上篇候选人名单忘了介绍，这次简单介绍一下CSM CSM 全名 The Council of Stellar Management，星际议会，我喜欢称为玩家星际议会 有议长、副议长，议会秘书、副秘书，普通议会成员，目前正在选第七届议员 平常要用Skype开会(似乎是每个月至少一次)讨论跟EVE相关的议题、争论 也有个只限CSM成员与CCP成员才能看到的内部论坛可用 整理记录後交给CCP议会(成员是由执行长从ccp员工中选出来担任) CCP议会就会在冰岛的会议上提出来讨论，可以执行的项目就排进未来修正计划，无法执行 的项目就退回给CSM议会，并解释为何做不到(似乎要) 这篇有很多地方都抓不到意思，只好乱翻一通，所以附上原文对照以供参考，也请大家不 吝指正。很多地方没照原句来翻，因为那样无法让读者理解Hans想说的。 原新闻出处 http://www.evenews24.com/2012/02/29/csm-interview-%E2%80%93-hans-jagerblitzen/ Sindel: What would you like people to know about you? Sindel: 关於你自己，有什麽想对大家说的吗？ Hans: Started playing 2.5 years ago. Came across Eve, downloaded via steam. In 45 minutes, knew I would play until it ends. Grew up on Privateer and Wing Commander, happy to see it as an MMO. As a pilot, been involved in FW since I began. Mostly PVP, but I mine and manufacture as well. Do a lot of booster manufacture in low sec. Empire space has been my home since I began. Had some alts in null, but it never hooked me. I’ve been working the last six months to improve faction warfare. Really trying to connect the different FW groups, to step past the in game disputes and work together to improve FW. Really want to improve FW and other parts of the game. Hans： 开始接触EVE是在两年半以前。偶然发现EVE，透过steam下载回来。只玩仅仅四十 五分钟，就知道除非结束运营，否则我离不开EVE了。自小银河飞将就伴随着我长大，很 高兴能在网路游戏上看到相似的内容。我的太空生涯是从势力战争开始，几乎都在PVP， 少数时候会当个矿工跟制造商，在低安生产过很多增效剂。帝国区一直是我的家，虽曾用 分身体验过0.0，但那一点也不吸引我。为了改善势力战争，我已努力六个月，试着让不 同的势力战争组织放下游戏中的争执，一起为这目标合作。真的很想让势力战争及EVE的 其他部份变得更美好。 Sindel: What do you think as a CSM member you can do to get the Devs listen and what changes would you make? Sindel: 作为一位CSM成员，你认为怎样做才能让开发部听取你的意见？哪些部份是你认 为该修改的呢？ Hans: Work off CSM 6’s method. Skype. Forum channels. Put off controversial stuff. Work with community on things that everyone agrees with. Get the core stuff fixed first. Would like to see the good parts of the existing FW system there: plexing system (gate hull size control). Need to fix the rewards to promote actual fighting. The lasting appeal is the small gang warfare. RP and grudge match and the stuff that may work in null doesn’t promote warfare in FW – a smaller, casual gaming crowd. The existing rewards are for PVE missions that have nothing to do with PVP, and can be farmed in stealth bombers, so the PVP that promotes is stealth bombers being chased by interceptors. The rewards should be lifted from the missions and moved to actual PVP. Like to see that kind of thing tried out. Hans: 透过跟第六届CSM一样的管道，Skype，论坛。远离争议项目、致力於论坛上大家认 可的项目。优先修正核心内容。想要保留目前好的势力战争设定：复合空间加速轨道的船 型限制。势力战争的报酬需要增加。小队战需要持续改进。 在0.0行得通的角色扮演、互相仇视的势力没办法出现在势力战争中，因为人少、且又是 休闲玩家。目前势力战争的PVE任务报酬与PVP无关而且能够用隐轰不断地刷，所以对那些 做势力战争任务的人来说所谓的PVP就是隐轰与拦截舰玩躲猫猫。势力战争任务报酬应该 要透过实际的PVP产生。想要见到诸如此类修改。 Sindel: Does Faction Warfare need a little bit of work or a lot of work? Should it be iterated upon or should CCP scratch it and start over? Sindel: 势力战争只需要一些或是很多修改呢？是否该反覆修改或是让CCP推倒它从头来 过？ Hans: I’m not a programmer. Don’t want to say something is easier to transfer AI around. However, PVE has traditionally been lackluster in Eve. Sleepers were a good start but players mastered that and demanded PVE to be brought to the next level. Incursions really accomplished that. It is engaging PVE content. Missions in high sec… there are reasons they are so easily farmed. I know the potential to fix PVE is there, CCP did it with Incursions, but the PVE content across the board needs to be improved. Even if they left FW PVE content intact, the AI needs to be smarter so it cannot be farmed by stealth bombers. Need to remove the stealth bomber grind. If they even need the PVE content to begin with. Many players think there isn’ t a need to grind rats. Hans: 我不是程式设计师，不想妄加论断某事比修改ai还容易。然而在EVE中，PVE一直是 不起眼的。冬眠者是个好的开始，但玩家很快就摸清如何攻略而想要更高难度的PVE。入 侵办到了，相当引人入胜的PVE内容。至於高安任务如此容易是有理由的。我认为修改PVE 的潜力存在着，CCP已经在入侵证明过了，但全体PVE内容仍需要改进.即使他们不想更动 势力战争PVE内容，也必须让AI更聪明一些，好让隐轰没办法刷爽爽。如果他们真想开始 对势力战争PVE动刀，避免隐轰天天刷是势在必行。很多势力战争玩家认为如果可以透过 刷人获得报酬的话，何必刷NPC海盗。 Sindel: Do you feel that past CSMs represented the entire population. Do you feel like you would represent the entire population. How would you make sure that the needs of as many people as possible felt included in this process? Sindel: 你觉得过去的CSM是否足以代表所有人？