大意：原本夺命女的操作方式没得到应有的代价，NERF。 原文： http://us.battle.net/forums/en/overwatch/topic/20745186024?page=3#post-42 没多久就3X页了 正反两派战翻天 ============================================================================== Making the sure game feels responsive and smooth is very important to us. Wherever we can, we make sure that the game responds to player input asap. However, the one situation where we have to step in and possibly slow things down is when an 'animation canceling' trick is discovered and allows players to significantly increase a characters power. There are two main problems with just leaving these things in the game as they are. 我们非常重视英雄操作对玩家的回馈与流畅感，但是当有些"取消动画"的技巧能让英雄 威力显着提升时，我们就会考虑调整英雄让操作慢下来。 而如果不对这些问题做调整，可能会产生两样问题。 1. This trick becomes the new balance of the hero. Lets say there is a trick that somehow allowed you to instantly complete McCree's roll instead of waiting for it to complete normally. At that point, the character is much stronger, and might suddenly be a balancing problem. The choices then becomes either fix that bug, or allow it to exist and reduce his power elsewhere. If we decide to reduce his power elsewhere, unless you know how to do this special (and often unintuitive) trick, he will never feel correctly powerful for you. 2. Learning a hero now has to include learning how to abuse these bugs. This is a huge turn off to a lot of players, and can turn a potential favorite hero into a 'will never pick'. 1. 这些"技巧"会改变英雄现有的平衡。假设来说，如果McCree的翻滚能利用取消动画的 技巧让翻滚动作提早完成，显然McCree会OP不少。这时如果我们选择让这个技巧继续留 在脚色上，我们就只能从别的地方去平衡他。 这样变成如果你不会用这些"不直觉"的操作，你就注定是个铜牌麦卡利。 2. 学习一个脚色的时候，这些小技巧因此变成不得不学习的东西。影响到一个玩家对这 些脚色的游玩意愿。 To speak to Widow's scope canceling trick specifically, when I first saw it it seemed fine. The idea was that you are slowing down your fire rate slightly to gain a little more situational awareness and a small movement bump between shots, that is fine as a trade off. But the problem came about once I looked into it a bit more and realized that the recovery time (the time between shots) is 0.5 seconds, so as long as you scoped back in within 0.5 seconds of your last shot, it didn't 'cost' you anything. That, in turn, means the *correct* way to play her is to always scope out and back in within 0.5s of every shot, otherwise you are playing a weaker Widowmaker. 再来谈到Widowmaker这次开关镜改动，一开始我注意到这件事的时候认为没什麽问题。 就只是玩家牺牲了一点开火频率，换取比较多的视野资讯和一些机动性。但是当我更深入 研究这个问题的时候，才发现WM的开火间隔是0.5秒，因此旧版的开关镜技巧不会让你损 失任何东西。 结果就是"正确"的操作WM的方式变成每枪的0.5秒间格中都开关镜，不然你就是个比 较差的夺命女。 We talked about adding in some cost to force it to be more of a trade off, such as delaying the recovery time when you scope out. That would mean when you scoped back in you would have to wait the remaining 0.5s before you were allowed to start charging or shoot again. Solutions like that often feel even worse and are generally confusing, so we tend not to go those directions. In general, we're not against player discovered tricks, in fact we love watching players jump in and find this cool stuff! For example, Widowmaker wasn't initially designed with the ability to be able to launch herself off a ledge while grappling up, but that one was left in because it is pretty easy to do (press space when you're approaching a ledge), works consistently, and doesn't significantly change her power level. 我们有讨论如何让这个操作产生应有的代价，像是在关镜後强制增加0.5秒的恢复时间 这时候不能重新开镜集气或是开枪，但是这类的调整通常效果不是很好，而且会让玩家操 作时产生混乱，所以我们决定不往这个方向调整。 最後，我们不会阻止甚至非常喜欢玩家去挖掘这些小技巧。像是我们一开始根本没有设 计让玩家可以用WM的勾爪来做弹射，但是我们决定把这个操作留在WM上，因为很简单、操 作起来很协调、而且不会显着的影响英雄平衡。 ============================================================================== PS.满多游戏利用这些技巧来提升脚色的深度跟学习曲线。 不过OW的设计师显然有不一样的想法。 大家觉得这个改动如何呢? --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc), 来自: 36.227.232.188 ※ 文章网址: https://webptt.com/cn.aspx?n=bbs/OverWatch/M.1466157417.A.95E.html ※ 编辑: IamAFake (36.227.232.188), 06/17/2016 18:00:31