想请教大家这题的解题逻辑 Kitchen magazine plans to license the use of its name by a line of cookware. For a magazine, licensing the use of its name for products involves some danger, since if the products disappoint consumers, the magazine's reputation suffers, with consequent reductions in circulation and advertising. However, experts have evaluated the cookware and found it superior to all other cookware advertised in Kitchen. Therefore, Kitchen can collect its licensing fee without endangering its other revenues. The argument above assumes which of the following? A. No other line of cookware is superior to that which will carry the Kitchen name. B. Kitchen will not license the use of its name for any products other than the line of cookware. C. Makers of cookware will not find Kitchen a less attractive advertising vehicle because the magazine's name is associated with a competing product. D. Consumers who are not regular readers of Kitchen magazine will be attracted to the cookware by the Kitchen name. E. Kitchen is one of the most prestigious cooking-related magazines. 题目已说experts have evaluated the cookware and found it superior to all other cookware advertised in Kitchen 所以找出一个缺口去合理此逻辑的结论Kitchen can collect licesing fee without endangering its other revenues. 即 厂商愿意付钱 而(C)选项 因为Kitchen杂志的名字让人联想到有竞争力、好的产品(competing不确定怎麽翻?) 所以厂商不会认为Kitchen杂志是个没有吸引力的广告媒介 因此K杂志可以向厂商收取use of its name费用 可以请大家帮忙看一下这样的理解正确吗? 题目中without endangering its other revenues 是指因为厂商认同K杂志的广告媒介效果 所以 例如..愿意付广告刊登费用吗? 所以K杂志就不会endanger its other revenues了? 希望有表达到我的意思啊 有种越写越鬼打墙的感觉 =.=! 请高手不吝帮忙解惑 感谢了 --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 117.19.215.5