原网址：http://ppt.cc/b5qJ Byron Mullens key stats: PPG RPG Pp36 Rp36 FG% 3pt% 12-13 10.6 6.4 14.2 8.5 38.5 31.7 Career 8.4 4.8 14.4 8.3 40.3 30.1 (热身赛 12.75 4.25 39.1 36.4 in 23.5MPG) Wow. Yikes. I mean, I knew those stats were there, but it still hurts to see them. The 14/8.5 per 36 is actually decent... not great but passable at least. But he is 7 feet tall and he makes less than 40% of his shots from the field. A huge part of the problem is his tendency to chuck up threes (over a third of his attempted shots last year were from deep, almost 4 attempts a game) without making a passable percentage of them. 恩…我想表格的数据已经很清楚，不过看了还真的是很糟。14/8.5 per 36 看起来蛮OK的 ，不是很好但至少也还说得过去。但Mullens有7尺高，命中率却低於40%…很大的原因是 因为他倾向投3分球(上一季，每场大概会投4颗3分，占了他出手次数3分之一以上)，但也 没有投出合格的命中率。 If there's a player in the league who shoots more threes than Mullens while making a lower percentage of them, I'd like to know who he is. But yet, that's why Mullens is here. He's a Clipper because Doc wants him to take that shot, and Doc wants him to stretch the floor. Mullens has shot 8-26 from deep in three pre-season games so far as a Clipper. Granted, that's a remarkably small sample size, but 30.7% from deep is hardly inspiring- in fact, it's detrimental to team success. 我还真想知道联盟里还有谁投3分次数比Mullens多命中率却比他低的…但那也是为什麽 Mullens会加入快艇。Doc就是希望他投3分，希望能藉由他拉开空间。Mullens在前3场热 身赛的3分表现状况为8-26，当然目前样本数实在太少，不过30.7%的命中率仍难以为他说 些甚麽，事实上这对於快艇的成功非常不利。 It's a tough situation for Mullens. He certainly wants to take those threes, and he's not completely inept at shooting (for example, I doubt that DeAndre Jordan would be able to make over 30% if he shot all of Mullens' threes). On top of that, Doc Rivers is telling him to shoot. AND, because his shot is so ineffective, other defenses WANT BJ to be taking these shots. Think about it. If the Clippers were playing a team with a 7' center who shot 30% from deep but took the shot every time he was open, wouldn't you want them to let him shoot? 这对Mullens来说实在是很艰困的情况，他喜欢投3分但却无法办法有效率拿下分数(Ex: 我怀疑搞不好DJ来投3分都不会这麽糟XDDD)最重要的是，Doc告诉他尽管投3分，也因为他 投得实在不是很有效率，所以防守者会很希望给他投3分。想想看，如果快艇和一个有7尺 高的中锋的队伍比赛，虽然3分命中率只有3成但能把握每一次他空档的3分，你还会让他 继续投下去吗？ This combination of factors is what leads to the crazy stat lines that we've seen so far (1-7, 3-7, 4-12 from deep in each of the three games). Those are remarkably high numbers of three pointers attempted for one game. If Mullens was a 35% shooter, other teams would respect his shot more, and he'd get less looks. But his only options right now are to either shoot a low percentage on a ton of shots a night, or pass up shots that his coach wants him to take- both are very effective methods towards landing himself a seat on the bench. 综合以上因素也就是让我们看到目前的状况(前3场热身赛3分状况：1-7，3-7，4-12)这是 令人注目的场均3分高出手次数。如果Mullens拥有35%的3分命中率，对方一定会注意他且 不会让他出手次数这麽多。但Mullens现在唯一的选择不是在一晚投了很多球且命中率很 低就是把那些Doc希望他投得球传出去，这两项都是非常有效的方法让他争取温板凳的机 会。