Headphone 板


LINE

对於不同的CD格式, 我们首先要看的, 是数位资讯如何的存在这些载体当中. CD 是采用 44.1kHz/16bit Stereo Pulse Code Modulation SHM-CD 是 2.8224 MHz Direct Stream Digital ( Please refer to that oversampling thing ) BluRay disk则不一定, BluRay支援许多格式(PCM, Digital Dolby, DTS... etc), 而且 有一些还是有损压缩, 而实际使用的格式才能决定他的品质. 也就是说, 从这些光碟里面读出来的资料不一定相同. 我猜测BluRay里面你们听到的应该 是192kHz/24bit PCM, 因为其他几乎都是有损压缩格式. 如果他采用有损压缩格式, 音质 必定会下降. 另外, 这三种格式的物理结构也有差距. 例如说BluRay的资料层较接近於表面, 所以他比 较容易被刮伤. 这些都会影响音质. ---------------------------------------------- 再来讨论CD to CD variation. 感谢louis0407兄提出的两篇论文 I've checked the Audio Engineering Society, and discovered that the two abovementioned paper actually cost twenty USD each. Therefore I doubt if you have actually read them before. I've to admit that I myself have not read them before as well, as I am not that rich to buy that paper. However, I have found later papers that are done by the same authors as the two abovementioned paper (Ian Dennis and Julian Dunn). The paper discussed the various possibilities that will cause two numerically identical Compact Disc to sound different. First of all, if the same digital data is feed to the DAC, it will produce the same analog waveform everytime, no matter where the digital data is from. However, there's one exception to the above statement, that is the power supply. We have to be aware that the two stepper motor used in the CD-ROM drive is inductive load, and due to the fast changing current, will cause the positive power rail to flunctuate if the power supply is not well designed. If the positive power rail flunctuates, it will be coupled into the internal Zener Diode voltage reference of the DAC. However, in modern CD Player design, the power supply for inductive loads ( the two motors ), the digital loads and the analog loads are completely seperated, that means it will not cause any observable change in the DAC output. Therefore, whatsoever that causes variation between CDs will cause the input to the DAC to change as well. In the paper, the authors addressed several issues, such as the different ways that a PCM signal could have been encoded in the CD-ROM, which might lead to differences between the master recording and the pressed CDs. As I've mentioned before, in the old times, because hardwares are not capable of that much calculation, they do not check if the data they read is erroneous, which leads to errors ( the so called jitters ) being passed onto the DAC, and leads to degradation of audio quality. In the paper, the author also carried out one mass listening test, and one "golden ear" listening test. However, neither of the two listening test is able to show that the difference between CDs, if any, is audiable, even to expert listener, or the so called "golden ears". In conclusion, if we are able to ensure that the motor noise doesn't get coupled into the sensitive analog circuits, and if use error correcting softwares to ensure that the data read from the CD-ROM drive is correct, we can be assured that there is no variation between audio CDs that are numerically equivalent. EDIT: The paper is at: http://www.prismsound.com/m_r_downloads/cdinvest.pdf --



