作者oplz (Go Patriots! Go Brady!)
站内IA
标题Re: [编译] 马侃有可能胜选的5个原因
时间Sun Aug 31 00:34:00 2008
Obama 会赢, 哈佛大学的搞笑诺贝尔网站说的..
Barack Obama Will Win the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election
Now that both major political parties have announced their nominees for
president and vice president, the Annals of Improbable Research U.S.
Presidential Election Algorithm (Debowy and Schulman 2003) can be used to
predict the results of the upcoming November election.
The algorithm was developed based on the experience of the major party
candidates for president and vice president in each of the 54 U.S.
presidential elections between 1789 and 2000 and correctly predicted the
outcome of the 2004 election.
According to the algorithm, being a United States Senator does not contribute
to one’s electability for president or vice president, so the Obama/Biden
ticket has a total electability of zero. In addition to his 22 years in the
Senate, John McCain spent four years in the U.S. House of Representatives,
giving him 4 points of presidential electability. However, he divorced his
first wife (-110 electability points), so he has a total presidential
electability of -106. Sarah Palin has been governor of Alaska for two years,
which means she has a vice presidential electability of 2 and the
McCain/Palin ticket has a total electability of -104.
The algorithm thus predicts that the Democratic ticket of Barack Obama and
Joe Biden will win the election in November. The fact that both major
political parties chose candidates with low electabilities when candidates
with high electability were availablesuggests that the validity of the Annals
of Improbable Research U.S. Presidential Election Algorithm is not yet
accepted by most major party primary voters in the United States, despite its
100% rate of successful predictions.
文章出处:
Improbable Research
http://tinyurl.com/6hgnks
使用的 algorithm:
http://members.verizon.net/%7Evze3fs8i/air/Elections.htm
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 134.174.140.104
※ 编辑: oplz 来自: 134.174.140.104 (08/31 00:36)
1F:推 MRZ:好机车的理论XD 08/31 00:49
2F:推 going90:XD 08/31 01:01
3F:推 vicklin:囧 08/31 02:05
4F:推 dblsesame:XD 2003年的algorithm 就算100% successful rate 08/31 06:53
5F:→ dblsesame:也只对过一次吧! on the other hand, no. of children 08/31 06:56
6F:→ dblsesame:one raised must factor heavily in McCain's formula. 08/31 06:57
7F:→ dblsesame:XD 08/31 06:58
8F:推 MRZ:楼上认真了,这种摆明就是在婊人的搞笑理论没有什麽好在乎的 08/31 10:41
9F:推 dblsesame:呃 没有认真阿 我说McCain拿小孩人数当公式是在开玩笑.. 08/31 11:51
10F:推 yeh67:麦肯输定了 一想到夏馨背後的军事工业复合体 我支持欧巴马 08/31 21:14
11F:推 ncyc:楼上支持的人还要增兵阿富汗呢 08/31 21:26
12F:推 yeh67:阿富汗问题得到联合国安理会的背书 08/31 21:41
13F:→ ncyc:一样是战争、一样会让军工复合体有利益 08/31 21:42
14F:推 swallow73:这点还真不得不同意n大,左派选民支持Nader吧 08/31 21:44
15F:推 ncyc:说得难听点,掀起战争就负起责任收拾局面,不是从一个战场撤 08/31 21:46
16F:→ ncyc:退然後转进另外一个战场 08/31 21:46
17F:→ yeh67:总之 更换不同党派的外交军事幕僚群 至少能让人憧憬未来 08/31 22:13
18F:→ ncyc:领导者可以换,但是官僚系统成员不可能全换 08/31 22:17