自翻...如有不顺畅之处还请见谅 建议以网页板搭配图片研究@@ http://webptt.com/cn.aspx?n=bbs/ManUtd/M.1384467496.A.824.html Manchester United 1-0 Arsenal: United start positively then defend extremely narrow 双方先发站位图 http://imgur.com/obnz7Zx David Moyes recorded the first major victory of his tenure at Old Trafford.Moyes selected Phil Jones in the centre of midfield alongside Michael Carrick, and continued with Shinji Kagawa on the left. Arsene Wenger was without Per Mertesacker and Tomas Rosicky due to flu, so Thomas Vermaelen came into the side and Aaron Ramsey moved right. This was a very narrow United victory, in a match where neither side played at their best. David Moyes在Old Trafford拿下了在他任内第一个重大的胜利。Moyes选择在 中场放上Jones来搭配Carrick, 然後在左侧放上Kagawa。 因为Mertesacker和Rosicky的感冒缺阵，所以Wenger选择Vermaelen来打中卫 并且把Ramsey移到了右侧。 这是曼联的一场险胜，因为两边都打出了极佳的状态。 Both sides play cautiously 比赛双方都打得非常小心 The word ‘cagey’ is generally used to describe matches that are slow to get going, but this was an interesting contest because it was simultaneously rather defensive, yet also played at a high tempo. With just one shot in the first half hour, neither side were attacking particularly dangerously, but this was partly because both sides were set up more defensively than usual. 这场比赛双方都打的很小心谨慎，但这并不表示比赛枯燥乏味，反之，双方都打 出了高节奏的进攻以及防守。在前半小时只有一次射门的情况下，每次双方的进攻总 显的异常的危险，但这有一部分原因是在於两边都打的比平常更为防守。 The use of Jones in the centre of midfield gave United tenacity and fight, but also a midfielder who positioned himself more intelligently than Tom Cleverley or Marouane Fellaini might have – he cut off Arsenal’s passing angles and protected the back four, demonstrating that he’s not all about running and tackling. Jones is certainly a versatile player and yet to find a regular role in the side, but his positioning has improved over the last year or so, whether playing at centre-back or in the centre of midfield. 把Jones放在中场不只是增加了曼联的韧性和拼抢能力，加上Jones本场对於在中 场的位置感更优於Cleverley和Fellaini--他直接切断了枪手的传球角度并且保护了 後防四人，展示了他不是只会无尽的奔跑和抄截。Jones是个多面相的球员，而且他 在曼联并没有一个主要的固定位置，但是他的位置感从去年以来就在逐渐进步，不管 是在打中卫或是打中场时都有。 Arsenal, meanwhile, were also more defensive than Wenger would have liked – he indicated he wouldn’t have played two deep midifelders had Rosicky been available, and the Flamini-Arteta axis provided a good screen in front of Arsenal’s (now) relatively unfamiliar centre-back partnership. Wayne Rooney and Robin van Persie rarely combined in open play, and the lack of invention from United’s central midfield zone meant Arsenal were rarely penetrated when they had men behind the ball. 同时，阿森那打的比Wenger想像中的还偏防守一些；Wenger指出他并不会在 Rosicky可以上场的时候摆上两个站位较深的中场球员。Flamini-Arteta这一对组合 为枪手此次较不熟悉的中卫组合提供了良好的视野。Rooney和van Persie本次较少出 现开放式的进攻，而且加上曼联的中场区域缺乏创造性，导致枪手很少有机会可以传出 身後的直塞球。 United dominate opening 曼联支配了开场 But the defensiveness was expected considering the line-ups. What was more surprising, however, was that United started the game dominating possession, with 67% in the opening ten minutes. Although they did relatively little with the possession (in terms of getting it into the final third and creating chances) it was an impressive start considering many expected Arsenal’s band of passing midfielders to retain the ball from the outset and put United under continual pressure. 这种防守从先发的阵容中可以预测到。而更令人惊讶的是，曼联在开场十分钟的持球 率是67%。相对於其他方面，尽管曼联并没有把全部精力都拿来控球，而是让球员进入前 场三分之一的区域去创造机会，这依然是一个让人印象深刻的开场，尤其是在许多人预期 阿森那的中场们从一开始就会掌握球权的这种不被看好的情况下。 