作者gswnec (gswnec)
看板MountainClub
标题Re: [社务] 社产组的锅子
时间Sat Nov 23 13:28:14 2013
※ 引述《Gloyia (hello)》之铭言:
: 不好意思,原文太过精简,造成大家误会
: 首先先澄清的是,还装时锅子乾净的标准
: 1.锅子内部要洗乾净,不能有油垢脏污异味
: 这点和以前一样没变
: 2.可以烤锅,但是锅子外部的炭灰要洗乾净,手摸起来不会变黑
: 还装时锅子不用刷回原本的金属光泽
: ====================================================
: 1.用瓦斯烧锅,隔天冷却後行走时受挤压碰撞,锅子的强度就不会变差?
: 营火的温度不见得比较高,这点跟用不用营火烤锅没有关系
: 2.焦油黑炭的附着会造成伤害没错,但是造成多少伤害?
: 焦油的酸性会腐蚀锅子外部,但是铝锅本身的氧化铝不溶於酸硷
: 还有黑炭都可以起到保护作用,最後剩下多少腐蚀性是有疑义的
: 而且是附着在锅子的"外部",平常食物接触到的是锅子"内部"
: 比起在意外部焦油的腐蚀,煮食酸性食物更直接的对人体造成伤害
: 3.因此社产组更改标准,不须将锅子刷回原来的颜色
: 只要还回来时,手摸起来不会变黑就好了
: 建议分公装的时候,将锅子包上几层塑胶袋
: 这样烤完锅子的隔天有塑胶袋装着就不用担心弄脏了
: 分成两组锅子是不错的提议,详细办法设产组再讨论
: 甚至什麽时候可以烧锅,什麽时候不可以烧锅
: 将背锅者心理、行进天数、对伍状况等因素考量进去後
: 希望在出队中将烧不烧锅变成一个弹性的选项
: 而不是绝对的说不能烧就是不能烧,或是在众人的鼓噪之下想烧就烧
: 最後,这次一举将社产组的规定改成可以烧锅或许太躁进了,谢谢指教
这篇文章是针对你的说法回应而非政策本身
This article is written for arguing your assertion, not for your new policy.
首先,我想强调的并非温度高低,而是烤锅子与挤压的配合。之所以挤压会减少强度
与使用年限是因为挤压会让锅子的内部裂缝接处到外部环境。如果我们只使用瓦斯火来加
热,情况就会如同你所说的,这些裂痕会被氧化铝所覆盖而保护内部金属。然而,若是在
营火上烧烤,这些裂痕将会附着来自於柴火的杂质。
First of all, what I want to emphasize is not the temperature, but the
matching of burning and squeezing. Why squeezing will decrease the strength
and life of pots is that that squeezing will expose the inside cracks to
outside environment. If we only use gas-fire to temper the pot, as what you
said, cracks would be cover by Aluminium Oxide and protect the inside metal.
However, if you burn it over the bonfire, those cracks will attach lots of
impurities from the various composition of wood.
第二,你声称氧化铝可以防止焦油的腐蚀。这种材质的确是既坚硬又有抗腐蚀性,但
你并未考虑氧化铝坚硬的性质正代表着他的延展性相当差。也就是说,任何形变都会造成
氧化铝表面层的破碎,而使腐蚀发生。
Second, you contend that the Aluminium Oxide can prevent the pot from the
corrosion of scorched oil. It’s true that this material is rigid and
anticorrosion, but you fail to consider that high hardness of Aluminium Oxide
means its ductility is pretty poor. That being said, any deformation must
break the thin Aluminium Oxide coating into small pieces and the corrosion
take place.
第三,你说数层塑胶袋的使用可以解决弄脏背包的问题。尽管这样的说法并没错,但
种行为同时也产生其他的问题。环境友善问题是其一。我们都知道塑胶袋不容易被环境所
分解。此外,便利性问题也是其一,尤其是在有更多烤锅机会的长天数队伍中。
Third, you state that using several layers of plastic packs is able to
solve the problem of staining the backpack. Although there is some truth in
this claim, this behavior might also cause some problems. A controversial one
is eco-friendly problem. We all know plastic packs are not easy to be decomposed
by nature. Besides, this action cause problem of convenience as well,
especially in long-day trips which have more chances to burn the pot in the
bonfire.
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 218.161.15.245
1F:推 terry4901:这....是英语学习网吗? 隔壁 小弱C 11/23 15:46
2F:推 Sgenius:WOW 11/23 22:12
3F:推 findingtl:不愧是念过材料的人阿~~~~~ 11/24 20:39