作者imagics (iiiiiiiii)
看板NTHU_Talk
标题[情报] 教授可选择不公布成绩分布
时间Sat Jun 22 03:29:36 2019
教务处又想出神奇的 idea 了~
-
各位同仁,大家好:
日前新闻媒体刊载:「清华大学学生选课出奇招,有学生透过大数据分析,汇整出过去超过1700堂成绩分布,让学生轻松选到易得高分的「甜甜课……」。
公布成绩分布乃方便学生在成绩系统中查阅自己的单科成绩百分比,作为申请奬学金或研究所的参考。学生以大数据的方式,将成绩分布上网并作为选课参考,从教育的观点来看并不适合;学生选课应以系上的修课规定、学生本身的学习规划及课程内容(大纲)为依据,而非选修易得高分之科目。为避免学生将「单科成绩分布表」作不合宜之运用及误导选课,请各位教师於评分时,确实依照本校「学生成绩作业要点」之附表三评分(如附),让评分更具监别度。
另外,教务处也将调查各授课教师是否同意将修课成绩分布表公开,教务处将尊重每位教师的意愿,采取弹性作法,公布该课程之成绩分布表。意愿调查之事需待计中程式修改完成後方能实施,预计7月1日上线。
教务处谨启 108/6/21
Dear Instructors,
A few days ago, the news media published: “National Tsing Hua University (NTHU) students have developed a “Magic Course Selection APP” which has collected and analyzed grade distributions of more than 1,700 courses offered at NTHU in the past. Students can use this app to choose the so-called “sweet courses” and receive high scores in these courses…”.
The University’s purpose in releasing course grade distributions is to help students check their academic performance range, which can serve as a reference when applying for graduate studies or for scholarship applications. Given the university’s goal of fostering learning, it is inappropriate for students to regard receiving high grades as the sole course-selection purpose. Students are expected to take courses based on university or departmental requirements, their own study plans, and the course
syllabi. In order to prevent students from misusing the “individual course grade distribution,” it is advised that all instructors abide by the grading rubrics (see the attached Regulations) and try to enhance the validity and reliability of grading.
In addition, the Office of Academic Affairs, will investigate whether instructors will agree or disagree to disclose their grade distribution. We will respect your decisions and will adopt a more flexible approach on releasing grade distributions in the future. The above-mentioned survey will start to run after the Computer and Communication Center modifies the relative programs around July 1, 2019.
Sincerely,
The NTHU Office of Academic Affairs
21 June 2019
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc), 来自: 36.239.96.28 (台湾)
※ 文章网址: https://webptt.com/cn.aspx?n=bbs/NTHU_Talk/M.1561145378.A.D3E.html
2F:推 orzkk88: 资讯不对称 06/22 04:40
3F:推 SFV650: 嘘馊主意 06/22 08:54
4F:推 AnnAnnNiHow: = = 06/22 11:38
5F:推 kevin1212: 这是学校解决问题的方法吗= = 06/22 11:51
6F:→ kevin1212: 这样学生权益会受损吧 包含如果之後研究所被问某些科目 06/22 11:53
7F:→ kevin1212: 的成积之类的 你又不能说这个教授很硬 要有数据吧= = 06/22 11:53
8F:推 ya870323: 这会变成Adverse selection吧 06/22 13:29
9F:推 LaAc: 哪一家媒体文章这麽贱啊…… 06/22 13:38
10F:推 breadking: 不过隔壁都没在公布的就是了... 06/22 13:44
11F:嘘 ggpickpocket: 够烂 06/22 14:40
12F:推 loveqn: 掩盖问题 06/22 15:56
13F:推 Hscyin: 不公开的话学生要怎麽证明这门课很硬啦 喜憨制度诶 06/22 17:00
14F:推 jrsh0906: 刚刚问113的朋友,只有知道自己的成绩,连班平均都没有 06/22 17:12
15F:推 LPCbaimlly: 怎麽不问为什麽教授都给这麽高= = 06/22 18:45
16F:推 alan23273850: 台大也没在公布的阿... 06/23 10:49
17F:推 iComic: 至少通识保留吧 有些真的不知道在硬几点 A+不到5% 06/23 12:04
18F:推 alan23273850: 顺带一提,清大还公布修课同学名单,台大也没有,我 06/23 21:40
19F:→ alan23273850: 是觉得公布修课同学这点很母汤就是... 06/23 21:40