Mavs' Chandler's surprise case for Most Improved By John Schuhmann, NBA.com Posted Mar 24 2011 12:16PM http://ppt.cc/jEUN Voting for the Most Improved Player award is usually wide open. There are always a lot of players who have better seasons than their previous year, and it's up to the voters to determine which one improved to the greatest degree. Last year, 30 different players, including 14-year veteran Ben Wallace, received first-, second- or third-place votes for the award, evidence that among the voters, there are a lot of different criteria. 最佳进步奖的人选通常有很开放的可能性，总是有很多球员的表现会较去年进步，而票 选会决定谁是进步最多的人。去年，包括已经在联盟第14个球季的Ben Wallace等共有30 个球员被列入考虑，而投票者们考量着不同的标准。 Most improved points per game Player 2009-10 2010-11 Diff. Dorell Wright 7.1 16.4 +9.3 Nick Young 8.6 17.7 +9.1 DeMar DeRozan 8.6 16.6 +8.0 D.J. Augustin 6.4 14.3 +8.0 Wesley Matthews 9.4 16.2 +6.8 Sasha Vujacic 2.8 9.1 +6.4 Kevin Love 14.0 20.3 +6.3 Russell Westbrook 16.1 22.2 +6.1 Jodie Meeks 4.7 10.5 +5.8 Daniel Gibson 6.3 12.1 +5.8 (跳过一小段好像不重要的...) Brooks' scoring average increased by 8.4 points per game last season. This year, when it comes to putting points on the board, no one has been more improved than the Warriors' Dorell Wright. 去年Brooks每场平均得分进步了8.4分，而今年进步最多的是勇士队的Dorell Wright。 Of course, there's more to the game than scoring. And when we look at the efficiency stat, which adds up all positive numbers and subtracts the negative, only four of the players above remain in the top 10. 当然比赛并不只有得分，如果观察下面效率的统计就会发现只剩下四个球员留在前十。 Most improved efficiency per game Player 2009-10 2010-11 Diff. Kevin Love 19.7 28.7 +9.0 D.J. Augustin 6.0 14.7 +8.7 Kris Humphries 9.0 17.1 +8.0 Dorell Wright 8.8 16.8 +8.0 Marcin Gortat 6.9 14.8 +7.9 Tyson Chandler 10.3 17.5 +7.2 Nick Young 5.6 12.4 +6.7 JaVale McGee 8.6 15.2 +6.6 Jrue Holiday 9.4 16.0 +6.6 Brandon Bass 6.4 12.7 +6.3 -Minumum 50 games played this season -Efficiency = Pts. + reb. + ast. + stl. + blk. TO (FGA-FGA) (FTA-FTM) Love obviously has had a huge season statistically, but there is a pace factor to his numbers. The Timberwolves lead the league in pace, averaging 99.5 possessions per 48 minutes. Last year, they ranked third (98.5), so his "improvement" is only slightly aided by pace. 很明显的Kevin Love本季有着漂亮的数据，但部分原因可能是由於球队的节奏快速， 灰狼队本季平均每场的实质进攻次数高达99.5次，领先全联盟。去年他们以平均98.5次 排名第三，所以Love的进步可能受到球队快速球风的些微帮助。 Still, when you adjust for pace, Love moves down a spot in the improvement rankings. The top 10 is the same group of players, but we see that the raw improvement of Love, Wright, Young and McGee has been given a boost by the pace at which their teams play. Most improved efficiency per game, pace adjusted Player 2009-10 2010-11 Diff. D.J. Augustin 6.2 14.9 +8.7 Kevin Love 18.9 27.4 +8.5 Kris Humphries 9.2 17.5 +8.3 Marcin Gortat 6.9 14.9 +8.0 Tyson Chandler 10.6 17.8 +7.2 Dorell Wright 9.2 16.2 +7.0 Jrue Holiday 9.6 16.1 +6.5 Brandon Bass 6.4 12.9 +6.4 Nick Young 5.7 12.1 +6.4 JaVale McGee 8.8 15.0 +6.2 -Minumum 50 games and 1,000 minutes played this season 根据球队的节奏经过调整後，Love、Wright、Nick Young、McGee的效率有些下降。 Now, Augustin's improvement is a lot about opportunity. With Raymond Felton leaving Charlotte via free agency, Augustin is averaging almost twice as many minutes this season (33.4) as he did last season (18.4). But he's still become a better player. If we look at efficiency improvement on a per-minute basis, Augustin is still in the top 10, with Chandler and Humphries also remaining on the list. D.J. Augustin的进步跟上场机会的增加有关，由於Raymond Felton离开了山猫，使得 Augustin的上场时间(33.4)几乎是上一季(18.4)的二倍，虽然如此，他也已经有了相当的 进步，如果将数据修正为平均每分钟的效率，Augustin仍然在前十的位置，而Chandler和 Humphries也依然留在名单上。 Most improved efficiency per 40 minutes, pace adjusted Player 2009-10 2010-11 Diff. Tyson Chandler 18.6 25.5 +6.9 DeShawn Stevenson 6.7 12.1 +5.4 Thaddeus Young 16.2 21.3 +5.1 Darrell Arthur 15.4 20.2 +4.8 Ramon Sessions 15.7 20.4 +4.7 Kevin Martin 17.4 22.1 +4.7 Russell Westbrook 20.7 25.4 +4.6 Vladimir Radmanovic 12.4 16.9 +4.5 Kris Humphries 20.8 25.3 +4.5 D.J. Augustin 13.4 17.9 +4.5 -Minumum 50 games and 1,000 minutes played this season This list better represents the players who have improved their games, and whose jump in numbers isn't just about increased minutes. Kevin Love ranks 12th by this criteria at +4.1, while MVP candidate Derrick Rose ranks 11th at +4.4. 