作者lonelyHermes (寂寞的使者)
看板NTU-Exam
标题[试题] 98下 古慧雯 经济组织 期末考
时间Sun Jun 27 16:00:52 2010
课程名称︰经济组织
课程性质︰系选修
课程教师︰古慧雯老师
开课学院:社会科学院
开课系所︰经济学系
考试日期(年月日)︰2010.06.18
考试时限(分钟):120分钟
是否需发放奖励金:是 谢谢
(如未明确表示,则不予发放)
试题 :
1(2 points) Hospitals α,β,γand δ look for one intern each. Students a, b, c
and d are interested in an internship. Their preference rankings from top to
bottom for the hospitals are as follows:
a b c d
──────────
α δ α α
β α δ β
γ β β δ
δ γ γ γ
While the preference rankings of the hospitals for students are:
α β γ δ
──────────
c a a d
b b b a
a d c c
d c d b
Consider the matching:(α,b), (β,a), (γ,c), (δ,d). Is it stable? Why?
2.(4 points) A's expected utility function u(w) is increasing and concave in
w, A's wealth. A's future income is uncertain. It will be w
1 and w
2 with
equal chance, and w
2>w
1. How does A evaluate this risky situation? Please
draw a graph with w at the horizontal axis and u at the vertical axis, and
show in the grath the certainty equivalent and the risk premium.
3. Consider two roommates a and b whose utility functions are:
Ua=w
a×c
Ub=w
b+c,
where c is the number of CD's they purchase together and w
i is i's private
spending on other goods than CD's. They have $100 each and the price of a CD
is $2. They have to decide how many CD's to purchase jointly.
(a)(2 points) For this decision, is their any wealth effect for a? And for b?
(b)(1 point)Let ti denote i's payment for CD's, i=a,b. Let t
*i be the opimal
solution to the following problem, i=a,b.
Max t
a,t
b (100-t
a)+(100-t
b)+c
s.t. t
a+t
b=2c, t
a+t
b≧0
Is the result Pareto efficient when i pays t
*i for CD's, i=a,b?
(c)(2 points) Consider another arrangement (t
a,t
b)≠(t
*a,t
*b).
Could such an arrangement be Pareto efficient?
4. An employer considers how to stimulate the employee to work hard.
The employee's expected utility function is:
w^0.5-c(e),
where w is his income and c(e) is the disutility of his effort. When the
employee takes it easy, e=0 and c(0)=0. On the other hand, when the employee
works hard, e=e
h and c(e
h)=2. when e=0, the employer will receive either $10
or $20 with equal chance. When e=e
h, the employer will receive either $20
or $30 with equal chance. The employer will make a payment w to the employee
contigent on how much the employee earns for him. Let w
1, w
2, and w
3 denote
the payment when the employee earns $10 ,$20 and $30. The employerwishes to
design a contract which states how much w
1, w
2 and w
3
will be, to stimulate the employee to work hard at the minium possible
expected payment. If the employee doesn't like the contract, he has no other
working opportunity and when he is jobless, his utility is 0.
(a)(2 points) What's the employer 's objective function?
(b)(2 points) What ia the IC (incentive compatibility) constraint?
(c)(2 points) What is the IR (individual rationality) constraint?
(i.e. the participation constraint)?
(d)(3 points) Please solve for w
1, w
2 and w
3
※
绿色为下标,
红色为上标
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.112.211.177
1F:推 TINTINH :已收:) 06/27 16:30