作者xlxl (Well...)
看板GMAT
标题[SC. ] sentence fragment vs absolute phrase
时间Mon Feb 13 17:37:59 2017
想请教以下这题(我的mac贴上来後格式怎麽改都好怪,请大家点连结看题目好了)
http://forum.chasedream.com/thread-387950-1-1.html
og17 720
According to a recent study of consumer spending on prescription medications,
increases in the sales of the 50 drugs that were
dvertised most heavily accounts for almost half of the $20.8 billion increase in
drug spending last year, the remainder of which prescription medicines that
companies did not advertise or advertised very little.
A. heavily accounts for almost half of the $20.8 billion increase in drug spending last year, the remainder of which came
B. heavily were what accounted for almost half of the $20.8 billion increase in drug spending last year; the remainder of the increase coming
C. heavily accounted for almost half of the $20.8 billion increase in drug spending last year, the remainder of the increase coming
D. heavily, accounting for almost half of the $20.8 billion increase in drug spending last year, while the remainder of the increase came
E. heavily, which accounted for almost half of the $20.8 billion increase in drug spending last year, with the remainder of it coming
答案是C
但我一开始就因为觉得C是sentence fragment而把它删掉了
查看到有网友说这是absolute phrase
但还是有点看不懂,不知道有没有人可以说明一下怎麽判断到底是sentence fragment
还是absolute phrase(实在看不太懂absolute phrase的定义)
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc), 来自: 114.137.196.37
※ 文章网址: https://webptt.com/cn.aspx?n=bbs/GMAT/M.1486978682.A.0D8.html
※ 编辑: xlxl (114.137.196.37), 02/13/2017 17:39:59
1F:推 danyuchn: 要从语意来判断。absolute phrase中文通常叫做「独立主 02/13 22:51
2F:→ danyuchn: 格的分词构句」。所以必须要具备补充说明前句细节或者 02/13 22:51
3F:→ danyuchn: 阐述前句伴随结果的内容。若是没有这样的句意关系, 02/13 22:52
4F:→ danyuchn: 那就变成了sentence fragment。 02/13 22:52
5F:→ danyuchn: 像这边的the remainder of the increase coming.... 02/13 22:53
6F:→ danyuchn: 在补充说明前面提到的东西之外的东西来自哪里,所以 02/13 22:53
7F:→ danyuchn: 属於补充说明细节的分词构句。记得,absolute phrase的 02/13 22:54
8F:→ danyuchn: 结构是S + Ving/Vpp....。不能单独存在,是作为修饰语 02/13 22:54
9F:→ danyuchn: 修饰紧接的主要子句。 02/13 22:54
10F:→ xlxl: 谢谢Dustin 的说明,这样就比较清楚了~~~ 02/15 21:10