刚刚有朋友问到了类似的问题 我去翻了一下规则 在2010/10/01的规则版本中 似乎又跟这位版友的所说的版本有出入了 当然应该是官方有更动规则啦 连索引号码都不一样了 ※ 引述《tquendi (tquendi)》之铭言： : =========================================================================== : 下面这部份是关於在双头巨人战中，攻击防守方玩家的定义。 : 806.8b : Any one-shot effect that refers to the "defending player" refers : to one specific defending player, not to both of the defending players. : The controller of the effect chooses which one the spell or ability : refers to at the time the effect is applied. The same is true for any : one-shot effect that refers to the "attacking player." : Any characteristic-defining ability that refers to the"defending player" : refers to one specific defending player, not to both of the defending : players. The controller of the object with the characteristic-defining : ability chooses which one the ability refers to at the time the nonactive : players become defending players. : All other cases in which the "defending player" is referred to actually : refer to both defending players. If the reference involves a positive : comparison (such as asking whether the defending player controls an Island) : or a relative comparison (such as asking whether you control more creatures : than the defending player), it gets only one answer. This answer is "yes" : if either defending player in the comparison would return a "yes" answer : if compared individually. If the reference involves a negative comparison : (such as asking whether the defending player controls no black permanents), : it also gets only one answer. This answer is "yes" if performing the : analogous positive comparison would return a "no" answer. The same is true : for all other cases that refer to the "attacking player." : 写的落落长，没误解的话大致上的意思就是。 : 进攻的那组所有玩家都是攻击玩家，被攻击的那组都是防守玩家。 : 只要是有一个异能或是效应在指定描述攻击或是防守玩家的时候， : 效应只会取其中一个人生效。 : 但是其他不是效应指定的所有情况下，防守玩家就表示守方所有的玩家。 : 这时候效应是以逻辑检定为准。只要对其中一个玩家的逻辑判断成立 : 整个效应就视为成立。 : 举例来说，海岛行者的能力是"假如防守玩家控制一个海岛，就XXXXX" : 只要防守玩家其中一个人操控海岛，那麽海岛行者的攻击就不能被阻挡。 : 同哩，如果效应的逻辑检定是以负面表述也是相同的道理。 : =========================================================================== 下面是我刚翻到的 802.2a Any rule, object, or effect that refers to a "defending player" refers to one specific defending player, not to all of the defending players. If an ability of an attacking creature refers to a defending player, or a spell or ability refers to both an attacking creature and a defending player, then unless otherwise specified, the defending player it's referring to is the player that creature was attacking at the time it became an attacking creature that combat, or the controller of the planeswalker that creature was attacking at the time it became an attacking creature that combat. If a spell or ability could apply to multiple attacking creatures, the appropriate defending player is individually determined for each of those attacking creatures. If there are multiple defending players that could be chosen, the controller of the spell or ability chooses one. Example: Rob attacks Alex with Runeclaw Bear and attacks Carissa with a creature with mountainwalk. Whether the creature with mountainwalk is unblockable depends only on whether Carissa controls a Mountain. 现在只要是提到防守玩家的规则，物品，或效应，都是指定一个防守方玩家 而不是整个防守方 刚好最後面就用山脉行者做范例 ROB用符爪熊打ALEX 用有山脉行者的生物打CARISSA 该有山脉行者的生物能否被阻挡 只以CARISSA有没有控制山脉来判定 我朋友刚刚的问题是 如果用鬼怪向导攻击 是两人都要翻牌库顶 还是只要被打的人翻? 照这规则来看 答案是只要被打的人翻 这回答应该没错吧? 如果我理解有误请纠正我 谢谢 --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 125.230.112.165