http://imgur.com/dX0Zvjs 前十分钟双方传球路线示意图 Maybe Arsenal were surprised at United’s dominance, because they seemed completely unable to work the ball forward when possession was won. Having expected to control the game in United’s half, they didn’t appear to have a cohesive plan at transitions, and rarely exploited the space United left at the back. 也许是阿森那对於曼联前十分钟的表现感到意外，因为当获得球权时枪手们看起来似 乎没办法正常的把球往前传。相较於预期中要把比赛控制在曼联的半场，枪手们在传导时 没有展现出凝聚力，在曼联左路後方的空间也没有善加利用。 United narrow without possession 曼联在没有控球权的情形下压缩防守 Without the ball, United used a tactic Moyes often favoured against Arsenal as Everton boss (and also an approach he used against a wingerless Tottenham last season) – which was to defend extremely narrow, with the full-backs remaining close to the centre-backs, and the wide players tucking inside into the middle. 在无持球的情况下，曼联使用了当Moyes还在Everton当教练时就对阿森那使用的战 术--在防守时阵型较窄，也就是让边後卫站位接近对手中卫(向场中靠拢而不是固定在边 路，感谢classskipper大指正)，然後将其他球员放到中前场围出来的区域。 Clearly, Moyes was concerned about Arsenal’s midfield dominance, and although it took a while for Arsenal to start playing, the away side did eventually dominate possession with both Ramsey and Santi Cazorla darting inside to overload the centre. United’s narrowness, along with Carrick and Jones’ deepness, prevented Arsenal playing intricate passes through the middle, and with Olivier Giroud’s lack of pace and no direct runs from wide, it was difficult to see how Arsenal were going to penetrate the United defence. 很明显的，Moyes对於阿森那的有统治力中场较为担心，尽管阿森那花了一点时间 才进入比赛，但还是得到了控球权，并且有着Ramsey和Cazorla积极前插制造威胁。曼联 的压迫程度跟Carrick和Jones的站位深度极为相关，他们阻止了阿森那往中场送出直塞球 的可能，加上Giroud不快的速度而且他也没有往较宽的区域跑位，这些原因都让阿森那很 难穿透曼联的防守。 Also deserving of a mention is Rooney, who has been very inconsistent with his defensive work over the past couple of years, but essentially became a fifth midfielder at times here. With Rooney deep, plus Kagawa and Antonio Valencia moving inside, United weren’t overrun in the middle. Interestingly, Rooney was generally picking up Mikel Arteta rather than Mathieu Flamini – the Frenchman played higher up the pitch, as if Wenger wanted a combative player to take the fight to United. 再加上Rooney, 他在过去的几年的经验让他在防守时出现在很多区域，就像是变成第 五个中场球员一样。有着Rooney的纵深覆盖，加上Kagawa和Valencia一直前插到禁区内， 曼联在中场并不会人满为患。有趣的是，Rooney比较常选择盯住Arteta，而不是Flamini。 法国人在场上的位置较於Arteta靠前，Wenger似乎是希望他作为一个肉博型的球员来跟曼 联球员拼抢。 The only goal came from a set-piece: Van Persie’s near post header, from the zone Mertesacker would probably have been defending, judging by Arsenal’s format when defending corners against Liverpool. 本场唯一的进球--来自於van Persie，这是一个经过设计的进攻角球。从阿森那对上 利物浦的比赛中可以得知这区域通常为Mertesacker防守。 United reorganisation and Arsenal spread play wider 曼联的重新组织和阿森那的拉开宽度进攻 Two key things happened at the start of the second half. First, Nemanja Vidic went off injured and was replaced by Cleverley, with Jones dropping into centre-back. This caused United problems: Cleverley lacked Jones’ positional sense – almost immediately conceding a free-kick for tripping Giroud, for example – and while Jones is a decent centre-back, he doesn’t have Vidic’s aerial power. 两个关键的因素使於下半场的开场：Vidic的受伤下场而使得Jones後退打中卫然後放 上Cleverley打中场。这对曼联造成了一个问题，Cleverley的位置感比Jones更差，差点 因为一个自由球而对Giroud犯规导致进球，而且虽然Jones是个不错的中卫，但他不像 Vidic有着空霸的能力。 That proved to be particularly crucial because Arsenal realised they needed to exploit the wide open spaces on the flanks, and played a higher proportion of their passes down the wings. Ramsey played as more of a conventional right-sided midfielder in the opening stages of the second half, although Wenger changed to more of a 4-1-4-1 / 4-3-3 by removing Flamini and introducing Wilshere. Now, Arteta, Ramsey and Wilshere played as the midfield trio while Ozil went wide-right. 