作者Anonymous. (猜猜我是谁 ? ^o^)
看板HatePicket
标题[文章] 恶意赚钱
时间Fri Oct 9 19:03:19 2015
1.检举文章:
┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 文章代码(AID):
#1M5vERbk (Hate) [ptt.cc] [超干] 干你妈的论文 │
│ 文章网址:
https://webptt.com/cn.aspx?n=bbs/Hate/M.1444385691.A.96E.html │
│ 这一篇文章值 213 Ptt币 │
└─────────────────────────────────────┘
检举文章编号
72483
1010/09 likeair R: [超干] 垃圾不要来黑特
72484
210/09 JenniferG □ [黑特] 好饱
> 72485 310/09
bravo233295 □ [超干] 干你妈的论文
72486
10/09 ninelai □ [夭寿] 台中
72487
10/09 xessor □ [烦耶] 我掰…
欲检举文章内容
作者 bravo233295 (Dr. Tsai) 看板 Hate
标题 [超干] 干你妈的论文
时间 Fri Oct 9 18:14:45 2015
───────────────────────────────────────
Modeling Driver's Visual Attention Allocation
While Interacting with In-Vehicle Technologies
Abstact
In 2 experiments, the authers examined how characteristic of a simulated
traffic enviroment and in-vehicle tasks impact driver performances
and visual scanning behavior.
In experiment 1, authors manipulated task- relevant information bandwidth
and task priority. In Experiment 2, the authors examined task bandwidth
and complexity, while introducing infrequent traffic hazards.
Overall, task priority had a significant impact on scanning; however,
the impact of inceasing bandwidth was varied, depending on whether
the relevant task was supported by focal( e.g., in-vehicle tasks;
increased scanning) or ambient vision( e.g., lane keeping; no increasing
in scanning).
The computational model accounted for approximately 95% of the variance
in scanning across both experiments.
keywords: visual attention, driving, models of scanning,
in-vehicle technologies, driver distraction
干你的勒
好多喔快20页,完全不想看颗颗
--
2.检举事由:
恶意赚取P币
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc), 来自: 匿名天使的家
※ 文章网址: https://webptt.com/cn.aspx?n=bbs/HatePicket/M.1444388600.A.8AC.html