yeah, i agree with the distribution of justice thing.... journalists, as well as the justice department, are all made to serve people, and the set of rules, that sorts of things. and people are bound to fight for resources. it's a mortal thing. i think Clark here actually provoked a further question, which probably will wind up in this inevitable debate: do journalists carry some kind of responsibility that sets out to benefit to the society and its citizens? if they do, then what is it? i think for the time being, the answers to these questions vary through different sets of principles, regarding to diversified viewpoints. as to the ethic problems among the practitioners of journalism in our society, i seek the free will inside every individual rather than the poor imagination lay by the collective wisdoms. that is, what the people want is always prior to what they need. the human history is written by those who hold extraordinary visions, not by those who accommodate life in accordance to their unchanged codes. -- --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 218.167.95.33