那两个因素如此重要是因为阿森那了解到他们必须从两侧利用宽度来拉开空间，然後 尽量将球传到边翼。虽然Wenger把队形改为较像是4-1-4-1/4-3-3，并用Wilshere取代 Flamini，Ramsey在下半场的一开始的位置却更像是传统的右中场。至此，Arteta和Ramsey 和Wilshere打三中场并且让Ozeil往右移动拉开距离。 And while Arsenal didn’t equalise, Wenger deserves credit for the switch – Arsenal quickly showed signs of penetrating the United defence. Wilshere provided a good forward burst to get in behind, and then Ozil’s angled run from the right should have resulted in a fine chance – he seemed to pull out at the last moment. 当阿森那还没追平时，Wenger的换人是值得赞赏的--枪手很快就找到了穿透曼联防守 的机会。Wilshere很好的提供了向前冲刺的力量，然後Ozeil从右路插向禁区应该是要得到 一个很好的机会的。 Sagna dominates Sagna的完美表现 With Arsenal dominating possession and United remaining extremely narrow, the key feature of the final 20 minutes was Bacary Sagna getting space down the right flank, and repeatedly hitting some fantastic balls into the box. His crossing created two chances, but two of his ‘unsuccessful’ balls were actually even better deliveries. Hit into the ‘corridor of uncertainty’ between United’s back four and goalkeeper, they were begging for a touch, but Arsenal somehow failed to convert the chances. 当阿森那占据了球权而且曼联还处於高度压迫的时候，在最後的关键20分钟，Sagna 找到了在右路的空挡，并持续将球送到禁区里。他的传中制造了两次机会，但是他也有 两次不成功的传球，那是可以再踢更好的。把球传到曼联的四名後卫和门将中间，但阿 森那却没办法把机会转化为进球。 http://imgur.com/RccHx3k Sagna的传中路线图 Wenger had replaced Cazorla with Nicolas Bendtner to provide an extra aerial threat in the box, which further encouraged Arsenal to cross the ball. Meanwhile, Moyes was concerned about Sagna’s freedom so introduced Ryan Giggs in place of Kagawa, with instructions to stop the crosses. Sagna still got plenty of room, however, and this showed the fine line (just one Arsenal player providing a touch on a cross) between Moyes’ strategy being regarded as ‘highly successful’ and ‘naive’. Wenger用Bendtner换下了Cazorla因为他可以在禁区内高空球有更高的威胁，这也鼓 舞了枪手们给出传中球。同时Moyes认为给Sagna太多空间了所以放上了Giggs取代Kagawa 来减少他的传中球，但Sagna还是有很多空档。无论如何，这个结果(只有一个阿森那球员 在传中的时候有碰到球)显示了Moyes的战术在高度成功和缺乏经验之间有了一个良好的思 路。 Conclusion 结论 There were two different Manchester United sides here – the positive, possession-orientated side of the first ten minutes, and the increasingly defensive, narrow side that just about dealt with continual Arsenal pressure. United should have created more chances with the former approach, and made more decisive clearances with the latter approach, but there’s reason to be positive about the variation in strategy. 总的来说曼联的战术分为两部分，比较积极的是以控球为取向的前十分钟，和更趋於 防守，压缩空间，并且要应付来自阿森那的持续威胁的防守面向。曼联进攻时应该要制造 出更多机会，然後在防守时要做更多决定性的清球。这就是为什麽要在战术的多样性上持 续更积极。 Arsenal were far from their best, with their passing extremely sloppy throughout the game, and penetration only arriving after substitutions. Sagna ’s crossing was a positive, and having created goals against Napoli and Liverpool, he has been a key part of Arsenal’s season so far. 阿森那本场并不是他们的最佳表现，从那些整场都极度迟缓的传球就可以发现，只有 在换上替补时才展现他们的穿透性传球。Sagna的传中非常积极，并且在对上Napoli和 利物浦时都制造了进球，从本赛季开始到现在，他一直在扮演一个关键的角色。 source: http://www.zonalmarking.net/2013/11/13/manchester-united-1-0-arsenal-united-start-positively-then-defend-extremely-narrow/ http://tinyurl.com/kludq5h --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 76.171.91.115 ※ 编辑: simonohmygod 来自: 76.171.91.115 (11/15 06:18) ※ 编辑: simonohmygod 来自: 76.171.91.115 (11/17 08:35)