Source: http://0rz.tw/kmL5V ********************************************************************* 哈米顿与艾佛森无法同时共存 By Dan Feldman - 2:50 am | May 28th, 2009 ********************************************************************* Besides a few minutes against Houston in January, it was clear Richard Hamilton and Allen Iverson didn’t complement each other on the court. Both commanded the ball, and neither provided much the other didn’t. Prompted by a comment from a “Bubachuck,” I did some digging into last season’s numbers. 作者针对本议题查了一些资料： Pistons with Iverson and not Hamilton: 6-2 (.750, equivalent to 62 wins during a full season) 当活塞+艾佛森 没有RIP时： 成绩是6胜2败。(7成5的胜率) Pistons with Hamilton and not Iverson: 14-7 (.667, 55 wins) 当活塞+哈米顿 没有AI时： 成绩是 14胜7败。(6成67的胜率) Pistons with both: 18-28 (.391, 32 wins) 当活塞同时有AI+RIP时： 成绩是 18胜28败。(3成91的胜率) Pistons with neither: 1-6 (.143, 12 wins) 当活塞同时缺AI+RIP时： 成绩是1胜6败。(1成43的胜率) I think this means a couple of things. 1. Rumors of Iverson’s demise might (emphasis on might) be exaggerated. 2. Detroit didn’t combust as much as it appears. If the Pistons had another role player instead of Iverson, they probably would have been pretty good. Could Joe Dumars’s have convinced Denver to throw in Linas Kleiza or Chris Andersen? Add one of them and cut Iverson immediately, Detroit probably would have been the fifth, maybe even fourth, seed. ********************************************************************* 数据是会说话的，可见AI若有被重用，活塞这一季结果一定不一样..... -- Only the strong survive- Iverson ⊕ ═█┘ ⊕ ●╱ 　　　 Ｗ ● ●︵ ● ●)) ３╯ <３\ /３⊕ ／３﹚ ３ \\ />⊕ >/ ⊕ ╲> >> ========= http://www.wretch.cc/blog/AWEI3 ========= --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 58.114.81.191