※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 220.133.76.65 ※ 编辑: john0312 来自: 220.133.76.65 (07/08 11:37)
1F:推 SeaSprite:大推!! 07/08 15:12
2F:→ SeaSprite:懒的看全文可以看最後一段或最後一句 但推荐全读 07/08 15:14
3F:推 louis0407:我确实没看那三篇的全文 这一说起来 是我不够负责 07/08 16:49
4F:→ louis0407:不过这三篇论文是我在看一些讨论时 里面提到的 那篇讨论 07/08 16:50
5F:→ louis0407:的主题是为何cd听起来会不同 换句话说 他们是建立在 07/08 16:50
6F:→ louis0407:同曲目cd听起来会不同(即使数位资料一致)这个共识下 07/08 16:51
7F:→ louis0407:其中有提到一些相关的AES论文 因此我拿了几篇 本意只是 07/08 16:52
8F:→ louis0407:说明确实有这样的学术讨论 但只看过几段引用就乱贴 07/08 16:53
9F:→ louis0407:确实不甚恰当 这点我应该检讨 07/08 16:54
10F:推 louis0407:至於你的结论 你为何不亲自尝试? 还是你已做过听觉测试? 07/08 16:57
11F:→ louis0407:我的看法是我不质疑这件事的存在 但是我不清楚why 07/08 16:57
12F:推 louis0407:顺便建议一下 能把jitter,offset还有error分开吗 这样 07/08 17:12
13F:→ louis0407:会更容易厘清观念(或者说分歧) 对我来说 jitter和error 07/08 17:13
14F:→ louis0407:是不该混在一起互相替代的 虽然他们确实相关 07/08 17:13
15F:推 louis0407:刚又想到 想请教john兄 您对转盘端jitter对後端da影响 07/08 17:16
16F:→ louis0407:的看法是? 是直接否定jitter这完意对声音的影响还是 07/08 17:16
17F:→ louis0407:针对cd压制品质对声音的影响在质疑?? 感谢 07/08 17:17
18F:推 padro:我特别强调载体材质差异 就是对louis兄所说的有疑问阿XD 07/08 19:54







like.gif 您可能会有兴趣的文章
icon.png[问题/行为] 猫晚上进房间会不会有憋尿问题
icon.pngRe: [闲聊] 选了错误的女孩成为魔法少女 XDDDDDDDDDD
icon.png[正妹] 瑞典 一张
icon.png[心得] EMS高领长版毛衣.墨小楼MC1002
icon.png[分享] 丹龙隔热纸GE55+33+22
icon.png[问题] 清洗洗衣机
icon.png[寻物] 窗台下的空间
icon.png[闲聊] 双极の女神1 木魔爵
icon.png[售车] 新竹 1997 march 1297cc 白色 四门
icon.png[讨论] 能从照片感受到摄影者心情吗
icon.png[狂贺] 贺贺贺贺 贺!岛村卯月!总选举NO.1
icon.png[难过] 羡慕白皮肤的女生
icon.png阅读文章
icon.png[黑特]
icon.png[问题] SBK S1安装於安全帽位置
icon.png[分享] 旧woo100绝版开箱!!
icon.pngRe: [无言] 关於小包卫生纸
icon.png[开箱] E5-2683V3 RX480Strix 快睿C1 简单测试
icon.png[心得] 苍の海贼龙 地狱 执行者16PT
icon.png[售车] 1999年Virage iO 1.8EXi
icon.png[心得] 挑战33 LV10 狮子座pt solo
icon.png[闲聊] 手把手教你不被桶之新手主购教学
icon.png[分享] Civic Type R 量产版官方照无预警流出
icon.png[售车] Golf 4 2.0 银色 自排
icon.png[出售] Graco提篮汽座(有底座)2000元诚可议
icon.png[问题] 请问补牙材质掉了还能再补吗?(台中半年内
icon.png[问题] 44th 单曲 生写竟然都给重复的啊啊!
icon.png[心得] 华南红卡/icash 核卡
icon.png[问题] 拔牙矫正这样正常吗
icon.png[赠送] 老莫高业 初业 102年版
icon.png[情报] 三大行动支付 本季掀战火
icon.png[宝宝] 博客来Amos水蜡笔5/1特价五折
icon.pngRe: [心得] 新鲜人一些面试分享
icon.png[心得] 苍の海贼龙 地狱 麒麟25PT
icon.pngRe: [闲聊] (君の名は。雷慎入) 君名二创漫画翻译
icon.pngRe: [闲聊] OGN中场影片:失踪人口局 (英文字幕)
icon.png[问题] 台湾大哥大4G讯号差
icon.png[出售] [全国]全新千寻侘草LED灯, 水草

请输入看板名称,例如:BabyMother站内搜寻

TOP