作者Pluronics (= =)
看板GRE_Verbal
标题Re: [考试] 请问一题argument
时间Wed Aug 15 07:17:17 2007
※ 引述《neopunk (Angelic whisper)》之铭言:
: The following is a letter to the editor of a local newspaper.
: "As a local merchant, I wish to support the development of a ski resort
: in the state park north of our township. Along with many other merchants
: who favor the proposal by Ski the Slopes, Incorporated, I would, of
: course, experience a growth in my business. But I also know how much more
: prosperous, not to mention lively and interesting, our community would be
: if tourism increased. Since the main opposition comes from a few
: environmentalists* who do not even live in this community, I see no reason
: to give in to their views. The First National Bank has finally researched
: the project and agreed to fund it. As a result, I see no reason to delay
: development of the resort."
: *Environmentalists are people who advocate the preservation of the natural
: environment.
1.滑雪场不一定能够振兴本地旅游业,考量因素太多,作者需要证明
2.环保团体尽管人数少,不住本地,但也不表示他们的反对无代表性
作者需要客观论述,而非主观论定不具代表
说不定不建滑雪场,经营生态旅游(ecotourism)还比较好
滑雪场不一定是最好的选择
3.银行同意赞助只能代表此投资银行自己有可图利的地方,
不代表对社区环境或利益无害
对於这个计划,银行所考量的因素作者要讲清楚,而不是一语带过,
: 这一题想不太出来该怎麽反驳比较有力道
: 尤其是黄字部分的句子,实在不太了解他想表达的意思
: 那个转折用的but让我觉得好怪呀...
: 可以请好心的版友给些解释和答题方向吗~~
: 非常感谢 :)
就是指让我投资滑雪场不只我有得赚,
社区也有的赚得意思
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 218.166.207.45
1F:推 neopunk:超级感谢 :D 218.160.63.248 08/15 21:49