我只有看回答部分 以下是一点意见 ※ 引述《s9527206 (悠)》之铭言： : Q：Do you agree with manager Jim Riggleman with the fact that left-hander : Scott Olsen is a lock for the rotation if he's healthy? With all those : other pitchers battling for a rotation spot, don't you think Olsen needs : a good Spring Training to make it? : -- Alex C., Montreal : A：I think Olsen should be given a second chance to be in the rotation. He : has a track record of pitching a lot of innings. I watched him throw : recently and I think he looks real good on the mound. He said his shoulder : is not 100 percent, but I expect him to be by Opening Day. : Q：对於总教练Jim Riggleman确实说过，如果Scott Olsen健康的话，他就可以直接在 : 轮值里占有一席之地，这种说法你同意吗？当其他的投手很努力地奋斗好争取进入 : 轮值的机会，你不认为Olsen必须在春训时有好的表现才有资格得到这个地位吗？ : A：我想我们应该给Olsen第二次的机会，把他留在我们的先发轮值中。他能够替我们 : 吃下大量的局数，而且这一点也有实绩可以证明。我在最近看过他投球，同时我 : 认为他看起来状况相当不错。他表示说他的肩膀尚未100%恢复，不过我期待能够在 : 开幕首日登场时看到他。 but I expect him to be (100 percent) by Opening Day. 我希望他的肩膀能在开幕赛前恢复 : Q：Does it worry you that no one on the Nationals collected more than 100 : strikeouts? The closest one was right-hander Jordan Zimmermann, and he : was out for most of the second half of the season. : -- Ray U., Washington, D.C. : A：I'm not worried about them being ground-ball pitchers as long as the : Nationals play great defense to back them up. I don't think people : realize how bad the defense was last year. I think it will determine : how far they go this year. : Q：你是否会担心国民队的投手没有人能够投超过100个三振这个问题？其中最接近的人 : 是Jordan Zimmermann，不过他却得等到球季後段才能回来。 : A：我还真的是一点都不担心这个问题呢，只要国民队的野手们能够以优秀的防守能力 : 来支援这些滚地球型投手群的话。我不认为人们有意识到去年国民队的防守问题有 : 多麽严重。我想这一点是个关键，这将会决定今年这支球队能够走得多远。 不用翻得这麽字面 = = : Q：Where does outfielder Justin Maxwell fit into the scheme of things? : -- Pam K., Frederick, Md. : Q：Justin Maxwellge(外野手)在球队蓝图里所扮演的角色是什麽呢？ : A：Maxwell must have a great Spring Training to make the team. He is great : defensively and at running the bases.I think he needs to show that last : September, in which he hit .306 with three home runs and six RBIs, : wasn't a fluke. : A：Maxwell他一定得在春训期间有很好的表现才能够加入球队。他有很不错的防守能力 : 以及跑垒速度。 : 我想他必须证明去年他在9月份，打出3成06打击率，还带有3支全垒打及6分打点的 : 表现并不是侥幸得来的。 Q翻对 但A没跟着改对 Maxwell在春训期间想必付出很大的力气去完成球队的蓝图 (照意思翻的 有些字在原文是看不到的) 另外作者这段写得不是很明确 我猜测作者是想表达 "Maxwell已经是个不错的队员，但作者认为Maxwell仍需更进一步的证明去年 九月份的成绩不是昙花一现" 这样的意涵 不过文字上没有足够的迹象就是了 --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.119.191.107 我想你搞错我的意思了 我的意思是那段可以翻译成： (I think it will determine how far they go this year.) 「我想这一点是个关键，这将会决定今年这支球队能够走得多远。」 ↓ 「我认为这将是决定这球队今年能有多少进展的关键。」 这样的差异当然不是谁对谁错 因为事实上你并没翻错 所以我倾向不写出来以免让人觉得我什麽都在挑 但在翻译的过程中 不同语言的用字逻辑应该尽量的能省去或转换以免造成读者混淆 but, in this case, this did not really matter if you had turned it into a Chinese way or not. cuz both two language users use the same rhetoric way giving the "go away" a abstract implication--progressing. ※ 编辑: kimifort 来自: 140.119.191.107 (03/07 13:42) ※ 编辑: kimifort 来自: 140.119.191.107 (03/07 13:43)