我已经写至少三封信给Grassley...用了三个以前我在IOWA的地址 也许一个人的力量很小,但我们要把自己的观点告诉senator 遇到大陆的支持者,也尽量分析为何HR3012也是对他门有害, 我朋友跟我说,印度这些移民团体,每年都会游说这个法案 可能往年不成功,但今年出乎意外的竟然通过众院...(APPLE赚太多了...财团想 要多一些工程师吗? @__@) 以下是我写的: Dear Senator Grassley, I appreciate your hold upon HR3012, which is a distortion of fairness and also a negative impact on American's current job market for high-skilled Americans. HR3012 is a product of strong lobbying immigration groups made up of majority of Indian immigrants. Nowadays, immigration demographic has contained 21% of India, which is an overwhelming percentage; once HR3012 passes, we can foresee more on the immigration pie chart. Secondly, I truly believe US definitely views national defense and security over economic benefit since national security is the root of everything we build up on this land. High tech industry especially includes many national secrets itself; I would foresee a future when high-tech industry will be dominantly controlled by newly immigrants who have strong origins with foreign countries, which are exactly well-known rivalry enemies to US in the world. Now the supporters of HR3012 claimed they would like to be treated as fair in immigration. However, the result of HR3012 will give them the best benefits at the cost of all the other immigrants from other countries around the world. The fairness is not real fairness. Rather, it is preferentially fair to one major country alone. Iowa City is my spiritual hometown when I first arrived in US 5 years ago. I graduated from University of Iowa as a Master of Accounting student and now I have worked for 3 years in audit, tax, and accounting industry as a professional. My job is to aid a Taiwanese-owned American company to reconnect to the international accounting standards so American system can merge with international one as SEC advocates nowadays. I am from a democratic country and now US has classed my country as one candidate to be visa-exempt in the future. I feel proud to be an immigrant to contribute to the diversity and workforce to US even though I may be just part of minority group. And I feel deeply proud that my original country has maintained great relationship with US, which makes us always see US as a friend, not an enemy. This country needs people with integrity, those who keep the final gates to maintain American spirits and security. As a senior member in Senate, I believe you are the one to keep the gate and will keep the gate in the future. ※ 引述《cancun (yay)》之铭言： : 我刚才写信给Senator了 : 请大家一人一信 向Senator表示反对意见! : http://www.grassley.senate.gov/contact.cfm : ________________________ : Message: Senator Grassley - : Please oppose HR 3012. : This bill tries to create "equalness" but not "fairness". : Because the majority of the applications are from India and China, if this : bill is passed, it works advantage to these two countries only. : And it's not fair to the rest of world. If you believe in diversity, if you : believe in true fairness, please opposite this bill. : Sincerely, : S : ※ 引述《nikerniker (nikerniker)》之铭言： : : 觉得大部分的ROWer都高估15%-10%保护条款了 : : 以EB2为例子,如果仔细想想: : : fact 1: ROW一年用到50%名额 : : fact 2: TSC积压了8个月的I-485, NSC则是4个月,两个Center粗略平均有半年的案件 : : fact 3: 若是HR3012通过了,2012年ROW只有15%名额,2013:10%,2014:10% : : calculation: : : TSC+NSC积件半年=25%的名额 (因为fact 1,一年=50%) : : 2012+2013 ROW的quota=10%+15%=25% : : conclusion: : : 只要HR3012一通过,EB2 ROWer 在2014年之前不会有名额 : : 光是积件就可以把两年的名额消化光 : : 这样的分析也许粗糙,有些数据高估有些低估,但是得到的结果令人警惕 : : 印度大陆讨论区几乎只分析EB2I 和 EB2C,没有甚麽ROW的预估分析 : : 更悲观的假设(比较不可能发生): : : 如果法案追朔至去年10月起的名额,这段时间通过的EB2约 : : 用了16%的名额(10,11,12,1 四个月: 50% / 12month * 4month =~ 16.6%) : : 那麽这16%就把2014的名额也用光了,反而会出现ROW排期比印度中国更长 : : 若还没送EB2 PERM可以考虑转攻EB2-NIW或EB1了 : : 继续写信给Senator吧 --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 99.26.192.151