(不太懂最後一句是不是揶揄BM，还是真的甚麽有效的方法@@) The issue of Mullens' shooting is compounded by the fact that he really doesn't do a whole lot else well on the basketball court. He isn't a strong banger, he doesn't rebound particularly well, and watching him replace DeAndre Jordan defensively is like watching Shaq run the 100M in place of Usain Bolt- he's not just a step or half-step slower to react, he's a full 2 or 3 steps slower. While Byron is a better rebounder, defender, and finisher than Steve, he's almost Steve Novak minus the shooting. Which is, you know, nothing. 关於Mullens的问题是，在场上除了投篮外却没有贡献太多的能力。他不是个强悍的球员 ，尤其他篮板能力不是很好，看他替补DJ做防守就像看Shaq取代Usain Bolt跑100公尺。( 注：Usain Bolt，被视为跑步最快的运动员，曾同时拥有100m和200m最快的纪录)他防守 反应不仅是和别人差了1步或1步半，是根本慢到差了起码2、3步。或许Mullens的篮板能 力、防守、和终结能力比Steve Novak好，但他缺少Novak的投篮能力，你知道的…就真的 甚麽也不是… So where does this guy fit in to the rotation? It all depends. Like I conceded above, 26 threes is a VERY small sample size by which to judge a shooter, and it's certainly not anywhere near time to give up on Mullens as a potential rotation player. If he can shoot about 34% from three this season, then he's probably worth it as long as he limits his attempts to less than 12 a game and fights hard on defense and on the glass. If he can get that shot up to 35% or 36% then all the better, but I'm not counting on that. So, how can Mullens improve his shooting? The obvious answer is to practice his shooting and work on mechanics and just be a little less like himself and a little more like Ray Allen. However, if there was some magical practice formula guaranteed to raise a players' shooting percentage, everyone would be doing it. The real way that Mullens is likely to raise his shooting percentage is through raising his shot quality, which I'll split up into three parts: shot location, shot selection, and shot type. 所以这家伙到底要怎麽融入这个队伍?就像我说的，3场的样本数真的太少且也还不到时候 放弃把Mullens当作浅力球员的可能。如果他能有34%的3分命中率，只要他能控制在出手 次数12次以内且认真的做好防守的状况下，那已经值得了。如果他能拥有35%甚至36%的话 ，那是再好也不过的，不过目前我可不会这麽指望。所以Mullens该如何增加他的命中率 ？很明显的答案是多练习投篮以及团队默契的合作，把自己稍稍假想为Ray Allen。当然 ，如果真的有这种魔法般的练习，能使球员的命中率提高，那每个人都一定会这麽做。真 正的方法是Mullens要透过提升他的投篮品质，也就是：投篮位置、投篮时机选择、投篮 的形式。 ‧Shot Location: This one is something that I've seen readers clamoring for in the comments. Shooters tend to do better from the corner, which makes sense- those shots aren't from as far away as the rest of the three point shots. BJ just has to find his sweet spots. Maybe he struggles with the straight away three but hits a higher percentage from the left wing. This heat graph, taken from Mullens' basketball-reference.com page, suggests what one would suspect: Mullens scores way more points per shot from the corners than anywhere else. 投篮位置─射手似乎都在底角3分表现得比较好，也就是说这个位置相较其他位置离篮框 并没有那麽远。Mullens必须找出他擅长投篮的位置。或许他的3分能力不佳，但他在左翼 却有比较好的命中率。从图中可显示，Mullens在底角3分得命中率比其他位置好很多。( 我不知道怎麽把图附上来@@) (straight away three：是指从弧顶投出的3分? 还是他投3分这回事啊? 有请大大解惑) ‧Shot Selection: This has to do with how tough of a shot he's taking, which I haven't really had an issue with from what I've seen of pre-season action, but I know what supposedly an issue with his play in Charlotte. How contested are his shots? Jamal Crawford tends to have horrible shot selection, but he's simply talented and able to make tough shots. If he didn't make those shots... he wouldn't be as well liked to say the least. Mullens seems to be taking threes when he's wide open (which is no coincidence- defenses are leaving him), so his shot selection would seem to have improved from last season. 