※ 引述《NKN (99%是眼镜与吐槽)》之铭言： : 关於其他国家提供的坦克。 : 美国M1艾布拉姆斯主战坦克的燃气涡轮发动机实际上可以轻松拆卸。它用10个螺栓固定， : 训练有素的工作人员可以在不到20分钟的时间内完成，但它确实需要一辆救援车。 : 去年12月，美国前国家安全顾问Jake Sullivan承认，美国提供的M1坦克对乌克兰来说「 : 不是最有用的装备」。乌克兰媒体报道称，与豹式坦克一样，维护这些坦克的後勤工作已 : 成为「过重的负担」。 : 美国退役陆军将军Mark Hertling去年6月告诉美国有线电视新闻网 (CNN)，M1坦克是一项 : 技术奇蹟，但维护需求庞大。 : 「这些坦克非常出色，但需要复杂的供应链才能维持其运作。燃料消耗巨大，而且需要专 : 门的维护，这可能会给乌克兰现有的能力带来压力，」他说。 : 据报导，美国和澳洲向乌克兰提供的约80辆艾布拉姆斯坦克中，约有20辆被摧毁、残废 : 或被俘获。 我以前就分享过美军海陆装甲兵的留言了 https://webptt.com/cn.aspx?n=bbs/Military/M.1674188242.A.341.html https://qr.ae/prFpUh 留言就有提到M1A1後勤压力有多大， 也能知道为何当年五角大厦不想军援艾布兰给乌克兰 (後来是拜登命令才给) 这边就附上Google翻译和原文： 当我看到在「末日後电影」中使用军用飞机、坦克或复杂设备时， 我第一个抱怨的是，他们从哪里得到零件？ 一般规则是M1A1每运作一小时就需要 8 小时的维护。 这是“工时”，因此四名工作人员分摊 2:1 的维护和操作。 大部分维护本质上是预防性的； 检查和更换油和液体、履带张力和调整、验证光学器件是否仍然正常运作等。 许多预防性维护实际上是检查磨损或故障但尚未导致系统故障的零件； 然後替换它们。 就算没有任何零件，大多数坦克也能运行几天， 前提是你拥有维持坦克运作所需的油和燃料。 如果你幸运的话，可能需要一到两周。 在某些时候，系统将开始出现故障。 艾布拉姆斯拥有备用机械火控系统， 即使某些系统出现故障，坦克仍可以继续运行， 但迟早你需要撕掉封条并换上新的部件。 还好坦克可以携带很多备用零件， 而更高层级的维修部队会携带更大、更昂贵的零件。 美国海军陆战队和其他军种拥有极其复杂的物流供应链， 遍布全球，将零件从工厂、商店和供应中心 不断运送到正在训练和部署到战区的军事单位 （显然，优先考虑部署到战区的部队）。 这些系统最近都已数位化，但即便如此，即使它们运作良好， 出现供应链故障和「零件短缺」也是相当正常的。 M1A1 是一种极为复杂的机械。 如果您在炮塔转动时将头探入炮塔内部， 您会看到它所搭载的液压、电子、光学和武器系统如同蜘蛛网般极其复杂。 所有这些东西都有可能因为各种原因而发生故障。 最後要提到的是，如果您的工作人员具有机械天赋， 并且该区域还有其他无法运作的坦克， 则可以从其他坦克上获取大部分零件以使您的坦克正常工作。 但这不是一个好的做法，因为这意味着您没有有效且可持续的物流供应链。 This is my number one complaint when I see movies that are using military aircraft, tanks or complicated equipment in a‘post-apocalyptic’ environment. Where are they getting their parts?? The general rule is that for one hour of operations an M1A1 will need 8 hours of maintenance. This is ‘man-hours’, so a crew of four will need to conduct 2:1 maintenance to operation. Much of this maintenance is preventative in nature; checking and changing oils and fluids, track-tension and adjustment, verifying optics are still functioning properly, etc. A lot of preventative maintenance is actually checking for parts that are wearing out or failing, but haven’t caused a system to fail yet; and then replacing them. So without any parts, most tanks could probably operate for a few days, assuming you had the necessary oils and fuels to keep the tank running. Maybe a week or two if you are lucky. At some point systems will start to fail. The Abrams have back-up mechanical fire control systems, and the tank can continue to run with certain failed systems, but sooner or later, you are gonna need to pull off the duct tape and throw in a new part. But tanks carry lots of spare parts on board, and higher echelon maintenance units will carry larger and more expensive parts. The US Marine Corps and other branches have extremely complex logistic supply chains that stretch all around the world and move parts continuously from factories, stores, and supply hubs to military units that are training and deployed to combat zones (with preference going to units that are deployed to combat areas… obviously). These systems were recently digitized, but even so it is fairly normal to have supply chain failures and be “short parts” even when they are working well. The M1A1 is a massively complex piece of machinery. If you ever poke your head down the turret and look inside as the turret turns, you can see all the incredibly complex spider webs of hydraulics, electronics, optics, and weaponry that it hosts. All of these things have parts that can fail for all sorts of reasons. The last thing to mention is that if your crew is mechanically inclined and there are other non-functioning tanks in the area, most parts can be harvested from another tanks to make your tank work. This is not a good practice, though, as it means you do not have an effective and sustainable logistics supply chain. --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc), 来自: 114.26.92.48 (台湾) ※ 文章网址: https://webptt.com/cn.aspx?n=bbs/Military/M.1746961482.A.196.html 算好了... 想想使用自动填装机采三人编制的装甲兵 https://i.imgur.com/vvJLOsF.jpeg ※ 编辑: sfsm (114.26.92.48 台湾), 05/11/2025 20:50:12