看到有人在推文提到，能不能让三巨头修改合约，自动降薪之类的。 当然因为有很多尼克迷早在季後赛之前就担心着未来XD 所以Alan Hahn在 Knicks fix里就有特别说到，(我倒是印象我有看过更详细的，但是忘记在哪了...) RESTRUCTURE CONJECTURE So many of you have asked about the possibility of the team's highest-paid players, Melo ($20.4 million in 2012-13) and Amar'e ($19.9 million) restructuring their respective contracts to open up some salary cap space so the Knicks can go after another free agent. The fact is the new collective bargaining agreement does include a restructuring provision. But the rule is written in such a way that neither the players, nor the team, are eligible to do it. It's really an inane provision in the agreement when you consider the restrictions. For starters, a team has to already be under the salary cap for restructuring to be permitted. And after that, the player has to be three years into his current contract. 要让先发球员重写合约，球队本身就要先在薪资帽之下，然後球员的合约又得先满三年。 You can thank both the NBA and the players union for this. The union did not want a rule that would create public pressure for a player to restructure to help a team that has made poor contract decisions and needed help. The NBA did not want to see players get monster contracts only to immediately restructure to create room for more monster contracts. 会这样写的立意点是，球员方不希望会有(像尼克现在的)公众压力要求球员自动降薪，而 因此损失。而联盟方不希望已经有大约的球员，透过这种方式帮助球队签下其他大约。 So forget restructuring as a means to alleviate cap issues for the Knicks or open up room to make a play for another free agent. The Miami Heat's Big Three had it right when they each agreed to take less than the maximum in order to fit each other and still field a decent team around them. Even then, that roster is extremely shallow, so it puts even more emphasis on good drafting and waiver pick ups. 热火三巨头一刚开始就做了对的决定，各自都少拿一些。帮助球队不仅能签他们三个， 也可以签一些功能性球员。但即使是这样，他们的阵容还是不甚充实。所以这就是为什麽 选秀跟捡球员这麽重要了。 ------------------------------------------------- 心得: 个人造业个人担啊... --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 64.30.87.135