作者baculovirus (Gettingmore)
看板GRE
标题[作文] 有关AWA argument题目类型
时间Wed Jun 17 00:19:16 2015
各位大家好，最近在准备Argument 时，碰上了一点小小的疑惑。
之前有再来欣补过，但是时间过了许久，记忆有点不是这麽样的清楚。
我想Argument是在找文章中逻辑的演绎错误，并用此逻辑错误，推翻文章结论。
在题目後都会有一段简短的叙述，种类各不相同。
例如：
1. Write a response in which
you discuss what specific evidence
is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence
would weaken or strengthen the argument.
2. Write a response in which
you examine the stated and/or unstated
assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument
depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the
argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
3. Write a response in which
you discuss what questions would need
to be answered in order to decide whether the prediction and the
argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain
how the answers to these question would help to evaluate the prediction.
虽然手段都是找出逻辑错误，
但是对於不同的问题叙述，我是否应该也要有不一样的答题形式呢。
(例如在主题句明确指出这里要讨论的是 specific evidence 或者 to be
answered question)
我在阅读官方作文范例时，发现并非所有的范例都会针对题目的"问点"作回答，
反而是只指出文章的逻辑谬误，并作结。不知道这样是不是因为那些范文段数
太高呢？不是我这一般人该学习的模式。还是其实这样的答题方式，只要有指
出逻辑谬误，其实就是可以接受的呢？
谢谢各位耐心看完。(鞠躬)
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc), 来自: 223.138.196.125
※ 文章网址: https://webptt.com/cn.aspx?n=bbs/GRE/M.1434471558.A.2D4.html
※ 编辑: baculovirus (223.138.196.125), 06/17/2015 00:20:55
※ 编辑: baculovirus (223.138.196.125), 06/17/2015 00:21:27
※ 编辑: baculovirus (223.138.196.125), 06/17/2015 00:32:39