1.financial interest的考量很多，不能光凭real estate的价格， 如果S地房地产上升的原因是因为经济起飞，P地则是经济下降， 那麽即使一开始成本房地价格低，但之後的收益也低，这样无法达到profit 2.只有告诉我们这两个地区real estate，却没有告诉我们其他条件是不是都一样， 例如人口结构、城市机能the function of the city、交通便利、经济能力等等， 这样很难论断谁比较好 3.说不定S城市再涨也超不过P城市,题目中没有告诉我们涨之前的价格 ※ 引述《denizee3 (妮)》之铭言： : The following appeared in a letter from a part-owner of a small retail : clothing chain to her business partner: : “Commercial real estate prices have been rising steadily in the Sandida : Heights neighborhood for several years, while the prices in the adjacent : neighborhood of Palm Grove have remained the same. It seems obvious, then, : that a retail space in Sandida Heights must now be much more expensive than a : similar space in Palm Grove, which was not the case several years ago. So, : it appears that retail spaces in Sandida Heights are now overpriced relative : to those in Palm Grove. Therefore, it would be in our financial interest to : purchase a retail space in Palm Grove rather than in Sandida Heights.”） : 请问一下这题Argument可以从哪些论点下去反驳呢? : 谢谢! --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 174.1.45.169 ※ 编辑: Diablotin 来自: 174.1.45.169 (10/11 10:56) ※ 编辑: Diablotin 来自: 174.1.45.169 (10/11 22:22)