你认为你能够代表所有人吗？你如何确 保多数人的需求在此过程能被听见？ Hans: Previous CSMs have been mostly dominated by null bloc candidates. Hans: 之前的CSM绝大多数由0.0联盟候选人把持。 Sindel: Heh. Sorry. Sindel: 阿，真是抱歉。 Hans: Null is an important place and deserves representation I understand the democratic process that leads to null candidates being dominant. I think there needs to be more diverse representation. The changes to CSM make me optimistic that those without a giant bloc backing us will have our voice heard as well. If the players elect mostly null sec candidates, it wouldn’t be game breaking if the elected CSM is willing to reach out to the community of parts of Eve they do not understand. That’s been done somewhat in past CSMs. I want to encourage more of that. Look to the people who know the mechanics best. Hans: 0.0是重要的地方且值得代表，我能理解民主程序让0.0候选人有优势。我认为需要 更多形形色色代表。这改变会让我乐观看待CSM未来将听见更多没有大势力在背後支持的 声音。如果大家选择大部份隶属0.0联盟的候选人，那麽只要这些被选出的代表，能够对 他们不懂的部份在论坛上寻求协助，将不会让游戏变得更糟糕。过去CSM就是这样运作的 。我想要更进一步，寻找那些对最了解游戏机制的玩家帮忙。 Sindel: If you had to sum up your primary goal if elected to CSM, what would it be? Sindel: 可以总结一下在当选後你的主要目标是什麽吗？ Hans: More important than the issues, the really important things that CSM needs to take advantage of is the momentum and the direction of the way CSM can influence CCP. The power of CSM is that it draws on players. The players are a resource that have devoted more man hours gaining experience than even the developers on the mechanics of the game. The most important thing is that CSM should be a balance of interests. The playerbase/CSM/CCP relationship is still in a delicate state. Need to keep the communication channels open. Been involved in communicating with the current CSM, trying to get ideas in. Some came across, some of what I saw in the summit didn’t seem to match up with what the community wanted. Need to improve the process. Hans: 跟那些议题比起来还有更重要的事，CSM需要在影响CCP开发方向及动力方面占到便 宜。CSM的权力来自玩家。玩家是一项资源，比起开发者来，玩家投入了更多的时间在游 戏机制上而拥有更多经验。最重要的是CSM应该担当利益天平的角色。玩家群体、CSM、 CCP三方间的关系仍旧脆弱。需要保持沟通管道畅通。正忙於与这届CSM沟通，让他们了解 这想法。一些我在会议上遇到的代表不够符合论坛的期望。这需要改进。 Sindel: You are right, 2011 wasn’t a good year for CCP. I agree, it is a fragile relationship that CCP has with CSM and the players. A question from a dev – how would you have handled the emergency summit? Do you think that it actually helped? Sindel: 你是对的。对CCP来说2011年不好过。我同意三方的关系是脆弱的。开发部想请 教你：「你会如何处理紧急会议？你认为那有帮助吗？」 Hans: Absolutely. I think there is no question that it helped. I was listening to VoV podcast with Mike. Agree with what he said. CSM is the spike driven into CCP by the hammer of the playerbase. I think the method of the CSM was legitimate tactic. I would have participated in that. That is what CSM is about. It is a bold experiment in customer service. CCP delivers a product to customers. It is a video game. CCP is setting themselves up for success when they allow CSM to work. The summer was a reaction to the CSM not being allowed to do their job. Unfortunate that they did not get more time to work on Crucible. Need to pick up that ball and run with it. Hans: 绝对有。它毫无疑问有帮上忙。我听过有Mike参加的VoV帕播。同意他提到的，玩 家群体代表铁鎚，敲打着CSM这根钉子驱使CCP前进。这就是CSM的作用，合理的用法，而 我想加入其中。CSM是个大胆实验。CCP制作一个电玩游戏给玩家。当他们允许CSM发挥作 用时，就是迈向成功之路。去年夏天的抗议事件就是个例子，CSM没被允许完成他们的工 作。可惜第六届CSM没有足够的时间让Crucible变得更好，需要下一届CSM接棒并继续努力 。 Sindel: Hans and I did shots before we started. I did peanut butter vodka. This interview brought to you by Nutliquor. Sindel: Hnas跟我在访谈开始前喝了一杯。我喝了peanut butter vodka，这次访谈需要 中断一下让我们清醒清醒。 Sindel: We’re back. Any words for the EN24 audience? Sindel: 我们回来了，对EN24读者有什麽想说的吗？ Hans: The more people who vote, the more democratic this becomes. The less voting blocs impact the game. Take the time, educate yourself. This is useless if you don’t vote. Hans: 越多人投票，CSM就会变得越民主。越少人投票，大联盟越能影响这游戏。花些时 间教育自己。若你们不投票，这访谈将毫无意义。 Sindel: This is Sindel and Hans… somewhat sober… signing off! Sindel: 这是Sindel和Hans...有点醉意..采访到此结束！ --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 220.130.245.45 ※ art1:转录至看板 C_Chat 03/02 17:51