投篮选择─他投篮选择到底有多糟呢?在热身赛中我目前还没有看到太多的问题，不过上 一季他在山猫队的时候，大概能推敲出他投篮选择上有问题。尻佛已经是非常投篮选择能 力很差的球员，但起码他有这个能力把这些difficult shot投进。Mullens目前投3分都是 在空档的状况下，所以我猜Mullens的投篮选择能力有比上一季好。 ‧Shot Type: Again, this is off of a very small sample size, but I feel like Mullens has been taking almost all of his threes so far on pick-and-pop. Most of these pick-and-pop shots come from the wings and straightaway (it's unusual for there to be a ball screen in the dead corner). So perhaps by limiting himself to less shots off of pops while continuing to catch and shoot on kick outs, he can raise his percentage. The difference here is that on a pick and pop, most players are moving either backwards or sideways into their shots (they shouldn't- they should be getting depth and stepping into their shots- but they do). This is a sharp contrast to taking a one-two or hop-step into a shot off of a kick out. 投篮形式─再一次强调，3场的热身赛样本数实在太小，但我发现Mullens的3分目前几乎 都是在pick&pop时投出，这些都出现弧顶两翼。所以如果能限制他在pick&pop的出手次数 改由在队友kick out(切入禁区後分球)给Mullens做catch&shoot，可以增加他的命中率。这边不同的地 方是，pick&pop，大部分球员不是往後场就是往两边做投射，这跟kick out在移动一两步 或是一个垫步进行投篮有很大的对比。 (这边我不太懂括号里那段的意思 ....) Now it's hard to identify which of these is the problem (if not all). Does Byron shoot better from the corner because he gets more kick outs there and less pick-and-pop, or is it because the corners are just closer and he really shoots better on pops than kick outs? This isn't something that's easily answered off of the very limited shots that we get to see him take in games; rather, it's something that Doc has to notice a trend in during the thousands of reps that BJ is hopefully taking in practice. 现在还很难判断这几个问题哪个才是重点。Mullens在底角3分比较准是因为比较多的 kick outs和比较少的pick&pop的因素，还是因为底角真的离比较近且他在pick&pop的表 现也比kick outs好呢?这些问题在这目前几场比赛真的很难回答。 Regardless of how the backup big situation sorts itself out, the Clippers will likely be forced to rely on Mullens for meaningful minutes in regular season games, especially at the beginning of the year. So let's not simply condemn BJ as the next Brian Cook- instead, have faith that, in conjunction with Doc, he'll be able to diagnose and correct his issues in order to raise his shooting percentage and be the stretch big that the Clippers have so desperately needed. 不管这个问题如何，快艇在正规赛一定会依赖Mullens在一定时间的贡献。所以我们不要 谴责他为Brian Cook第二，而是要对他有信心在Doc的体系下，他会找出并更正他的问题 ─提升命中率以及禁区的守护，这些是快艇迫切需要的。 (注：查了一下wiki，Brain Cook也曾是快艇球员，也是6尺9却爱投3分的PF/C) 短评： 会想翻这篇主要是我想大家都不是很清楚DOC签BM的用意是甚麽吧XDDD 我自己也没很清楚XDDDD 就给大家参考参考XDD 感觉作者真的在说服自己相信BM会很好的XDDDDDDD 我想河流就是希望Mullens能藉由3分把禁区整个拉宽，毕竟对方也不可能完全不理会 Mullens，把大个子钓出来，对於後卫切入空间会大很多。 有我们引以为傲的後场在，Mullens必然可外围3分等妙传也可以禁区冲抢，能提升战术的 运用，当然前提是Mullens的三分一定要稳定输出 不然真的会颇惨@@ 另外希望他的防守能力也能展现出来，一个7尺中锋就是要守护快艇禁区阿!!! --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 114.25.176.151 ※ 编辑: totemist 来自: 114.25.176.151 (10/18 21:58) ※ 编辑: totemist 来自: 114.25.176.151 (10/18 22:14) ※ 编辑: totemist 来自: 114.25.176.151 (10/18 22:16)