这项数据较清楚地说明了球员在场上效率的进步幅度，并不仅仅是因为他们的上场时间变 多了而使的数据上升。Kevin Love在这项数据中排名第十二，而MVP候选人Derrick Rose 排名第11。 Individual stats are nice and all. But they don't mean much unless they're helping win games. Augustin, Love, Humphries and Wright all play for teams at least 12 games under .500. Coming off the bench, Augustin was a plus-10 for the Bobcats last season (+0.2 per 100 possessions), and he's a minus-230 this year (-5.1 per 100 possessions). 个人的数据确实重要，但这并不表示他可以让球队赢球。 Augustin、Love、Humphries和Wright.....这边看不懂#$%^&*&%# Orz It would be tough to give an award to Augustin when the scoreboard has been going in the wrong direction when he's in the game. The Bobcats have been a better team with Augustin on the bench than with him on the floor. And if you consider team success when determining All-Stars and MVP candidates, surely it has to play a role in Most Improved Player voting. The easiest way to determine team success is to look at the standings. But when evaluating individual players, how well their team performs when they're on the floor must be considered. And when we look at improvement in on-court team stats, we get a much different list. 山猫队在Augustin坐在板凳上的时候表现的还比较好，因此既然D.J.Augustin不能帮助球 队赢球，他实在很难得到这个奖项。如果人们将球队战绩列为考量明星赛球员和MVP的因 素时，同样的这项因素也影响着最佳进步奖的票选。 决定球队是否成功最简单的方是就是看战绩，但是要评价一个球员对球队有无贡献时 就要观察当他在场上时球队的表现如何？ Most improved team efficiency differential (with player on floor) Player 2009-10 2010-11 Diff. Vladimir Radmanovic -8.0 +3.5 +11.4 Chris Bosh +0.3 +10.8 +10.5 Sam Young -9.2 +1.1 +10.3 Tyson Chandler -1.2 +8.8 +10.0 James Jones -0.8 +8.2 +9.0 Taj Gibson -0.4 +8.4 +8.8 Hedo Turkoglu -0.5 +8.1 +8.7 Courtney Lee -5.1 +3.4 +8.5 Derrick Rose -3.4 +5.1 +8.5 Jrue Holiday -2.9 +5.5 +8.4 -Minumum 1,000 minutes played this season and 500 last season -Efficiency differential = Own teams points per 100 possessions - Opponents points per 100 possessions Humphries ranks 67th by this criteria at +3.1, while Love ranks 86th at +1.9. While they both play for bad teams, their improvement has helped their squads get a little bit better. Humphries 在这项数据上仅以+3.1排名第67，而Love以+1.9排名第86，他们的球队战绩 都不理想，他们的进步对於球队战绩可能有一些些的帮助。 It takes more than individual improvement to make it to the top of this list though. Good teammates help. Ranking second in the league in usage rate, Rose obviously has more of an impact in his team's success than the other nine, but Chandler has also clearly made a difference in Dallas. And Chandler is the only guy on each of the last three lists. His per-game numbers have improved dramatically, his per-minute numbers have made a jump, and he's contributing more to his team's success than he did last season. 要在这项数据上名列前茅需要的不仅仅是个人的进步，好的队友也有加分的效果。 在联盟中usage rate排名第二的Rose无疑地对球队有着比名单中其他九人更大的影响力 但Chandler在这方面也不惶多让。 Chandler是唯一一个在前面三项评比都有上榜的人，他的平均单场数据有着显着的成长， 平均每分钟的贡献增加了，也较前一季更能帮助球队赢球。 Chandler's 2009-10 season in Charlotte was a drop-off from his best seasons with the Hornets. His efficiency per 40 minutes is a career best this season, but his efficiency per game was better in 2006-07 and 2007-08. So again, it's up to the voters to determine if his increased numbers are truly about "improvement" or if he's just returning to form after two injury-riddled seasons. It's probably a little of both. 09-10的赛季，在黄蜂队有着优异表现的Chandler於转到山猫队後成绩急速下降。而他平 均每40分钟的效率在本季回到生涯新高。因此，Chandler本季数据的成长是因为真正有了 显着的进步抑或只是从前两个充满伤病的赛季回到以前的水准而已，投票者们会有自己的 定论。 If you're looking at raw stats to determine the league's Most Improved Player, it's hard to look past Kevin Love. But if you look deeper into the numbers, you have to consider guys like Chandler, Holiday and even Rose, who in making the leap from All-Star to MVP candidate, has taken his team with him. 如果仅看个人的数据来决定最佳进步奖的得主，那我们很难忽略Kevin Love；但如果观察 的更深入一点，Chandler、Holiday甚至本季表现抢眼的MVP候选人Rose都是应该考虑的 人选。 ---- 刚刚看到NBA的facebook有发布就顺手翻了一下，是一些数据的分析 第一次翻译有点障碍，如有什麽问题请帮忙修正> <谢谢！ --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.119.129.85 ※ 编辑: shadowyen 来自: 140.119.129.85 (03/25 13:57) ※ 编辑: shadowyen 来自: 140.119.129.59 (03/25 20:53) ※ 编辑: shadowyen 来自: 140.119.129.59 (03/25 21:16)