一段时间，也可以客串四号位，但 未来我觉得他最好的位置是三号位。明年，他可以打35分钟一场。 Q：如果和Stojakovic续约了，怎麽保证那麽长时间？ A：他可以打三个位置，所以上阵时间是不用担心的。 --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.123.201.102 ※ 编辑: Granger33 来自: 59.113.217.102 (05/21 21:17)