※ 引述《watching (cAMP的麻将太差)》之铭言： : ※ 引述《dh0104 (你不在我身边)》之铭言： : : 我没看到这球...不过关键可能再於 Gardner 有没有真正掌握控球权吧? : 如果我没记错的话，Gardner得球之前球已经碰到篮框了 我不太记得有没有碰到篮框，如果有的话，那进攻时间一定要重新算，如果没有， dh0104兄所说的「控球权的掌握」是可能的解释，当时的情况我记得是 Gardner 抢下篮板（这时候没问题），但接下来要移动时脚滑了一下，因此选择运球行进 保持平衡，但球还是掉了，这就要看裁判认不认为 Gardner 算不算已掌握球权， 後来找了一下报导，似乎探讨这球的不多，TSN有一小篇，作者的个人意见认为 是个bad call，附在後面作为参考。 The situation: With 1:30 remaining in the second overtime of his team's second-round game against Gonzaga, Arizona's Jason Gardner grabs a rebound from a missed shot by Bulldogs center Richard Fox. As Gardner loses his balance, in order to avoid a travel he wisely decides to dribble the ball once, twice, three times before it gets away from him. Gonzaga regains possession, apparently presuming it has a fresh shot clock to work at overcoming Arizona's one-point lead. Nope. The shot-clock is lapsing, because the officials either forgot to reset it or ruled Gardner had not gained possession. How one can dribble the ball without possessing seems to be an existential question only a referee can handle. The Bulldogs wound up committing a shot-clock violation and never scored again. Given the circumstances, it's no wonder Zags point guard Blake Stepp didn't check the shot-clock and missed that it was lapsing. Arizona deserved its victory. The Wildcats played 50 minutes to earn it. But both teams deserved competent officiating in such an important game. --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.csie.ntu.edu.tw) ◆ From: 65.96.165.187