作者mistylake (那时 所谓的永远...)
看板LadyGaga
标题[新闻] BillBoard: 99-cent的BTW如何对Gaga唱片公司造成伤害
时间Wed Jun 15 10:52:00 2011
Billboard的另外一篇关於Amazon 99-cent销售的文章
探讨Amazon的廉价促销对Gaga所属唱片公司所带来的伤害
论点:
唱片公司铺货高达210万张
如果唱片公司提前得知Amazon的低价促销的话 他们一定会降低铺货量
一般而言 铺货量多为首周实体唱片预估销售数字的两倍之内
在Gaga这个例子则是达到了4.7比1
由於太多销售量都被Amazon抢去 实体CD销量降低
零售商店为了要库存管理及提高现金 将会有大量退货的现象
各家唱片公司对於Amazon的做法都感到不满
Amazon主管
"Gaga专辑的价值当然超过99 cents, 所以当它被以99 cents的价格促销的时候
大家才会疯狂抢购-------如果不是这样, 根本不会有人在意的...."
Let's get one thing straight. The Lady Gaga 99 cent sale for 'Born This Way'
was a great thing for the artist, and for Amazon. On a short-term basis, you
could even make the case that it was great for the industry.
The 99 cent sale was big mainstream-media news, and that certainly benefited
everyone, including other retailers. The album sold 1.1 million
units--662,000 digital, 449,000 physical--in its debut week ending May 29,
according to Nielsen SoundScan.
The story lasted all week in the press. It worked the same way that Target
and Best Buy circulars work: driving traffic to everyone's stores, not just
those two big-box chains, or, in this case, Amazon's site. I'd argue that the
glitch arising when Amazon's overwhelmed servers couldn't satisfy customer
demand was a good thing, too, since it made the sale even bigger news. Given
Amazon's impeccable service reputation, that blip won't hurt it long term.
For the cost of $3.3 million-that is, $8.40 wholesale minus 99 cents retail
times 443,000 scans during the two-day sale-Amazon put itself on the map as a
digital music merchant, in a way that the same amount of money spent on
traditional advertising could never have bought.
But whether the sale helps Interscope remains to be seen. First, Interscope
and Universal Music Group Distribution (UMGD) shipped 2.1 million album units
before street date. If they knew in advance of Amazon's sale, you can bet
they would've cut back on the initial CD allotment.
As is, Interscope has an inventory liability, with some merchants saying they
need to return product. And if some of that talk comes from a few retail
accounts being miffed over the Amazon deal, some is also due to simple math.
The CD album sold 449,000 units of the 2.1 million shipped, for a 21.4
percent sell-through. Second-week sales are at 174,000 units (136,000 CDs),
or 27.8 percent sell-through.
A decade ago, major-label shipment formulas called for shipping three units
for everyone expected to be scanned in the first week. Nowadays, with a more
efficient inventory replenishment, the ratio has dipped under 2-to-1.
But in Lady Gaga's case, UMGD shipped 4.7 units for each first-week scan.
Even another big hit single, which would ensure a sooner sell-through of all
2.1 million units, won't stop merchants now from returning the album to
improve their cash position. Interscope is probably looking at a few hundred
thousand returns, depending on whether the label comes up with a sweetener to
keep inventory in stores.
Competing labels and distributors may be even angrier than merchants about
the sale. "This was a really bad move," the head of an independent
distributor says. "Ninety-nine cents is almost free."
"If this happened in the 1990s, there would have been a big hue and cry from
retail, even bigger than what it was this time," the head of sales at a major
label says.
But these are different times. And in the digital world, "there are going to
be times when music is the toy in the Happy Meal," a UMG executive says.
Another Universal exec adds, "If Amazon tries to turn 99 cent superstar
albums into a regular thing, I would be outraged."
Yet, some suggest that a few label marketers themselves may now start pushing
such a pricing strategy to break an artist, or get an album into the No. 1
spot. Others say that, in the '90s, that inevitably would've followed-but not
in today's market, when profit trumps chart success.
For all the talk about how the industry has evolved, though, former
distribution executive Jim Caparro says, "It is shocking how consistent the
industry is with the past. Today, it is almost parallel to how traditional
music retail acted back then, with big accounts looking to steal market share
by pricing."
But one executive familiar with Amazon's thinking says the Gaga pricing won't
hurt the industry.
"Of course 'Born This Way' is worth more than 99 cents," the executive says.
"That's why it created such retail excitement and buzz, when it was offered
for 99 cents ... If it wasn't actually worth more, no one would have cared."
--
所谓真相
其实都只是表相...
http://friend.top1069.com/user/mistylake
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 69.140.81.243
1F:推 ayuELT:然後还有一大堆hater在那边说这是唱片公司跟Amazon乔好的 06/15 18:01
2F:→ ayuELT:唉 06/15 18:01
3F:→ ayuELT:乔好的话实体出货量不会那麽多吧 06/15 18:02
4F:推 Lovemei:实体出货就唱片公司太过高估啊 本来一开始是不会破百万的~ 06/15 18:48
5F:→ Lovemei:出货後发现各家预估破不了百万所以就有人说赶紧0.99破破看 06/15 18:50
6F:→ mistylake:唱片公司本就没预期会破百万吧? 是在Amazon促销後才估计 06/15 19:15
7F:→ mistylake:会破百万张的 BB前文中有提到当初销售量是一直上修的 06/15 19:16
8F:推 kissahping:0.99破破看也是实体专辑0.99,大量铺货的实体专辑,又 06/15 22:16
9F:→ kissahping:不是不需要太多成本的数位专辑。 06/15 22:16
10F:→ kissahping:要是知道Amazon会搞这招,实体根本就不会铺那麽多量。 06/15 22:17