官方说法：Ｓ城的饭店住房率＞Ｈ城的饭店住房率 Ｈ城的某饭店反驳：比较多旅客住在他们的饭店＞Ｓ城的某Ｒ饭店 若以上两个数据都对，问这个Ｈ城某饭店犯了甚麽错？ 他以为Ｓ城只有那个Ｒ饭店....>"< 很明显的,即使他的住房率真的比R饭店高,也不见得就可以反驳官方说法 他没有考虑到其他的饭店.... ※ 引述《KobashiKenta (nameless)》之铭言： : GWD6-Q28: : 填空 : Which of the following most logically completes the argument below? : According to promotional material published by the city of Springfield, more : tourists stay in hotels in Springfield than stay in the neighboring city of : Harristown. A brochure from the largest hotel in Harristown claims that more : tourists stay in that hotel than stay in the Royal Arms Hotel in Springfield. : If both of these sources are accurate, however, the county’s “Report on : Tourism” must be in error in indicating that _______. : A.more tourists stay in hotel accommodations in Harristown than stay in the : Royal Arms Hotel : B.the Royal Arms Hotel is the only hotel in Springfield : C.there are several hotels in Harristown that are larger than the Royal Arms : Hotel : D.some of the tourists who have stayed in hotels in Harristown have also stayed : in the Royal Arms Hotel : E.some hotels in Harristown have fewer tourist guests each year than the Royal : Arms Hotel has : 答案为 B : 看了解答後还不是很懂 所以上来请问大家 : 解答说法: : If the Report on Tourism indicate B, it must be fault because: tourists in : hotels: S>H, hotel tourist: H> R.R, therefore, if the R.R is the only hotel : in S, it is impossible to say that S have more tourists than H. : 麻烦大家了>"< 谢谢 --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 118.160.168.145