作者OscarJeff (艺术与城市)
看板NHCUE-Talk
标题[资讯] 江山艺改所开幕展:活色‧生画‧展
时间Tue Jun 4 14:15:09 2013
江山艺改所开幕展:活色‧生画‧展
Jiang Shan Yi Gai Suo Grand Opening Exhibition: Live Painformance Exhibition
艺术家 Artists/
王若涵 WANG Ruo-Han
《黑白对食 (Dine with Tai Chi philosophy)》
赖怡璋 LAI Yi-Chang
《空气绘画 (Painting in the air)》
涂毓修 TU Yu-Shou
《生活永远在一边抛弃一边继续 (Throwing something and going on, it is the
life.)》
策展人 Curator/
柯裕嘉 KO Yu-Jia
开幕表演 Opening Performance/
2013.06.09 (日) 15:00
展览期间 Date/
2013.06.09 - 07.15
地点 Venue/
江山艺改所 (新竹市江山街17-4号)
Jiang Shang Yi Gai Suo (No.17-4, Jiang Shan St., Hsinchu City)
免费入场 Free Admission
交通方式/
●大众运输
火车站出口出来,沿着左前方林森路直走约100公尺,於左手边「台湾银行」前搭乘大远
百免费接驳车,在第三个停靠站(中山路北门街口)下车,往前直走约50公尺右转仁德街(
地标为贡茶),直走约50公尺左转江山街,找到13号及15号之间的防火巷,进入巷子约15
公尺右手边即为本空间正门。
●步行
火车站出口出来,沿着左前方林森路直走,看到右手边的「南门医院」後右转复兴路并直
走东门街,看到城隍庙前广场往正前方找到仁德街(地标为贡茶),进入仁德街直走约50公
尺左转江山街,找到13号及15号之间的防火巷,进入巷子约15公尺右手边即为本空间正门
。(约15~20分钟)
●地图 Map
中文版:
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=418695844895096&set=a.418695798228434.1
073741838.401184409979573&type=3&theater
English version:
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=420338138064200&set=a.418695798228434.1
073741838.401184409979573&type=3&theater
对我而言,这是一个关於时间的实验。有些时候我们着迷於当下,发生的那个片段,过程
,路上的风景,那时那刻,我们真正活着;有些时候我们则着迷於永恒,把时间延长,堆
叠,保存,风乾後切片展示、蒐藏、贩卖,时间流中,彷佛永生不死。
於是便有了这个展览的概念:「活色‧生画‧展」强调了展演的「活生生」,除了活人、
活物,当下创作的灵光也是活的,这一切只为突显随之而来的,「死寂的展览」这样的形
式。一般而言,当艺术家创作完成,在素雅的空间里挂上作品,无论是一张画、一幕影甚
至一个物件,展览空间也随之成为金字塔,观众往往只能找寻图坦卡门的面具,而不知道
国王的真面目。
不过必须澄清的是,这个关於时间的实验无意将「生」与「死」对立,也无意贬抑「死亡
」(在宗教意涵上,死亡通常意味着再生),更无意让「现场」与「展示」成为矛盾;这麽
说吧,我所尝试的,是串接两者,让创作的结束也是展览的开始,中间没有所谓的「布展
」(闭门不见客)作为缓冲空窗,观众可以一口气看见艺术家创作、呈现/摆放作品成为展
览的连续过程,既体验艺术创作与展演上的历时性,也得以见到创作与展览之间黏合的可
能。
但我知道现实的状况是,也许有人只能来到「活」的现场,也许有人只能看到「死」的展
览,要能让观众串连两者实属难事,不过,也就是这种「没有看完整个展览」的遗憾感,
可以让人对展览未知的另外一半保持好奇,并思考为什麽我们总在「现场」与「展览」二
择一?为什麽艺术展演总在切割时间,让它变得破碎而断裂?
有没有可能,创作既是活体又是古物,而观众既是活体解剖师,也是考古学家?
This is an experiment of time. Some people live in the moment; and some
people are fascinated by the eternity. We cherish, preserve and display every
bit of life, granting it it's immortality.
"Live Painformance Exhibition" emphasizes on the living aspects, including
living people, living things and living moments of creativity, that come
before any mundane exhibitions. When a photograph, a painting or a piece of
art is shown in a gallery, how the piece is done is often left unknown.
This experiment does not oppose nor disparage death. It does nothing but
connects the scene of creation with the scene of exhibition. There is no gap
in between the creation and the display of the art. By bring them together,
the viewers will be able to experience the making of and the display of the
art.
Some people may only be here for the live performance, and some may only be
here for the "lifeless" exhibition. Would we be curious about what the other
half of the experience is like? Why do we have to choose from the
alternatives? Why are performances/ creations and exhibitions always
separated by time?
Is it possible that a piece of creation can be both living and venerable and
that a viewer can be both dissector and archaeologist?
https://www.facebook.com/events/172550866240319/
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.163.53.134
※ 编辑: OscarJeff 来自: 118.163.53.134 (06/04 14:15)