其实嘛…Jobli一直在吵的是他坚持一定要当 场试射之後才能效力射，问题是实际上是这 样吗？ 这里我们在讨论的是反登陆条件下的阵地战 ，所以请先不要乱入不相关的情况。什麽打 新庄会偏到板桥去，拜托不要乱入。 那到底能不能？前面有人说了，二战时的日 军就做得到啊！靠着阵地把美军打得措手不 及。你说那是榴炮，迫炮不行？那我们来看 美军准则好吗？美军有说效力射之前一定要 试射吗？ 没有。事实上，美军的准则很明确地把不试 射直接效力射当作一种奇袭手段，因为会让 对方来不及躲避。海陆的准则是这样写的（ 陆军的也差不多，我就不重复了）： “2-128. Firing corrections within the transfer limits should be maintained through registration, survey data, and current MET message. When those data are unavailable or inadequate, targets should be attacked with observed fire, since unobserved fires may be ineffective. Surveillance should be obtained on all missions to determine the results of the FFE. If accurate, firing for effect without adjustment is highly effective against troops and mobile equipment because damage is inflicted before the target can take evasive action. All destruction missions and missions fired at moving targets must be observed, and FFE should be adjusted on the target.” 简单地说，美国准则只有说实施效力射应有 前观观测确定落点和效果，并且供之後调整 ，但并没有说必须要先试射，反而是说，如 果可以准确地直接进行效力射，对於敌部队 和机动装备的打击效果很高。 然後，准则也很明确的提到一些限制。弹药 消耗就不用说了，准则说供应量高时才能用 ，但这对台湾不是问题，毕竟是在自己主场 。准则这样写： “2-131. The amount of ammunition available is an important consideration when attacking targets. The controlled supply rate (CSR) should not be exceeded except by the authority of higher headquarters. When the CSR is low, units should fire only those missions that contribute the most to the supported units' mission. When the CSR is high, units may fire missions that include targets that affect planning or future operations and targets that require massing fires without adjustment.” 然後，还有一些零星的限制和注意事项就 请自己Google，反正那些对於以阵地战进 行反登陆的一方而言不是太大的问题。 所以，不是我乱讲，是你们因为某些原因 根本不知道可以这样。 ----- Sent from JPTT on my iPhone --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc), 来自: 113.40.10.105 (日本) ※ 文章网址: https://webptt.com/cn.aspx?n=bbs/Military/M.1720852241.A.0DC.html