作者chestnut42 ()
看板GMAT
标题[CR. ] GWD TN12
时间Fri Jan 5 17:42:06 2018
Frobisher, a sixteenth-century English explorer, had soil samples from Canada
’s Kodlunarn Island examined for gold content. Because high gold content was
reported, Elizabeth I funded two mining expeditions. Neither expedition found
any gold there. Modern analysis of the island’s soil indicates a very low
gold content. Thus the methods used to determine the gold content of Frobisher
’s samples must have been inaccurate.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
(C) The methods used to assess gold content of the soil samples provided by
Frobisher were different from those generally used in the sixteenth century.
(E) Gold was not added to the soil samples collected by Frobisher before the
samples were examined.
想请问这题混淆选项C要怎麽排除呢?
如果F的评估方法不一样，不是可以当作assumption来support conclusion?
谢谢~~
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc), 来自: 61.220.204.147
※ 文章网址: https://webptt.com/cn.aspx?n=bbs/GMAT/M.1515145329.A.9E7.html
1F：推 wakamala: 我觉得是质疑/讨论题目，因为如果C是对的，表示题目说这 01/06 06:10
2F：→ wakamala: 份样本的高含金量这句话是错的。但E选让题目叙述都正确 01/06 06:10
3F：→ wakamala: ，只是因为缺了e选的资讯，所以造成题目中叙述的状况 01/06 06:10
4F：推 michaelmas: 与大众评估的方法不一样 不一定就是不准的 01/06 11:06
5F：→ michaelmas: 题目也没有说 其他16世纪用的方法就没有问题 01/06 11:22
6F：推 michaelmas: 觉得CR对西方人来说就在考故事 因为在土壤样本里加料 01/06 11:41
7F：→ michaelmas: 黄金来诈骗在西方历史中很常见 01/06 11:41
8F：推 kings1988: 我觉得是无关吧 C是同时代的在比耶 结论是跟现代 01/09 02:19