作者cassine (Savannah)
看板Modchip
标题[PS3 ] 都是they的错，不干I的事，you自己要注意
时间Thu Apr 28 00:22:18 2011
http://www.mcvuk.com/news/44101/PSN-data-liability-disagreement
Sony's T&C's deny responsibility, but ICO suggests otherwise; ￡500k
fine possible
SONY的使用者条款约定中订有「免责条款」，但资讯专员办公室指SONY仍可能面
临50万镑的罚款
It has emerged that part of Sony's PSN terms and conditions claim that
the company is not liable for any loss of user data.
SONY在使用者条款中有特别声明该公司对於任何使用者的资料流失不负任何责任
以下为条款相关文字节录：
"We exclude all liability for loss of data or unauthorised access to
your data, Sony Online Network account or Sony Online Network wallet
and for damage caused to your software or hardware as a result of
using or accessing Sony Online Network," the terms state.
『倘若有任何未经授权的人或团体存取您的资料或您的线上电子钱包导致您在使
用 PSN服务时有任何硬体或软体上的损失，本公司概．不．负．责』。（哇咧）
However, speaking to Edge, the Information Commissioners Office (ICO)
claims that Sony is accountable to stipulations outlined in the UK
Data Protection Act which says that companies are obligated to keep
users' details secure.
然而， ICO官员表示，根据英国资料保护法，SONY有义务妥善保管使用者的资料
。
"While we are unable to say where the data is being stored at present,
if it was in the UK, this clause would not free them from their
obligations under the UK Data Protection Act," ICO stated.
"If we found a breach, one of the actions we could take would be to
issue an undertaking, which is an agreement between the ICO and the
company that if they are handling personal information they have to
bring about set improvements in order for them to be compliant with
the act.
「虽然我们无法确认资料是否还留在主机上，但在英国，这种可能性并不能免除
SONY在英国资料保护法中所规定的义务」， ICO官员如是说。「倘若我们发现该
公司违反相关规定，则我们可以要求他们承诺采取必要措施以符合法律的规定。
而该承诺将会是SONY与 ICO的协议。」
"If the company is not compliant with the act within a certain time
limit, further action would be taken and we might consider an
enforcement notice or issue a monetary penalty.
"For serious breaches of the act, we can issue a monetary penalty up
to ￡500,000."
「又若该公司无法在承诺期限内改善符合规定的状况，则 ICO方面可以动用公权
力强制介入，或是科以罚金。对於严重违法的状况，最高可以罚款50万镑。」
******
唉……换做是我们这边还要用个资法去告， NCC那堆官员才不管这种事咧
--
○ ____ _ _ _ _ ____ _ _ ____ _____ ____
。 ★(_ _)( \( )( \/ )( ___)( \( )(_ _)( _ )( _ \
ｏ _)(_ ) ( \ / )__) ) ( )( )(_)( ) / ● ‧
(____)(_)\_) \/ (____)(_)\_) (__) (_____)(_)\_) ★
ｏ
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 122.117.54.160
1F：推 ouyang:台湾也是类似处理方式吧 122.116.66.45 04/28 00:31
2F：→ ouyang:这种单方 显然对一方不公平的定型化约定 122.116.66.45 04/28 00:32
3F：→ ouyang:基本上是无效约定 122.116.66.45 04/28 00:32
4F：推 j778012:可以用消保法主张该条款无效 218.167.3.165 04/28 00:51
5F：推 FantasyNova:这种单放面定型化契约都是订爽的啦 118.165.167.34 04/28 01:48
6F：→ FantasyNova:如果是可归咎的，不能完全免责 118.165.167.34 04/28 01:48
7F：推 tsming:索尼罪大恶极，从合约就想阴消费者XD 218.164.152.3 04/29 10:15