http://www.sactownroyalty.com/2009/12/10/1194387/spurs-offense-explodes-kings-fall 马刺今夏的目标很明确，要增强他们的进攻，这也是为什麽他们找来了新的先发小前 锋RJ。RJ早在篮网时期就被大家承认他的得分能力，所以马刺确认这就是他们想要的。这 个补强在今晚看来是十分正确的，RJ痛宰了我们的防守，让马刺在长人表现并不突出的情 况下赢球。 Parker和Ginobili同样也功不可没，马刺在三分线上投九中八。国王的防守问题很明 显有个洞，我们完全挡不出Parker（不过这个联盟又有多少球队能封死Parker）。这让我 们在上半场总是苦苦追赶。国王在下半场给了对手些压力，但这些压力只是告诉对手，我 们还在场上而已。 蜂报记者Jason Jones 点明了一件事，国王上场超过二十分钟的球员里，有超过三年 NBA 经验的，仅有Beno Udrih一人。这让场上看来是一群大学球员在对抗一群老球皮，那 批人已经有三只冠军戒了，而且更重要的是他们有一位名叫Tim Duncan的球员。 国王奋战不懈，虽然第二节被人家打了十四比零，但国王总会试图再追回来，这样的 情形在下半场又发生了三次，直到我们再也追不上为止。 Casspi今天有些不错的成绩，二十分和七篮板。Evans 今天没那麽有效率，这是他近 四场最糟的一场，但还是有19/4/5，另外加上四个抄截。JT和Hawes 今天在场上努力对抗 Duncan，Hawes 有个好的开局，JT则在下半场交出贡献。Greene在比赛末段有些回神，他 为场上带来些能量。 以我个人来看这是一场「值得称赞的失败」。 -- http://www.sactownroyalty.com/2009/12/9/1193061/dont-blame-the-argentine-hornets Don't Blame the Argentine: Hornets 96, Kings 94 当你们责备那个罚球罚不进的球员时，请不要忘记，到底是谁捉下那个珍贵的进攻篮 板，为我们制造了一个追平的机会。 自从2002年以来，我们一直都在讨论缺了什麽。悲剧的第七场有很多原因，最让人心 痛的，当然是Peja和Doug的面包。Peja成了一个失败的人物，就好像他从没在关键时刻砍 进三分过。大家也都会说Doug承受不住压力，而忘记了他为我们带来的演出。 Noci是个好球员，虽然他的罚球并不是非常准，但世界上没有百分之百罚球命中的球 员。也许是在第二节失手，也许是在关键时刻没进。我们没有一个方法让这些球一定会进 。 让Noci的话题仅止於此。这对国王是个可惜的失败，我们应该可以捉下这一胜的。我 们今天让对手感受到了压力。JT今晚的表现很成熟，在被吹了今人置疑的第六次犯规後， 他选择了乖乖离开球场而不是对裁判大叫。这个离场一定让他很难受，他不能在关键时刻 为我们固守禁区、进攻篮框。 Sergio今天做了些错误的尝试，但他不是为了让自已上十大好球，而是太急於为球队 追回分数。他这样一位「传球第一」的球员难免会在风险下传球。当然这种球在没有成功 的情况下就会成了失误。 One NBA trope that has always bothered me was the idea that your best player had to take every game-on-the-line possession. You'll remember the whole LeBron saga of 2006, when The Chosen One drove the lane on the Cavaliers' final deficit possession of a playoff game against the Pistons ... and he passed off to a lesser teammate, who had an open three due to the defense LeBron drew. James wasn't exactly castigated for the decision -- he had his defenders -- but it drew a ton of discussion, with the central thrust that the greatest players don't pass. They want the ball. They want the fate of the game to carry their mark, their DNA. I never really bought that this was smart. Studies have shown that efficiency on these plays goes way, way down -- because the offense becomes predictable (high screen for LeBron) and the defenses can key in (collapse the lane). I always figured that if you have Kobe and Pau, maybe run a post play for Pau. He's good, too. 我一直好奇，一个最好的球员到底是怎样，是能够掌握球场上的一切吗？LeBron在 2006对上活塞时，最後的进攻时他传给了队友，这个队友因为LeBron的切入而得到了巨大 的三分空档。到底James 是不是该自已来呢？伟大的球星总希望能把球拿在手中，他们要 掌握球队的命运，而胜败也将留下他们的标记。之前我从不认为这是聪明的事，因为对手 会将防守重点摆在你的球星身上，进攻也变得更好预测。如果我的手上有Kobe和Pau ，那 麽我会觉得Pau 的低位比较有可能会成功。 But when Tyreke Evans drove the lane in the final Sacramento possession, I think I understood. I don't really believe in basketball mystics all that much (see my first point in this post) and I don't think the NBA's superstars have a different blood type than the hoi polloi. Superstars are just really super star players. As such, if the defense aims to make the superstar weak at the expense of putting a lesser player in super position to score, then the lesser player with the super position ought to be called upon. But having the type of dominant player we have in Reke might have changed my thinking, at least in these boom-boom cases, where there hasn't been a time-out. Coming down the floor, do you rely on your best player in perhaps tougher-than-usual circumstances, or do you rely on your B-list? I mean, if the Kings gave the ball to Beno, given the way Evans had been getting to the rim, I might have been apopletic. And Beno played great! Even with share-happy teams, the NBA is such an individualist sport. When one player can affect as much as LeBron, Wade, Howard, Paul or Evans can, you're foolish not to let them try to affect the game in the final moments. Without Kevin Martin in action, the Kings did not have a better option than Evans driving the lane. He did, he nearly got the winning basket, and Nocioni got the offensive rebound and a chance to tie the game. That last possession didn't work out, but it went well, if you know what I mean, and I think you do. 但当Evans 切入的时刻，我想我明白了。我之前并不那麽信仰球星的力量，我也不认 为超级巨星就跟其他人的血型有什麽差别。现在我得承认巨星就是巨星，当你把一个次级 球员摆在那个位置，他就是不能做到那些事。但当你有一个像Reke这样有主宰力的球员就 会改变你的想法。没有暂停的时刻，场上正在前所未有的紧要关头，你会把球交给你的王 牌还是其他人？比方说Beno，而不让Reke朝篮框进攻？Beno很抱歉，你打得非常好。即使 在彼此分享篮球的欢乐队伍中，你的队上又有LeBron、Wade、Howard、Paul甚或Evans ， 你不会蠢到不让王牌来主宰这个时刻。没有KM在队上，国王的唯一选择就是Evans 。而他 也几乎做到了。虽然最後的结果你我都知，但我想说的是什麽你应该懂了。 And if I may, in closing: Spencer Hawes played really well. His defense was active and smart. His offense was fine. I will take that Spencer Hawes seven days a week. 最後我要说Spencer Hawes 打得不错，他的防守主动又聪明。进攻也不错。我希望每 一周都能看到这样的Hawes 七天。 -- 有两段我觉得怎样翻都不够完整的留下原文，有错请指正<(__ __)> 以上文章都是来自球迷，你可以觉得对可以觉得错，可以觉得本文没内容 -- 简单学英语 n. Desmond Masonitis 例句：Nocioni is the latest to suffer from Desmond Masonitis. -- Paul Westphal：「How you gonna learn? If you don't go through it.」 --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 125.224.132.94 ※ 编辑: santabrelai 来自: 125.224.132.94 (12/11 00:15)