作者bluetai (夏日香气--孙艺珍)
看板NTUGIEE_EDA
标题Re: [杂事]my review comment
时间Sun May 29 00:19:47 2005
※ 引述《internal (水)》之铭言：
: 2: LBB and MLBB are little used to estimate the wirelength, and the
: results are much worse than CBB and MCBB. Why the author spent a lot
: of time to compare the results between LBB (LBB) with CBB (MCBB)?
这一段我会这样写~
Since fewer work use LBB and MLBB to estimate the wirelength
and the results obtained by LBB and MLBB are much worse than
those obtained by CBB and MCBB, why do authors use LBB and
MLBB in your experimental results?
--
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 219.86.34.17